Immunizing the Internet
jonny4001 writes "The Harvard Law Review has published a student-written article that argues that hackers, worms, and viruses are good for network security and that the law and public policy should encourage 'beneficial' hacking. From the article: 'Exploitation of security holes prompts users and vendors to close those holes, vendors to emphasize security in system development, and users to adopt improved security practices. This constant strengthening of security reduces the likelihood of a catastrophic attack -- one that would threaten national or even global security [...] Current federal law, however, does not properly value such strategic goals.'"
Totally telling the FBI slashdot said it was 'ok'.
Darwin operates perfectly online! Now all we need is to set up the digital version of the Darwin Awards. Now, granted, idiot users aren't permanently removed from the gene pools, but if they ram enough computers into the dirt, they'll be dirt-poor and thus unsuitable as mates, hence they won't reproduce. Right?
I'm sure plenty won't click the link, so you are missing out on the great title that was left out of the summary:
IMMUNIZING THE INTERNET, OR: HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE WORM
Looks like I found a new Taquila drinking buddy.
Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
Might be a good idea, as long as you make the Robbers' Guild (wrong name I'm sure?) hand out receipts so nobody gets mugged more than three times a year. :)
"Good news, everyone!"
The rich people were probably just going to donate their spare wealth to charity to help the poor: robbery saves them the trouble of having to do that, too. It's a win-win situation!
I'll have you know that Dr. Bunsen Honeydew is a very good coder!
... just kick all the homeless people off of it.