Slashdot Mirror


Athens Breeding "Super Mosquitoes"

Chemisor writes "Air pollution and cramped housing conditions in Athens, Greece, are creating a new breed of mosquitoes which are bigger, faster, and can smell humans from farther away. The super insects have color vision and detect humans from 25-30 meters, which is about 50% farther than the ordinary mosquitoe. Beating their wing 500 times a second provides them with extra speed, and the larger bodies (by 0.3ug) presumably allow larger bloodsucking capacity." And in a similar vein (har har) New Scientist had a piece about what mosquitoes like or hate about people.

14 of 458 comments (clear)

  1. Makes no sense by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this is happening due to many humans being in even smaller spaces, why the hell does the insect need color vision, and the ability to smell humans from even FARTHER away? I don't see how that need could have evolved to be beneficial... the speed thing I can see... I'm truly confused as to why such a feature would evolve with seemingly no benefit.

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  2. As one of the luck few... by Jhon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Some unfortunate people are irresistible to mosquitoes, while the scent of some lucky individuals drives the blood-suckers away.
    ...
    A key chemical identified by Logan as a repellent is also "a natural food additive, so has proven safety", he says. "And because it can be made by plants, it may one day be possible to mass produce it cheaply."
    Great. So lets breed mosquitoes which aren't repelled by us lucky few. Wonderful.
  3. Patents... by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The most potent repellent chemical were then isolated by strapping miniature electrodes to the antennae of female mosquitoes and checking their responses to specific compounds. Logan will not divulge the names of the chemicals until they are patented.

    How in the world can a chemical that every human produces be patented? Isn't that prior art? Ridiculous. I could understand if it were some new compound they synthesized, but this is a nothing more than greed.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Patents... by oni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He did the work to figure it out, he deserves the exclusive right FOR A LIMITED TIME to manufacture it. After that, it goes into the public domain.

      Without that protection, his recipe would be a closely guarded secret and there is the possibility that his death, or a fire in the factory, or a hard drive crash, would result in the formula being lost. Then we all lose. That's the way things used to work, and that's why we can't make violins as good as Stradivarius, or swords out of damascus steel (or buildings out of it for that matter).

      Patents do benefit mankind. It's not this guy's fault that politicians have perverted the system.

    2. Re:Patents... by paulpach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If noone is able to make a profit out of isolating this chemical, then wtf would they invest in it? The alternatives are simple: * Either you let people patent and make a profit out of a chemical that the human (or non human) body produces, or * Noone bothers isolating the chemical and no human ever benefits from such research. Note that many chemicals are produced by bacterias and mushroms and ppl have just isolated them, patented them and sold them in pills. Your prior art argument would also apply to these. Thanks to that research and attached profit, we are able to treat hundreds of illneses today. Reality is noone will invest millions of dollars "for the good of mankind".

    3. Re:Patents... by dgatwood · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, according to patent law, he doesn't deserve anything. Patent law does not recognize a discovery as an invention. They can patent a particular means of synthesizing this chemical or extracting it from some other animal or plant, but they cannot and should not be able to patent the discovery itself. Patenting the chemical would be like discovering that you can make some particular type of object out of wood and then patenting trees.

      If they get a patent on this discovery, it will be quite possibly the ultimate affront to God and humanity. Don't be surprised if their lab gets struck by lightning repeatedly (in the same place).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Patents... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you propose to enforce his exclusive right to manufacture it when every living human being on the planet is manufacturing it to greater or lesser degrees with their own natural biological processes already?

  4. 'Compares favorably' to DEET? by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Generally when somebody says their all-natural product 'compares favorably' to some chemical alternative, them mean that it works 'almost as well'. If it worked better, they'd be saying that it works better than DEET.

    In my experience, DEET does absolutely nothing to repel biting insects from me. If this new stuff 'compares favorably' to DEET, I guess I have nothing to look forward to here.

    It doesn't really have to work though... He just needs to put 'Organic' on the bottle, and people will buy it even if they have no clue what the hell is in there. They'll swear it works too.

  5. Size? by KingEomer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much larger is a 3 microgram mosquito? I think a percentage would be slightly more informative, or at least the weight of a "normal" mosquito.

  6. Re:why not earlier? by bar-agent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But don't worry, pretty soon people will be complaining about the glut of birds feeding on the skeeters followed by the glut of cats eating the birds, followed by....

    And then the gorillas freeze to death?

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  7. Re:Size? (oops) by KingEomer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So that means that the mosquitoes are about 0.1% bigger than average... Wow. North Americans must be pretty dangerous, then, if 0.1% larger in weight makes one "Super"

  8. Or, we could just use DDT and there's no problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bring back DDT and mosquitos go away. So do upwards of 2 million malaria deaths per year, a totally preventable third-world genocide caused entirely by that evil idiot Rachel Carson and perpetuated by environmentalist morons.

  9. Re:Natural Resistance to Venom? by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    after I figured they had enough blood, I would pick them off by the leg and let them fly away.

    There's merit to what you say, as I became immune to poison ivy, likely from all the contact i had with it, but posion ivy won't give you a host of diseases if you come in contact with it, which a mosquito might.

  10. Re:Color vision by larkost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just a small note: most mammals are bichromats (except a large swath of primates, including us... and we are just barely trichromats). But most other land vertebrates are quadchromats. There is a nice article on this in the latest Scientific American. Note that this is in the print edition, and so the full article is not available free online.