Slashdot Mirror


China Getting 'Serious' About Spam?

Ritz_Just_Ritz writes "Apparently, the Chinese MII (Ministry of Information) is going to crack down on Spam from within China. This will include training for 1000 mail administrators and recruitment of 20,000 'anti-spam volunteers.'"

9 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Those mail admins will be one in a million by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not in skill or particularity..just one in a million.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  2. Can't solve all your problems that way by BriamKG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can't solve all your problems with a great wall. Spam has been a problem for a long time, and it's one of those easily overcompensating balancing acts. Some services are overfiltering, and it's no surprise. There are all sorts of clever ways to try and sort things out, trying to recognize certain words or phrases or check to see if you know certain people, but in the end, there are always exceptions. What about that girl you met last night that really does work for the Mega Ab Destroyer 8000 Co? When it comes down to it, a fairly light filter that you check yourself, complemented with a whole lot of your own personal judgement tends to work. People need information about spamming techniques and what to watch out for, not just hard filtering.

  3. Re:China has a long way to go by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Say what you will about the United States, but at least you can't say that we spend extreme percentages on our military while we have major internal problems.

    Yes I can. And I do. Fuck, we spend more on prisoners than we do on students, let alone military. And guess what? The military gets more money than the correctional system, which also gets a super shitload of cash.

    You don't know what the fuck you're talking about, especially in the last, oh, term and a half. From surplus to record deficit in six years - specifically due to military spending.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Nobody seems worried over at Specialham by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Over at SpecialHam, the forum for bottom-feeder spammers, it seems to be business as usual today. No mention of any crackdown in China. Typical message: "Please give me ICQ UINs of poeple who make installations at trojaned computers. I need to install some software." There's some gloating over the collapse of BlueSecurity. Some new ways to spam Myspace. But no real concerns about enforcement today.

  5. 2+2 = ? by Frightening · · Score: 2, Interesting

    *Reads headline only*

    -A while back we were told Taiwan held the world cup for spam (small statue of a devil holding an envelope).

    -Now China wants to crack down on spam.

    -I see only one way they can do this, or am I terribly mistaken? (P.S Yes I am aware issue is cleared up in summary. Just laugh.)

  6. The real question.... by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    will spammers get the death penalty? Think I just found the ultimate ethical delimma for the average slashdotter. Is it good if China executes a spammer, but does so in it's new fleet of mobile lethal injection vans and harvests the organs for sale? When cheering the execution of spammers, which at least half the readership here has been waiting for, can you be sure your celebration is for a real spammer or a political dissident?

    --
    Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
  7. Gvmnt Servers by jeffy210 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, I'm supprised with all the censoring and filtering they do, they just don't mandate all email be sent through government controlled servers and block port 25 on the "great firewall". That way they could say it's in the name of spam (or security, or whatever) and still read what they want. (I know, I know, stop giving them ideas)

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  8. Re:Translation of the Article by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I agree with you.
    eldavojohn, I think you're pushing things a bit far. Everyone agrees that the chinese government is opressive. But this is not Orwell's 1984. The government provides stability, which was rarely present in chinese history. There is no mass shuffling of money from the poor to the rich, although there is increasing disparity these days as industrilization makes it harder to make a living in rural communities. The government really does put the well being of its people first. Ahead of their foreign reputation, which is why we all see them as the bad guys.

    I believe China will evolve into a democracy in its own time.

  9. no matter to me by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as each inbound connect attempt (to my ssh port, which I have tightly controlled via tcpwrappers, you morans!) is logged, so is an ipfw (freebsd) firewall entry to block either /24 or - fuck it - /16 from their netblock. IF its from .cn or .tw or .kr (etc). I discover (as they float to my log) and block. full block, not just email.

    fark them. there's zero accountability there and I doubt things will change. I run a very small site and so there is no NEED to allow spam^Hemail from those geo's.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."