Slashdot Mirror


Cell Users As Bad As Drunk Drivers

An anonymous reader writes "News.com reports on a cell-phone use study which confirms that talking on your cell is as bad as being drunk, when it comes to driving skill. The researchers studied 40 volunteers in a driving simulator." From the article: "[The subjects were observed] while undistracted, using a handheld cell phone, using a hands-free cell phone and while intoxicated to a 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level--the average legal level of impairment in the United States--after drinking vodka and orange juice. Three study participants rear-ended the simulated car in front of them. All were talking on cell phones and none was drunk, the researchers said."

7 of 738 comments (clear)

  1. where to draw the line? by tont0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Im not going to say that cell phones dont cause distractions while driving. But where is the line of concern drawn? I need to take my eyes of the road in order to change my CDs or the radio station. Or how about the nice people with stereo systems so loud it shakes the windows of your house. There is a small noise ordinance rule for that, but nothing major. Girls putting on make up, combing hair, getting ready, etc. Its unfair to just point out cell phone users and accidents. A line needs to be drawn somewhere if you are going to make that argument.

  2. Driving all over the road by eric76 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One night years ago when I lived south of Houston, I was driving over to a fast food place to get something to take home for supper.

    There was a van in front of me that was driving all over the road. It almost went into the ditch on each side of the road at least once.

    When we go to a four lane highway, the van spent part of the time taking up both lanes going our direction and some of the time in the oncoming lanes.

    I was surprised to see the van turn in ahead of me at the fast food joint and pull up to the drive through.

    Being the nice guy/asshole that I am, I thought I'd do a good deed and suggest that the driver wait for someone sober to drive him home. I stood about 5 feet from the window when I made my suggestion.

    It turned out to be a woman who had the foulest mouth of any woman I ever met. She was screaming unbelievably loud that she wasn't drunk, that she was only using her cell phone, and that how she drove was her business and noone elses.

    So I got back in my car.

    When I finally got around front, everyone inside was laughing. I guess everyone in the place, employee and customer alike, heard her tirade over the speaker system.

    I told a local cop about it later. He wasn't amused at all about it.

  3. Handsfree by BigDuke6_swe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think I've heard about a similar report where driving with and without handsfree was compared. The conclusion was that it's not the fact that your holding a phone thats the biggest issue. It's the fact that you're concentrating on something else than driving that causes reactions to take longer.

    --
    Zere vere zwei peanuts valking down der Straße, and von vas assaulted...peanut
  4. Re:Sure... .but by LoveGoblin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not to mention that the sound quality's a hell of a lot better. You're not spending brain resources trying to make out what they're saying over a crappy cell connection.

  5. Re:Something is fishy here by nickfrommaryland · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That table does only looks at total fatal crashes. There is no data on the total number of automobile accidents. I suspect that more people aren't dying in automobile accidents because automobiles are safer overall. Cell phones started becoming more common in 1994, but so did SUVs. Those bigger vechicles are less likely to cause fatalities to their occupants (although not necessarily their victims).

  6. Re:The usual response by absoluteflatness · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does it matter? They still rear ended a simulated car. Who cares if they're not as impaired as someone with a 0.1 BAC?

    The point is, they didn't rear-end a simulated car. From the summary:

    Three study participants rear-ended the simulated car in front of them. All were talking on cell phones and none was drunk, the researchers said.

    The grandparent's point is, the average legal limit of .08 is a conservative one (by design, I'm sure), and many people at .08 are perfectly capable of driving.
  7. Re:The usual response by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So while we're studying things, how about the people driving and talking to passengers? I bet they suck too.

    How much did you loose on that bet?
    I think that was on that Mythbuster episode... Passengers are in the same environment as the driver, and react to it with the driver... well, some times (arguments happen). People on the phone, however, don't wait to ask a question after you're done doing your left turn. It's really a different situation.

    And don't forget: anything distracting besidses the phone, you can ADD to the phone. You can have people on the phone and in the car talking to you at once, be drunk and on the phone, be tired and on the phone, etc.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...