Slashdot Mirror


China Getting 'Serious' About Spam?

Ritz_Just_Ritz writes "Apparently, the Chinese MII (Ministry of Information) is going to crack down on Spam from within China. This will include training for 1000 mail administrators and recruitment of 20,000 'anti-spam volunteers.'"

40 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Wow, short aricle for sure by fullphaser · · Score: 4, Informative

    no need to click the link kids that it pretty much. anyway thank god... now about korea?

    --
    Did someone say cake?
    1. Re:Wow, short aricle for sure by iezhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An insider at ISC said MII has set up a hotline at 01-12321 for spam-related tip-offs and is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices.

      fighting spam with spam? :)

    2. Re:Wow, short aricle for sure by Nadsat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where's the rest of the article? It's so short. I feel like someone censored all the content....

  2. Translation of the Article by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I see this article was still in Chinese when I read it. Allow me to translate it into English:
    Ministry of Information Industry (MII), Internet Society of China (ISC) and China Communications Standards Association (CCSA) launched a national anti-spam campaign on June 21, reports Nanfang Daily.
    Translation: "The MII decided it was time to start a campaign that looks like it will help the people. The ISC & CCSA were informed of this decision."
    An insider at ISC said MII has set up a hotline at 01-12321 for spam-related tip-offs and is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices.
    Translation: "The MII instructed the Nanfang Daily to print this. Like every other government controlled media outlet, the Nanfang Daily immediately complied. The MII has constructed methods for witch hunts and omitted the precise definition of 'spam' or what the criteria consists of. There are roughly one million people the MII doesn't really care for and they will receive notices informing them that they had better go underground or face prosecution without a trial."
    The report said that professional training will be offered for 1,000 email administrators and that 20,000 anti-spam volunteers will be recruited.
    Translation: "One thousand citizens will be trained to point the finger at anyone the government doesn't like using an ISP. This will prevent anyone from speculating that it is just one person or the government doing this. It will also aid in making this look like a benefit for the people. A lucky 20,000 other individuals will learn to play ball for the government and this will go on their permanent records--which might lead to good fortune."

    I'm going to take a stab in the dark and wager that SPAM simply means "e-mailing the way the government doesn't want you to" in Chinese. Whether that be based on the content or motive of your e-mails. The government seems to be implementing laws that have no clear definition in order to devise a method by which they can jail/fine/deter anyone they want. And it will most likely be met with synchronous thundering applause of one billion people clapping robotically togethor.

    Americans lose their freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism. Now the Chinese will lose their freedoms in the name of fighting SPAM. *sigh* Canada keeps looking warmer and warmer.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Translation of the Article by pete6677 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if this is true, Chinese people have more freedom now than they did 20 years ago, and things will continue to progress in this direction. Government crackdows are getting harder to pull off, there is a lot of unpublished internal dissent, and the government is begging for a revolution if their response is to just crack down harder. Piss off 1 billion people alltogether, and its pretty hard to keep them contained.

    2. Re:Translation of the Article by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

      Canada keeps looking warmer and warmer.

      Yeah, well, wait till November rolls around. Then you'll be saying, "Screw this freedom crap. I'm goin' to Mexico."

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Translation of the Article by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree with you.
      eldavojohn, I think you're pushing things a bit far. Everyone agrees that the chinese government is opressive. But this is not Orwell's 1984. The government provides stability, which was rarely present in chinese history. There is no mass shuffling of money from the poor to the rich, although there is increasing disparity these days as industrilization makes it harder to make a living in rural communities. The government really does put the well being of its people first. Ahead of their foreign reputation, which is why we all see them as the bad guys.

      I believe China will evolve into a democracy in its own time.

    4. Re:Translation of the Article by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love it!!!

      "The government really does put the well being of its people first. Ahead of their foreign reputation, which is why we all see them as the bad guys

      So that is why America hates China! They look after their people!

      This statement also holds true:
      "Everyone agrees that the AMERICAN government is opressive. But this is not Orwell's 1984. The government provides stability, which was rarely present in AMERICAN history. There is no mass shuffling of money from the poor to the rich, although there is increasing disparity these days as industrilization makes it harder to make a living in rural communities."

  3. Site already Slow.. Heres the article by u16084 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ministry of Information Industry (MII), Internet Society of China (ISC) and China Communications Standards Association (CCSA) launched a national anti-spam campaign on June 21, reports Nanfang Daily. An insider at ISC said MII has set up a hotline at 01-12321 for spam-related tip-offs and is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices. The report said that professional training will be offered for 1,000 email administrators and that 20,000 anti-spam volunteers will be recruited. "is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices" - Oh the irony.

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  4. I wanna volunteer by 77Punker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where can I sign up? I wanna read people's mail!

    1. Re:I wanna volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      www.nsa.gov/jobs

    2. Re:I wanna volunteer by Obi-w00t · · Score: 2, Funny

      www.nsa.gov/careers actually.
      You see its not just a job...it's a career!

    3. Re:I wanna volunteer by TheBogie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if they will let the volunteers attach the car batteries to the spammer's nuts. The "diehard" treatment seems to be a common "reprogramming" technique used by china. I'm pretty sure it will work on spammers as well as it does on the other chinese "troublemakers".

  5. Volunteers by JesseL · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are these 'anti-spam volunteers' real volunteers, or are they volunteering-to-get-out-of-bayonette-testing volunteers?
    Just curious.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  6. Wake me up by hackstraw · · Score: 3, Insightful


    when the get 'serious' about spam coming _outside_ of China!

    About 50% of my spam has url's resolving back to China or Korea.

    1. Re:Wake me up by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but it has to be properly worded. It should say:

      "Thank you for your interest in Falun Gong. Information
      is being mailed to you."

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  7. "Spam" by buxrule · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With all the censoring China does, it sounds to me like it's just an excuse to hire 20000 people to read through everyone's email and make sure they're not discussing something they "shouldn't" be talking about.

  8. Defeat Spam with Spam by neonprimetime · · Score: 2, Funny

    is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices

  9. US priorities by electrosoccertux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find it informing that our politicians are willing to sanction trade with Sweden because *our* (i.e. Not Their) laws say they are infringing on our IP. But we haven't heard anything of the sort in relation to China and Nigeria over spam (a much bigger problem).

    Regardless of whether or not we have a copy of a blank check signed by the RIAA to [insert politician here], this passive aggression our leaders are so fond of is very telling.

  10. Well, they had better get cracking by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

    Current estimates by Trend Micro show China responsible for over 14 billion spams per day.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Well, they had better get cracking by KingPrad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well that explains my inbox. But how many do they send to everyone else?

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  11. Will they treat spammers like Falun Gong members? by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'll beleive Communist China is serious about stopping spammers when they start treating them like Falun Gong members. You know, like imprisoning them in forced labor camps and working them to death. Or maybe torturing them. But until they're willing to treat spammers with the same harsh methods the Communist Party reserves for those trying to exercise freedom of religion, I doubt I'll see any reduction of spam in my mailbox.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  12. Those mail admins will be one in a million by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not in skill or particularity..just one in a million.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  13. Can't solve all your problems that way by BriamKG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can't solve all your problems with a great wall. Spam has been a problem for a long time, and it's one of those easily overcompensating balancing acts. Some services are overfiltering, and it's no surprise. There are all sorts of clever ways to try and sort things out, trying to recognize certain words or phrases or check to see if you know certain people, but in the end, there are always exceptions. What about that girl you met last night that really does work for the Mega Ab Destroyer 8000 Co? When it comes down to it, a fairly light filter that you check yourself, complemented with a whole lot of your own personal judgement tends to work. People need information about spamming techniques and what to watch out for, not just hard filtering.

  14. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is no big secret here. In line with your typical Chinese legal remedy, first time spammers will be impaled through the back with a bayonette, and shot through the heart at point blank range. Second time offenders are actually rather rare in China.

  15. China has a long way to go by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Informative

    Say what you will about the United States, but at least you can't say that we spend extreme percentages on our military while we have major internal problems. China wouldn't have anywhere near the problems it does today with crime and pollution if it didn't devote so many resources to its military. I get tired of the excuses for their priorities "oh they're afraid of the United States!" Bullshit. We can't even get riled up over Afghanistan, a country that aided and abetted the 9-11 terrorists and protected their ring leader. China would have to do something monstrous like conquer one of the "asian tigers" or Japan to get enough passion to actually fight them. You know what this just proves once again? Big government doesn't give a fuck about the common person unless they're revolting or about to. China's spam problems are only the tip of the iceberg. How about stopping all of those hack attacks against government and industry first? Priorities, priorities.

    1. Re:China has a long way to go by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Say what you will about the United States, but at least you can't say that we spend extreme percentages on our military while we have major internal problems.

      Yes I can. And I do. Fuck, we spend more on prisoners than we do on students, let alone military. And guess what? The military gets more money than the correctional system, which also gets a super shitload of cash.

      You don't know what the fuck you're talking about, especially in the last, oh, term and a half. From surplus to record deficit in six years - specifically due to military spending.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Nobody seems worried over at Specialham by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Over at SpecialHam, the forum for bottom-feeder spammers, it seems to be business as usual today. No mention of any crackdown in China. Typical message: "Please give me ICQ UINs of poeple who make installations at trojaned computers. I need to install some software." There's some gloating over the collapse of BlueSecurity. Some new ways to spam Myspace. But no real concerns about enforcement today.

  17. 2+2 = ? by Frightening · · Score: 2, Interesting

    *Reads headline only*

    -A while back we were told Taiwan held the world cup for spam (small statue of a devil holding an envelope).

    -Now China wants to crack down on spam.

    -I see only one way they can do this, or am I terribly mistaken? (P.S Yes I am aware issue is cleared up in summary. Just laugh.)

  18. 'bout time by CFrankBernard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many years now have numerous email admins either blocked all email from China or score hits to blacklists such as Blackhole's China & Korea Combined very highly? BTW, China definitely has no right to complain about firewall/gateway censorship.

  19. Serious Spam! by fohat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought this was going to be about the new FPS game "Serious Spam" in which the heroine tries to defeat democracy with her spam gun and filtered Google Water (beta).
    But seriously, I hope this cuts down on the number of emails I get with all question marks in the subject line. If China is succesful with this program, perhaps other countries will follow suite. (I'm looking at you, Taiwan! *shakes fist*)

    peace out.

    --
    Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
  20. The real question.... by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    will spammers get the death penalty? Think I just found the ultimate ethical delimma for the average slashdotter. Is it good if China executes a spammer, but does so in it's new fleet of mobile lethal injection vans and harvests the organs for sale? When cheering the execution of spammers, which at least half the readership here has been waiting for, can you be sure your celebration is for a real spammer or a political dissident?

    --
    Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
  21. Gvmnt Servers by jeffy210 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, I'm supprised with all the censoring and filtering they do, they just don't mandate all email be sent through government controlled servers and block port 25 on the "great firewall". That way they could say it's in the name of spam (or security, or whatever) and still read what they want. (I know, I know, stop giving them ideas)

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  22. Re:Site already Slow.. Heres the article by johnMG · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, will most of the analysis be done by Information Retrieval or Information Dispersal?

    Either way, Central Services will probably end up doing all the dirty work.

    My only suggestion: make sure they've filled out a 27b/6 form before you let them lay a finger your server. But then, I'm a bit of a stickler for paperwork.

  23. no matter to me by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as each inbound connect attempt (to my ssh port, which I have tightly controlled via tcpwrappers, you morans!) is logged, so is an ipfw (freebsd) firewall entry to block either /24 or - fuck it - /16 from their netblock. IF its from .cn or .tw or .kr (etc). I discover (as they float to my log) and block. full block, not just email.

    fark them. there's zero accountability there and I doubt things will change. I run a very small site and so there is no NEED to allow spam^Hemail from those geo's.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  24. You don't know that by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    May I point out that, although totalitarian regimes _do_ violate human rights and mis-use laws against dissidents, sometimes they actually have to solve an actual problem? E.g., even Stalin's USSR and Mao's China at their darkest hour, while they did have a some of the most brutal suppression of dissidents, they also had laws to deal with plain old crimes like theft, embezzlement, murder, etc. They also had plenty of civil laws too, like for example, divorces, inheritance, child support, etc.

    I.e., it seems to me pretty stupid to assume that any law in China is somehow _guaranteed_ be 100% for oppression purposes, and only disguised in a more propaganda-friendly guise. Maybe someone there genuinely got fed up with spam. Maybe a bunch of bosses in the PRC just had one day too many of finding their inboxes full of "H3rb@1 \/i@gr@" emails. Or maybe it was the "Thousands of 18 year old teens waiting for you!!!" mails. China's conservative leadership tends to take a very grim view of pornography, plus they have _much_ higher age of consent.

    Are those volunteers paid to either read other people's emails and to point fingers at demand? How do you know that? How do you know it's not just people paid to register email addresses and use them all over the place, and see what spam lands in those inboxes? Or maybe run honeypots to see who's actually commanding the army of spam-bots with Joe-job faked sender addresses? Or whatever? For the size of China 1000 admins and 20,000 volunteers is a spit in the ocean, if their goal was to read all emails. But to run a honeypot net or to get reliable reports of who's been spamming their inboxes, it may be just enough.

    Basically the D&D mentality that some people are by definition evil, hence they can only ever give evil laws, is so fucking stupid that it's not even funny. _Noone_ defines themselves as evil, sworn enemy of all goodness, and able to only ever do evil stuff, like in retarded D&D-type settings and cheap fantasy flicks. The Real Life isn't divided neatly like that.

    In RL even the most horrible dictator may really think they're only doing just what's good for their country (even if for everyone else it doesn't really count as good), and not just acting out of some Sith-like determination to extinguish all goodness. RL "evil" is more about not caring about collateral damage done than being some sworn destroyer of all that's still good and pure. And sometimes, even if by accident, their notion of "good" may actually be good.

    That's all I'm saying here too. Just assuming "The Chinese government is evil, hence any Chinese law _must_ be 100% for the sole purpose of crushing freedoms and harming people" is just bullshit. We just don't know that. Assuming you can "translate" like that, is just some self-righteous bullshit, nothing more.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:You don't know that by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I must have been unclear. I'm not saying they weren't evil. Yes, they were evil.

      I'm just saying that even evil people sometimes do good things. It doesn't necessarily make them less evil, but it doesn't make the act automatically evil by association either.

      E.g., Al Capone on one hand ordered some brutal massacres, but on the other hand opened soup kitchens for the victims of the great depression and paid (out of that ill gotten money) for shelter and clothing for them. Was he evil? Yes. Were his soup kitchens evil? No.

      That's really all I'm saying. One can't just say, "Person X is evil, action Y was done by X, hence Y is evil too." Guilt or evil aren't something transmittable by association like that.

      The same applies to the Chinese government too. Is it an evil oppressive government? Yes, certainly. Does it automatically make everything they touch evil? No. It _is_ entirely possible that someone genuinely is sick and tired of spam, or of seeing their country's reputation being tainted by spam. One can't automatically assume (or "translate") that an anti-spam law is automatically just some oppression tool against dissidents.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  25. F1gh7 5Pam and M A K E $$$ by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ho W Wo uld y0u L1k e 2 make B I G $$$

    Si gn UP n0w and B1 of 1000 34rning BIG $$$ gov J0B

    als0 R3crui7ing 20000!!! voleeteer to FIGHT SP4M!

    OK I can't be the first to think that this might be their way to find "volenteers" to do this. Oh the Irony!

  26. Please USA, get 'Serious' about Spam too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    See the stats here.

  27. You can get your answer dynamically, any time by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi,

    Click here: http://www.senderbase.org/

    You will notice "top senders by domain". There are some telecoms "shouldn't be" there. They are the spam infested ISPs who doesn't have a clue about managing their services. Sadly it includes my backbone too.

    I seriously suspect China spam is sort of foreign policy. As a spamcop (free,paid)/) user for years I have right to suspect so. Also if ISPs, large ISPs end this "politically correct" crap and enable country wide user selectable blocking lists you will see how they buy those Ironport, eSafe etc. devices by paying 1% of their revenue.

    What about commercial communications? Well you will tell your business partner to find a better managed ISP.