Slashdot Mirror


The Pentagon's Supersonic, Shape-Shifting Assassin

grammar fascist writes "CNN reports that Northrop Grumman is under contract to build a new supersonic, shape-shifting bomber by 2020. The main innovation is in its single, rotating wing. From the article: '[It] will cruise with its 200-foot-long wing perpendicular to its engines like a normal airplane. But just before the craft breaks the sound barrier, its single wing will swivel around 60 degrees (hence the name) so that one end points forward and the other back. This oblique configuration redistributes the shock waves that pile up in front of a plane at Mach speeds and cause drag. When the Switchblade returns to subsonic speeds, the wing will rotate back to perpendicular.'"

14 of 489 comments (clear)

  1. Wizard Weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Go America! Fuck Yeah!

  2. Re:Shape shifting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought it was going to be about a Doppleganger

  3. Silent but Deadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    takes on a whole new meaning here...

  4. Re:Shape shifting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Try opening your laptop at Mach 2.

  5. Boondoggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I love the smell of burning pork in the morning.

  6. Re:Budget Priortites by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rules of Acquisition say:

    34. War is good for business

    35. Peace is good for business.

    34 comes before 35. All clear?

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  7. Supersonic, Shape-Shifting Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Firefox's Live Bookmark feed, the title says "The Pentagon's Supersonic, Shape-Shifting Ass ..."

  8. Gotta love RSS... by RemovableBait · · Score: 3, Funny
    It might be just me with my widescreen, but the RSS dropdown thingy definitely said;

    The Pentagon's Supersonic, Shape-Shifting Ass...


    Somehow, I find my browser's interpretation more fitting...
  9. Re:Isn't "Assassin" in the title inflammatory? by Winterblink · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's so inflammatory about it? I mean what do you think this thing's supposed to do, fly in at supersonic speeds to deliver a payload of Snickers bars to satisfy the hunger of the enemy?

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  10. Re:Swing Wing Designs by HotBlackDessiato · · Score: 5, Funny
    I thought the consensus was that moving wings were a Bad Idea?
    As long as they remain attached somehow.
    --
    "If you don't have eyes you shouldn't have wings" -- Carl Pilkington
  11. Why is this not a secret? by Elegor · · Score: 3, Funny

    This seems more like the kind of thing that should be developed under a cloak of secrecy at Area 51. My guess is that it's seen as an outside shot by DARPA, and the $10.3m pocket change they're throwing at it convinces me even more that they're just using this as "gosh ain't we high-tech and futuristic" publicity (or propaganda if you'd rather) blurb.

    What seals it though is the 1950's Buck Rogers shiny treatment. Any self-respecting supersonic bomber has to have a mat-black paint job, surely?

  12. Re:Shape shifting? by bar-agent · · Score: 4, Funny

    At Mach 2, my laptop is even better! Now it lifts and separates!

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  13. Re:Britain isn't a major European economy? by MustardMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    You really need more than a knee-jerk intellect to be using political terminology, so you don't end up just diluting the definitions.

    Shut up, commie!

  14. Re:Shape shifting? by Gerzel · · Score: 2, Funny

    No. The feat is not opening the laptop but keeping it closed, grasshopper.