Slashdot Mirror


SUSE Linux Becomes openSUSE

houghi writes "With the anouncement of the release of SUSE Linux 10.2 Alpha 2 there is also an anouncement that SUSE Linux will be renamend to openSUSE. A very logical step to clear things up. The name went from S.u.S.E over SuSE to SUSE Linux and for many people it was not clear what the name realy was. It also points out the importance Novell gives the the openness of the whole openSUSE project."

17 of 55 comments (clear)

  1. I could swear that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I could swear that it's been called that for a little while now. I downloaded it a few weeks ago, and it was reffered to as "openSUSE" on their website then. Old news?

    1. Re:I could swear that... by Chaotic+Spyder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yes yes.. It has been using the same name since 10.0

      --
      Losers whine about their best, Winners go home to fuck the prom queen
  2. This doesn't affect SLED and SLES by michael+path · · Score: 5, Informative

    Summary is a bit misleading....

    With current naming we experienced confusion internally and externally
    between the project openSUSE and the distribution created there. And
    especially with the new naming of our Linux business products (SUSE
    Linux Enterprise 10) the differentiation between our business products
    and community/consumer product is not intuitive. Therefor the upcoming
    community/consumer version will be named openSUSE 10.2. We'll
    implement first name changes with Alpha 3 starting directly after
    Alpha 2 and will have a fully renamed distribution with Beta 1 in Nov.


    The SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 and SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 are keeping their names.

    This seems to illustrate yet again the issues Novell has had for the last decade with their product marketing - how can they develop brand loyalty when they keep changing the product names?

    Had they left the Novell Linux Desktop name and replaced the SUSE Linux Enterprise Server with Novell Linux Server or Novell Linux Enterprise Server, wouldn't they have been able to distinguish the community versions against the enterprise versions much easier?

    Novell's seemingly quarterly change in nomenclature and direction is baffling.

    1. Re:This doesn't affect SLED and SLES by Azarael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which was why in my mind they should have just kept the Ximian name in the first place.

    2. Re:This doesn't affect SLED and SLES by badfish99 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's worse: everyone knew what "Novell" was, and didn't want it.

    3. Re:This doesn't affect SLED and SLES by michael+path · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a lot different - most people were first introduced to Firefox, not its previous incarnations. Moreover, most people didn't have to invest money or remarkable effort to find out what Firefox was all about - being a free download for Windows and all.

      If a product is important enough, it can obviously survive a change in name. I have a hard time believing that the latest Novell line of Linux solutions are going to prove as important or interesting as Firefox has unless it becomes THE flagship OS for new servers and desktops.

  3. That clears everything up. by rowama · · Score: 3, Funny

    I now feel better about my decision to consider possibly maybe eventually switching to openSuSE.

  4. What are the ramifications? by kimvette · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does this mean that the following will no longer be bundled and have to be downloaded separately?

      - Real Player
      - Planmaker
      - Textmaker
      - Java (and dependent packages)
      - Opera]
      - ATI drivers
      - NVidia drivers

    Yeah, I know, CD #6 contains some of the extras, but it sure is nice to get them all on one DVD like the retail SuSE has offered. It's more convenient than OpenSuSE has been.

    I've been buying the retail version of SuSE for a few years now, and really like it, even with the problems the distribution has had from time to time. I hope that this move doesn't change anything for the worse.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  5. Exactly. by Jack+Johnson · · Score: 2, Informative

    As usual, Novell lacks focus and can't figure out how to name or version their products properly.

    Forgive me if I'm wrong about some of these. I work with these products every day and I don't even know exactly how to differentiate everything. In the last few years we've had...

    -NNLS (Novel Nterprise Linux Services), a package of Novell Services like eDirectory for use on Linux.

    -OES (Open Enterprise Server Linux and Open Enterprise Server NetWare) They are both called OES by Novell. The NetWare version is basically NetWare 6.5 and the original Linux version was SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9. Obviously, OES L and OES N are very different. I think Novell used this naming to give people a false sense of security in sticking with NetWare based systems a little longer while they got their Linux act together.

    -SLES (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server) - SLES and OES are used interchangably by Novell employees and some documentation even though SLES didn't have the components on disk to be OES until SLES 9.

    -NLD9 (Novell Linux Desktop 9), based on SUSE 9.

    -SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop), the new name for NLD and when it switched to SUSE 10.

    -SUSE 10 OSS (The open sourced version of SUSE 10), this is now openSUSE it seems.

    Before this we had...

    -DirXML which became Identity Manager overnight with a major revision.

    -NDS, NDS 8 and eDirectory 8 and eDirectory. eDirectory 8.5 is newer than NDS 8, it's module version is v85.x versus v8.77. Though, Prior to eDirectory 8.5 it was eDirectory 8.3 which used module v8.3. With eDirectory 8.6 the module versioning was changed entirely v10110.xx and incremented from there.

  6. Re:CapitalizAtion by dhfx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The lower-case 'u' came about because in German it's the abbreviation for 'und' - the equivalent of an ampersand. So when you see SuSE you can think S&SE.

  7. I hadn't realised... by HaloZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that it was called S.u.S.E. at one point. Did it stand for something?

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:I hadn't realised... by enitime · · Score: 5, Informative
      it was called S.u.S.E. at one point. Did it stand for something?


      "Software und SystemEntwicklung" = "Software and System Development" in German.

  8. Re:CapitalizAtion by jtobin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, capitalization is important. It's the difference between "I helped Uncle Jack off his horse" and "I helped uncle jack off his horse".

  9. Re:CapitalizAtion by Kelson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The "confusion" I was referring to was in terms of spelling. FireFox is misspelled. Firefox is spelled correctly. When people are used to mixed case, they can get confused as to whether a particular name is spelled with conventional (just one capital) rules, camel case, rules from another language (as another poster pointed out, the original S.u.S.E. capitalization comes from German). "I know one of the letters in SUSE isn't capitalized, which one is it?"

    When I'm writing formally, I still can't decide what to do with names like iMac, eBay, etc. at the beginning of a sentence -- and those are names I know how to spell.

    So no, I'm not saying that people calling it "FireFox" get confused by people calling it "Firefox." You could probably write "Fyrefawkes" and still get the idea across. But the large number of mixed-case names in the computing field has led to confusion about how the name is spelled.

    As it is, I think making the "open" part lowercase is still asking for trouble, but "openSUSE" is at least a bit more standard than "openSuSE." Me, I would have gone for "OpenSUSE" or even "Open SUSE."

  10. Shouldn't that be... by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    GNU/openSUSE?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  11. Re:Not going for the bait. by michael+path · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, you're dead on. They decided to do some crazy things with the installation and package management starting with 10.1.

    10.0 was nice as it was released. However, there's a lot of things that were needed in 10.1 to make it unusable. It made no sense for it to be a minor revision, as it was a major overhaul.

  12. Open, SUSAME by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this name supposed to be a reference to Ali Baba and the forty theives?

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.