Nanotube Lube Replenishment for Massive Drives
PetManimal writes "Techworld reports that Seagate has just patented something called 'Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording,' which features nanotechnology and could lead to a 1.46TB 2.5-in. drive. The article says 'Storing data properly in extremely small areas requires the magnetic material to be heated during the writing phase, but this causes the lubricant film deposited on top of the magnetized recording layer to evaporate. Seagate's patent resolves this problem by having a reservoir inside the disk casing that contains nanotube-based lubricant. Some of this is periodically pumped out as a vapor and deposited on the surface of the disk, replenishing the evaporated lubricant.'"
Some of this is periodically pumped out as a vapor and deposited on the surface of the disk, replenishing the evaporated lubricant.
Hey, I could use some of this this! Oh wait...it says disk...
This guy's the limit!
Lube replenishment?
For.... massive drives?
Some headlines just write themselves. And don't mod me down, you were thinking about how cool it would be to have a peripheral that would do that - this is slashdot, don't lie!
Can I get the KY Jelly version to store all my pr0n?
"No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
I wonder if this will lower the mean time to failure of these drives? I currently have some old 9G scsi disks that have been running daily since 1998/1999 and still work flawlessly. How much lube are they putting in these drives? It seems to me this could be bad thing(tm) put enough lube in for 3 years, and every 3 years sell new drives.
oogly boogly!
So when we see the warranty on those disk, it won't be 1 year, it'll be 8760 hours. I mean, talk about throw-away society. These things would come with probably extremely toxic non-refillable containers that are guaranteed to be emptied out at the most inopportune moment.
Does everything include nothing?
so when the resivoir empties, your 1.5TB of data evaporates with whatever is left over of the nanotubes?
.. But, after reading about this days ago, I was under the impression the lubricant itself wasn't 'nanotube based' but rather was distributed across the platters in a controlled fashion via nanotubes. Insofar that the tubes themselves only allow a certain, small, amount of the lubricant to escape and only when the absence of lubricant on the surface produces enough differential pressure to allow it.
And, incidentally, the ten year life of the lubricant reservoir should be sufficient IMHO. I can't imagine in ten years we'll still be using the same hard drives anyway. I think Seagate is banking on it.
TLF
I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
--
So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's Sister?
Digital pron? Check
1.46 TB? Check
Lube Replenishment ? Check
Ok, confession time. Who's already masturbating to this article?
and oh yeah so after whatever date 5 10 yrs (whatever they decided to supply the tubes for the drive will be done it appears.
actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
everything starts to look like it needs a Nano Assisted Information Lubricant
Is density really the problem ?
We need FASTER access times.
We need multiple read/write heads.
Hardware patents == O.K.
Software patents == evil.
At least to the OSS community.
See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
These are 1998 vintage Sun 9G and no-name 9G ATA drives. Still running. Many more 1999-vintage 9G's out there, maybe 5% of our total. Still useful for such clusterable "applicance" applications as DNS servers. Nevertheless, when the machine dies (more likely due to a 99-cent CPU fan locking up) we just chuck the whole machine.
Considering that the latest drives are far more reliable than those old crappy things, a finite 10-year life for a disk drive is definitely Planned Obsolescence for Filling Up Landfills. Bah!
If they will offer a liberal trade-in allowance for recycling, then OK. Pretty much 100% of our disks are mirrored anyway.
Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
Then, you "get lubricated".
And everyone has been complaining about the limited number of write cycles of flash memory.
Looks like the technogies are reach equivalence by making Hard drives worse !
I know I'm a little dense, but where would the lubricant evaporate to?
I mean the HDs built today are sealed to prevent dust and moisture from coming in. wouldn't it also prevent moisture from leaving?
If the lubricant condenses to the lid, it would seem there would be a way to capture and recycle it. You shouldn't have to run out.
Better yet let it run in a lubricant bath - then you avoid evaporation and application of it all together.
-CF