Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Open XML Project A Short-Term Fix

TechPro writes "In an interview with eWeek the managing director of the ODF Alliance (Marino Marcich) was pretty dismissive of Microsoft's Open XML Translator project. While the move was a recognition of the ODF Format's acceptance by government's around the world, the installable software plug-ins that would be created under the project were really 'only a bridge, a stopgap measure that will probably not be acceptable to government's around the world over the long term. Plug-ins simply don't give the benefits of open file formats and standards,' he said."

2 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. I don't understand how it is different. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From TFA:
    Converters and plug-ins are not solutions to the problem as governments across the globe want access to their vital records and data and are looking to separate the document from the application, which plug-in technologies do not do, and which would open the market up to greater innovation and more product and price competition, he said.
    I don't understand the problem. If it's a plug-in, and it reads and writes to the ODF standard, where is the problem?

    The only thing I can think of is if people worry about a Microsoft "upgrade" breaking this plug-in. And then having to wait for the patch to the plug-in.
    The translators would also not be perfect, Jean Paoli, general manager for interoperability and XML architecture at Microsoft, told eWEEK, as "OpenXML and ODF are very different formats and some hard decisions are going to have to be made when translating from one format to another, like where we have OpenXML features that are not supported in ODF."
    Excuse me, but, fuck "translating". This isn't about "translating". This is about being able to read ODF files and save your work to the ODF format.

    "Translating" only comes into play when you're talking about:
    a. Converting all your previous work to a new format.

    b. When some people you are communicating with are restricted to the .docX format and you use the ODF format. But that's not a problem if the ODF format is the standard format.

    c. And Microsoft's "Open" XML format will only be available in their NEXT release so it won't affect anyone who is still using their current or a previous release.

    Am I missing something, somewhere?

    Microsoft's claims seem to center around an organization upgrading to the next release of MS Office and then migrating to the ODF format.

    While I see most situations as an organization migrating to the ODF format from an existing installation of MS Office 2000 or previous.
  2. Re:Java Redux by Jesus_666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OpenOffice has already broken from the ODF spec to accomplish some things.

    Interesting. Care to elaborate/give a link?

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)