Slashdot Mirror


Mysterious Website Actually Social Experiment

MaelstromX writes "For six months a website called eon8 (probably down) has carried a countdown to July 1, along with vague and mysterious codes. In addition, strange code-bearing posts associated with the site were made in various webforums, and the site carried a map of the world marked by spots of "deployment". All of this, along with some apparent recorded visits by US military and intelligence computers, led many people to believe this was an imminent terrorist operation or a massive virus to be unleashed on the web-surfing public. Turns out, it was just an experiment by a 23-year-old guy named Chris from Florida who wanted to see how people would react to an absence of information, and he was disappointed that people expected the worst -- even going to so far as to attempt to hack his webserver and make phone calls to anyone with any perceived tangential connection to the site or its host. A mirror of the site in its current state is available with an explanation added by the site owner after the countdown expired."

14 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. Just wait by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's all I can say right now ... just wait.

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  2. just wait... by m874t232 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This means that poorly designed web sites with unclear purposes will now be considered a terrorist threat and lead to indefinite detention of the designer(s).

    Well, I guess that's at least one effect of the anti-terrorist hysteria that I could get behind; all other efforts to force better web design have failed after all.

  3. And why should we believe him? by FhnuZoag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, just an experiment, he says. But how do we know? HOW DO WE KNOW?!?

    Please, arrest him quickly and torture him so that we may learn the true horror of his plot.

    1. Re:And why should we believe him? by mpcooke3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If he lived in the UK we'd have already accidentily shot him.

      You americans have such slack security.

  4. what the hell? by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most I can tell you is I am a 23 year old web designer from Florida named Mike.

    Where did the summary get the name Chris from?

    1. Re:what the hell? by AngryDill · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where did the summary get the name Chris from?

      It is a mystery, but the answer will be revealed on July 3rd. Keep watching the website slashdot.org.

      That's when the dupe will be posted ;-)

      -a.d-

      --


      I'm Erwin Schrodinger and I approve of this message, and I do not approve of this message!
  5. Mysterious Website Or Prank? by aymanh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who simply ignored the whole thing? I saw the link posted on many forums and blogs, but it looked like some sort of prank or whatever, only in movies you'd see terrorist organizations publicly providing maps of their targets, or countdown timers...

    --
    python>>> q="'";s='q="%c";s=%c%s%c;print s%%(q,q,s,q)';print s%(q,q,s,q)
    1. Re: Mysterious Website Or Prank? by ezzewezza · · Score: 5, Funny

      I did one better than you and had managed to have never even heard of it until today.

  6. No subject by naoursla · · Score: 5, Funny

    This comment is another social experiment to see how people react to a lack of information.

  7. disappointed people took it the wrong way? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This was a clumsy experiment at best. He's sad people assumed evil and says all that was on the site was the phrase "we don't want you here".

    That means the only info was negative. This is a commonly studied human phenomen called "framing" (or something similar). If you give a person very limited info, then they will use that tidbit of info will drastically influence their perception of the question at hand. If it has said something less ominous I'm sure it could have had a better reception. As it was, however, if you only give 1 factoid and the factoid is negative, and there's a countdown - how do you expect people to react?

    -stormin

    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  8. Re:Why is this surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    No -- it would be foolish to rule out the worst. Assuming the worst is just paranoid. It's the kind of thinking that would have triggered WWIII if it had dominated.
    Imagine, if we'd adopted that attitude, a proud country like the US could be running gulags and turning functioning (if repressive) nations into dangerous, extremist enemies.

    Whew! Dodged that bullet!
  9. Re:Don't worry! by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps because they ought to be focused on investigating people that they actually have EVIDENCE, INTELLIGENCE or PROBABLE CAUSE that a crime MAY be committed?

    Mysterious person spams codes all over the net. Codes could mean anything. Would the DHS take the risk of these codes being communication between hostile agents and possibly ending up with another PR desaster of "why didn't you see that major terrorist attack coming?"? Especially since the DHS seems to have a budget surplus they must get rid of*?

    *=Beaurocratic rules say that if you don't use your entire budget, your budget gets cut. Therefore everyone wastes all left overs before the budget times out. Yes I know that's stupid and inefficient but noone bothers to fix it.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  10. Plenty of people have done similar things by istartedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The one that Slashdotters might remember is the Transmeta website.

    The of course there is Ginger, which was the Segway, which is just an expensive scooter.

    When I lived in Charlottesville, VA there was a several month campaign of "the connosiers are coming". When they came, it was a "club" where you paid a flat fee and got discounts at local restaurants.

    The pattern with this kind of thing is that it's always anti-climactic. The same thing goes for song count-downs on the radio. Oh. Stairway to Heaven wins again. Even when that doesn't happen, whatever song does win is always a letdown. I think it's just human nature. It always seemed to me that David Letterman's 3 or 4 was funnier than the number 1 on his top ten. Was that on purpose, or is number 1 always a let down? I guess the way to test that would be to have Letterman tape several versions of his top 10, show them to different audiences and ask them if they thought number 1 really belonged. The problem with that is that "delivery" is an important part of comedy, and I suppose that "deliver" is an important part of other information too. In other words, "metadata" is "data" or as an earlier generation used to say, "the medium is the message". In this case, the guy just transmitted nothing but metadata, and I think the results were not too surprising. In the absence of data, people attach the metadata to the context, in this case, our current climate of paranoia and fear provided the context.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  11. Re:Troll response by Omestes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Goodbye mod points...

    This point is missed in the modern tech savvy libertarian geek. They want a system that benefits their immediate greed, their future and everyone else be damned. I really can't think of any other reason than greed that anyone would support such an untenable and intangible ideal.

    Civilization is doomed to be imperfect, and unfair. Social security tries to evens this out a bit. I have a feeling that most people who are against it have never been down and out, or poor, or rendered incapable of work. I have a feeling that they really don't care that 90% of America is two paychecks away from the streets, meaning if they loose their job for two measly weeks their in a world of hurt and debt, of no fault of their own. Sure they could have invested, but this precludes the idea that they had excess capital to begin with. Its hard to invest money when your living paycheck to paycheck, and fighting off the debt of raising a family or paying off a mortgage on a wage that is grossly inadequate for any standard of living.

    Adventures in capitalism is only for the rich. And a hugely vast majority of us aren't wealthy by any means, of no fault of our own. Not all of Americans have good paying tech jobs, but it seems that some people can't escape from their own position to see how other people live, and are far too egotistical to see that helping others is our responsibility, especially since we have the means to do so.

    This is going to get modded to oblivion, isn't it? The anti-slashbot POV.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey