Slashdot Mirror
Fully Internal Water-cooled Xbox 360
NiteStar writes "Dano2k0 created a fully internal water-cooled Xbox 360. Unlike previous water-cooled Xbox 360 mods, this one has everything inside the original Xbox 360 case, including the water reservoir and pump. Both CPU (Zern GPU block) and GPU (Koolance GPU-180-H06 block) are water-cooled, with internal Tank-o-Matic mini reservoir, 12v thermaltake pump and DD fill port on the plexi window. The case itself is also customized with a plexiglass grill and LEDs, and it's fully custom painted. The case mod will also be featured in the next edition of the Official Xbox Magazine UK."
Why?
Shouldn't someone be cooling the power supply? That's the real problem.
This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
A lot of people are asking why or pointing out that the power supply is what really needs cooling. I feel I should point something out.
The whole point of consoles is that you shouldn't need to do bullshit like this. Clearly someone at Microsoft severely fucked up if people are finding it necessary to modify their XBox 360's just so they don't overheat. Once you start having to do all of that all you have is a cheap computer (not ever that cheap) that can't do all the other computer type things.
Failures to understand things like this will ensure that Microsoft never turns a profit in their gaming hardware division and why Nintendo will keep going. Nintendo provides me with an appliance that just works for what it was designed for.
This is of course not to say that doing stuff to consoles isn't fun or worthwhile. I thought the XBox to PC mods were a real hoot, but before this generation, no one has felt the need to mod just to make their hardware work properly (ancient consoles excluded).
Help I'm a rock.
No, this is not illegal, but it will most definitely void any sort of warranty you might have. Even changing the operation of the system might be against Microsoft's Terms of Service if you try to go online with it, but the idea that changing your system's case (something that you OWN) would be "illegal" is certainly a scary thought.
I'm sorry to burst your fairytale fantasy, but any other console has been a small computer in disguise too. Your beloved Nintendo or Sony or whatever don't run on magic and pixie dust either, but, guess what? Use a CPU, a graphics card, RAM, etc.
E.g., the Dreamcast had the same graphics chip that was available in PC graphics cards too, a modem that you could have bought on the PC too, off the shelf SDRAM, and generally guess what? It was just a fucking computer in an ugly white box. It even took peripherals like keyboard and/or mouse, or you could buy an ISDN or Ethernet adapter for it. All that it had different was a non-Intel CPU, that's all.
And if the people are willing to pay that, the problem is...? No, seriously. Since when was it a duty to provide everything for free? If they can put a price on something and the market actually pays it, then that's just capitalism in action.
Oh yes, I'm sure that _you_ could single handedly emulate every single game in existance, on a different CPU and a different graphics chip and all. Emulation isn't a trivial affair buddy, and it becomes increasingly problematic because of ever increasing complexity of the system you're trying to emulate. Yes, I'm sure everyone can wave Zsnes as proof that a console can be emulated, but look further up the food chain. It took several teams about 6 years to emulate a PSX acceptably. (But any existing emu still doesn't emulate at least a quarter of the PSX titles well enough!) It took more than 6 years of trying to emulate the PS2, and _still_ noone has more than a few demos and games that make it barely past the start menu, to show for that effort.
So basically, you know, if you're going to proclaim people as idiots for not being able to emulate the XBox, how about proving that you're not exactly as big an idiot? Surely you can get at least the CPU emulated perfectly in real time and at the correct speed on a dual-G5? I mean, come on, you can find the specs for both CPUs online, there's no major secret involved.
The crashes and patches were brought by the companies who coded those games, not by MS. MS's only (debatable) fault was providing a HDD and an online connection, that made patches possible. But blaming every crash or patch on that MS decision is like blaming Boeing for the 9/11. Whatever happened to personal responsibility? If Company A thought it's perfectly ok to shaft its customers with a buggy untested game, surely only Company A is to blame? I fail to see how those providing just the connection or the medium are to blame there.
The 360 hardware is a fucking disaster even if you completely ignore the massive defect rate. It is essentially a 480p system trying to run games at 720p and ending up with jaggy and low frame rate messes.
Sad to burst your bubble, but noone is duty-bound to give you your dream gaming rig for a quarter of the price. Console games have always had to deal with lower specs. Consoles never were some $2000 gaming rig subsidized down to $300 whatever. The question is whether a game can look good enough on that hardware, not what specs you'd consider enough for a "true" 720p machine.
And from what I can tell, a helluva lot of people are actually satisfied with their frame rates in 360 games.
A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
I find it relatively funny that so many people are complaining about the 360 being a 'ticking time-bomb', and that people continue to claim that Microsoft is 'digging their grave' with the faulty hardware. I, beg to differ. While there have been a lot of issues with the console release, there were just as many at PS2 release and no one seems to equate these two situations because Microsoft is some 'horrible evil'. I own a 360 launch console and I have yet to have any issues whatsoever, and I'm not in the minority, either. There are a lot of incidents you hear about where people's 360s are on the fritz and you don't hear about those who are working... And for good reason. Why would someone complain or post on a message board that their XBox 360 is working just fine? You've fallen into the trap of believing only what you see because there is no real need to report on the other side of it. It is just like when something awry goes on in any aspect of the world - you only hear the negative because there is little incentive to report on the positive.
All of my friends and peers that own first generation 360 consoles still have them intact and working with little to no problems whatsoever. I know you hate Microsoft, but making unsubstantiated claims and implying that all consoles are faulty is preposterous. Don't pull the 360 from the market until it is officially broken. There may be issues right now with some consoles, but they're not as widespread as it would appear.