Slashdot Mirror


Review - Apple's MacBook Pro

Provataki writes "OSNews posted a 2-editor review of Apple's MacBook Pro laptop. The whole review feels like a long conversation between the two editors with agreements and disagreements on several issues and topics. They both agree that the laptop is too hot, but there is disagreement on the screen quality for example."

9 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. Summary by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 5, Informative
    • Screen: Adam likes the bright screen, Thom dislikes the viewing angle (color distortion) problems
    • Speed: Both of them love it.
    • Speakers: Both agree, the speakers are too quiet and distort at loud volumes. Thom notes it has digital optical audio out.
    • Keyboard: Adam likes it, Thom finds the layout too cramped, calls it "form over function". Both like the backlighting.
    • Airport: Adam has no problems. Thom finds the reception worse than his iBook.
    • Heat: Both agree, it is too hot.
    • Rosetta: Both agree, it is awesome, but native apps are eagerly anticipated.
    • Build Quality: Both like it. Adam wants more USB ports.
    • Battery: Both agree, battery life is skimpy.
    • Running Windows: Thom says it's "a breeze", Adam doesn't plan to try it.

    Frankly, I guess this points out that the MacBook Pro isn't "above" anything else. It's got its share of problems, and feelings are mixed about many features. Unlike the MacBook, though, the MacBook Pro isn't priced competitively with other brands. (The regular MacBook, surprisingly enough, since Apple is usually overpriced, matches up pretty well with PC manufacturers. It's hard to compare it directly because of the odd screen size, but it's only $100-$200 more than a PC, if even that.)

    1. Re:Summary by pVoid · · Score: 5, Informative
      Frankly, I guess this points out that the MacBook Pro isn't "above" anything else.

      Well, I'm a long time Microsoft'y, in that I've worked mainly on windows platforms (professionally) for the last decade. I just recently got a mac book pro. I'll tell you this much: I looked for a LONG time for a PC laptop that I could get instead. The only thing that came near in ergonomy was the LG laptops which were ridiculously overpriced. I mean, compare a Dell laptop (which looks like a tank) to a macbook pro, i.e. hold both in your hands, and you will see there is an order of magnitude in difference.

      That being said, there are aspects of my Macbook that I am surprisingly disappointed about. Namely: Apple.

      From everything I had read - especially anti microsoft bashing comparing how Windows has so many bugs etc - Apple is unbelievably bad at both hardware and software tech support.

      Examples: there is a high pitch whining noise that comes from the MacBook Pros. It is quite obviously an electrical leak, which consistently goes away if you switch off the second core. Apple has yet to *officially* acknowledge this problem. It's one thing to acknowledge, it's another thing to replace. They could easily say "yeah, sorry, that's not repairable", but it's quite insulting to go to an authorized dealer and say "there, don't you hear it? it's driving me insane" and get an answer "uhm, sorry, no, I don't hear it". Same for AppleCare.

      Speaking of apple care, they treat their custommers like idiots. I had a problem with my fan making a rattling noise - clearly a ball bearing problem. I call apple care, it was so loud she could hear it on the phone without my even putting the phone up to the laptop. I was just laughing when she took me step by step through how to put the installation CD in, boot off of it, and run checkdisk (which btw, yielded all green, to which she grunted in disappointment - I guess people shut off their computers often enough that they always get red warnings about filesystem problems...) Anyways...

      And last but not least, they recently came out with a patch for Quicktime that would effectively freeze your entire UI if you ran certain programs. When contacting AppleCare, they asked me which program did this, and I said "Unrar", "Graphviz" and "Adobe apps", to which his 'straight faced' reply was: we're sorry, Apple can not take responsability for third party software. Which is preposterous because it wasn't the third party software failing so much as the *entire* OS freezing up.

      They later reissued a new patch that fixed this problem - but Apple *never* admitted that their initial fix was broken.

      All of this is that kind of stuff that would turn into a flame storm for Microsoft.

      All that aside, I still like my mbp.

    2. Re:Summary by Darsovit · · Score: 5, Informative

      Funny, I have found that the Macbook Pro 17" is cheaper than a comparably equipped Dell XPS M1710 17". I've left the Macbook Pro with the default settings (although the hard drive can be changed to truly match the Dell's 100GB 7200 rpm drive since the Dell doesn't have the 120 GB 5400rpm option that the Macbook Pro has) and it's listed on the online store at $2799.00. For the Dell XPS M1710, I chose the basic model, then upgraded the processor to 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo, added the Remote for Windows XP Media Center (the Macbook Pro comes with a remote standard, $29), upgraded the hard drive to 100 GB as noted ($215), upgraded to the CD/DVD Burner combo drive ($50), and added the Bluetooth ($49) and the total at their online store is $3118.

      I could upgrade the memory on the Macbook Pro to 2GB and still be under the Dell with 1 GB of RAM.

      Granted, this is only a comparison with one competitor, but with the use of the Intel processor in the Mac it can now be compared pretty closely and it would seem to be competing fairly well, at least with this brand.

  2. Existing owners' CPU whine-logic board replacement by mccalli · · Score: 3, Informative
    I own a 15" 1.83Ghz MacBook Pro, and the whine is appalling on it. As of yesterday, there's now a programme for swapping the logic boards out. That story takes place in the US - I've just called in the UK and found that although the swap exists, I'll have to go in to an Apple service centre to get the fault confirmed before I can go ahead with it.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  3. Comparing MacBook Pro and Dell Inspiron e1705 by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 3, Informative
    Funny, I have found that the Macbook Pro 17" is cheaper than a comparably equipped Dell XPS M1710 17"

    Of course Dell's high-end gaming laptop is going to cost more! A much more realistic comparison would be with the Dell Inspiron e1705. I set them up with the following config: 2.16 GHz processor, 2 GB 667 MHz RAM, 120 GB 5400 RPM HDD (available on the e1705, if not the XPS M1710), remote (added on the Dell), DVD burner, Bluetooth. The Dell came out to $2708; the Mac came out to $3099. With 1 GB of RAM and a 100 GB 7200 RPM HDD, the Dell comes to $2638 and the Mac comes to $2699. A lot closer. But that's the highest-end configuration of the Dell. If we start with the second-lowest and configure it the same, it comes to $2480. Pretty much no matter what you do, you get the same specs for $200-$400 less with a Dell.

    1. Re:Comparing MacBook Pro and Dell Inspiron e1705 by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you placing no value on the (I'm guessing here) optical audio out, the camera, firewire, backlit keyboard, iLife applications, OS X itself, fancy power chord thing, the fact that it can run either OS (or both), etc? I'm really asking, not arguing.

  4. Re:Correction by Darsovit · · Score: 4, Informative

    The RAM upgrade on the apple is $300 more. But I think you also need to upgrade the video card from the Dell e1705. The ATI Mobility X1400 with Hypermemory (when you click on the Help Me Choose on the Dell website) seems to indicate that it uses 256MB of shared System memory vs. the Macbook Pro's 256MB of GDDR3 on the ATI X1600. So, yes, I did indeed compare it to the high-end gaming laptop because of this.

  5. Re:2 day review of the 1.83/intel dual core by splatterboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wasn't fujitsu - PPC was a product of the AIM consortium - Apple, IBM, Motorola... Moto designed the G3 & 4 using the PPC architecture from IBM and the G5 was all IBM

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." ~The Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan
  6. Re:This irked me by TheGreek · · Score: 3, Informative
    AS: My closing thoughts: the transition to Intel is nearly complete.
    Umm. No?

    The iPod-centric portion of the Apple lineup is all Intel, but how about a real desktop?
    Entry-level desktop (Mac Mini): Intel.
    Consumer portable (MacBook): Intel.
    Consumer desktop (iMac): Intel.
    Pro portable (MacBook Pro): Intel.
    Pro desktop (PowerMac): PPC.
    Rack-mount server (Xserve): PPC.

    4/6 of Apple's computer models are now Intel, and these 4/6 comprise the bulk of Apple's sales. The two stragglers await the chips from Intel.

    That Apple's transition isn't complete enough for you doesn't make the transition any less nearing completion.