Slashdot Mirror


Tom's Hardware Reviews ATI and Nvidia on Linux

Beuno writes "I stumbled upon a GeForce vs Radeon review on Tom's Hardware, which seems normal enough. The big surprise is that it was actually a comparison of those two video cards on Linux (Fedora Core 5). The review isn't as thorough as I would like, but it does review all aspects ranging from tools available, complexity of getting them to work and benchmarks on performance. To me, this is a clear signs of Linux finally making a long expected breakthrough into common desktops."

25 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Compatibility... by ChowRiit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe this trend will have all game manufacturers making their games Linux compatible too? (As opposed to having to run them through emulators like Wine and Cedega)...

    I know I'd move properly from XP if this were the case, and I suspect a lot of gamers feel the same way - there are a large portion that only use XP because getting the games to run under Linux is such a hassle.

    We can but hope...

    1. Re:Compatibility... by Billy+the+Impaler · · Score: 4, Informative

      WINE and Cedega are not emulators, rather, they implement a compatibility layer. Cedega is a proprietary fork of WINE that has more advanced DirectX implementation.

    2. Re:Compatibility... by 0racle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hm, 5x12=120? You went to an American school didn't you, or do you live on some other planet that has 24 months in a year?

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:Compatibility... by julesh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Emulation is when you would say, run a PPC program on i386 Processor. Itercepting system calls is not emulation.

      Yes it is, at least if you do it in order to imitate a different system. The word "emulate" means "behave in a fashion that imitates". Stop trying to redefine it to some restrictive use that would be better of being called "simulation".

  2. No thanks... by pdbaby · · Score: 3, Funny

    No thanks... I'll wait for the 300 page Toms Hardware revi-oh. I see.

    --
    Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    1. Re:No thanks... by just_forget_it · · Score: 3, Funny

      DOH, i meant..
      I *next page* love *next page* reading *next page* Tom's Hardware *next page* articles, *next page* they *next page* are so *next page* informative.

  3. Linux on the desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is all very well but Linux's big breakthrough on the desktop won't come until we can play Duke Nukem Forever on Linux.

    1. Re:Linux on the desktop by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are you talking about? It plays exactly the same on Linux as it does on Windows. Just as easy to install, and even the exact same framerate.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:Linux on the desktop by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Just as easy to install, and even the exact same framerate.

      I've found, on the same hardware, that GTA: Vice City runs *smoother* with higher graphics settings in Cedega on Linux than natively in Windows. That really surprised me.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    3. Re:Linux on the desktop by MrHanky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe because Linux uses less RAM than Windows XP, or uses virtual memory better? Nvidia's driver code should be more or less the same, and there's no chance that cedega speeds up directx by converting it to OpenGL. I've had very good experiences with running Championship Manager under wine, and that's just a huge database.

    4. Re:Linux on the desktop by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Check your RAM usage - for a lot of modern games under Windows, goig from 512meg to 1gig makes a considerable difference. Going from (say) 250 meg free to 350meg free is likely to have a noticeable effect too. I'd imagine that your Linux install uses less RAM than your Windows one, assuming you have third party firewall and anti-virus software under Windows.

  4. 2007 it is! by QCompson · · Score: 4, Funny

    To me, this is a clear signs of Linux finally making a long expected breakthrough into common desktops.

    Yes, how can anyone doubt that 2007 will be the year of linux on the desktop?

    1. Re:2007 it is! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well I won't believe it until Netcraft confirms it! ;-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  5. Performance issues by also-rr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Generally performance running games on Linux has been a mixed bag (on the same hardware).

    NWN, WoW and UT have all been slightly faster than the Windows version, and crashes have been less of a problem (ctrl-alt-f1, kill task, no need to reboot - which _is_ required for some reason under Windows as games seem to offer best performance off a fresh reboot... resource recovery problems in the DirectX subsystem maybe?)

    On the other hand EVE runs slower, with more graphical artifacts. Yes I'm aware that this is because it doesn't play that nicely with WINE and the fact that it runs in a playable fashion is a small miracle. It is still the case that if you want the best performance then you have to play it on Windows, for now.

  6. let them do a Notebook comparison and see ATI fall by Locutus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...on their face. Most laptops with ATI Mobility Express chipsets can't use the onboard video memory. ATI broke this a year ago and has not fixed it.

    So don't trust ATI for Linux capabilities on notebooks.

    Maybe Toms Hardware can do a notebook comparison since they've already done the desktop. I'm pretty sure that would expose this failure to far more than the few who already are aware of this. And just maybe, it'll get ATI to fix this.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  7. quite good article by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 3, Funny

    They even mentioned DRI.

  8. Re:let them do a Notebook comparison and see ATI f by killpog · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yup, I agree. No comparison yet. I advise all my clients not to buy ATI. They will not respond to requests for support, and refuse to acknowlege any bugs. They disgust me.

  9. ATI, Linux, and Apple by miyako · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've always used nVidia cards, which have always worked well for me under Linux. I've never tried getting an ATI card to work because I've never heard anything other than it was sheer agony to use an ATI card under Linux.
    In general, this is fine. If a hardware vendor doesn't support my OS, then I will buy from a vendor who does. In this case, nVidia hovers between "almost as good as" and "slightly better than" ATI, depending on who has most recently released a new video card, so it's not a big compromise.
    I do find ATIs lack of Linux support to be disappointing now however, because those of us interested on running Linux on an intel mac are stuck with a choice between ATI and an embedded crappy video card.
    Incidentally, has anyone had any luck getting Linux to dual boot with OS X on one of the newer iMacs? I'm interested in getting one, but until Autodesk offers an Intel Mac version of Maya I'm stuck on Linux (and actually, even if there were an Intel Mac version, I'm not sure I want to pay the fee to transfer my license from Linux to Mac) so I can't justify getting a new machine unless it can run Linux well with good 3D support.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    1. Re:ATI, Linux, and Apple by matrixhax0r · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a new opensource driver for ATI cards. As you may already know, ATI released code and documentation for their old r200 and r100 based cards. Then the opensource community used that information to write opensource drivers which are now found in X11-DRM and Mesa.

      However, for r300 and up, ATI wanted to force users to use their proprietary drivers which have really sucked so far. Never fear! There's the r300 project currently in development that aims to add support for these more modern cards. What started as an invididual project (http://r300.sourceforge.net/R300.php), is now fully integrate into the the offical DRM and Mesa development trees.

      Although the r300 driver is not in the offical DRM nor Mesa releases yet, the are in the CVS tree.
      DRM - cvs.freedesktop.org:/cvs/dri checkout drm
      Mesa - cvs.freedesktop.org:/cvs/mesa checkout Mesa
      There are quite a few guides on compiling and using these sources. I recomend checking the Gentoo Forums. They support EXA and Xorg 7.1 (unlike current ATI / nVidia drivers IIRC). In fact I'm using them as I'm typing this.

      Performance is not nearly the speed of the binary drivers. However, I can still play UT2K4/Doom 3, so it's good enough. It looks very promising and is likely to get must faster in the future. It seems very stable and I haven't had a video driver crash since I started using them (around Xorg 7.01 release).

      --
      If it's no on fire, it's a hardware problem.
  10. Ah yes by gowen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because hundreds of Desktop apps require 3D accelerated drivers.

    Like erm ... err ... erm ... you know.
    Oh, 3D rendering. I mean, everyone in my office spends all day doing 3D rendering.

    Clue : if the speed at which windows are blitted to the screen is the rate determining step in you workflow, you're probably not getting paid enough.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  11. hm by joe+155 · · Score: 3, Informative

    From TFA: "Acquiring Nvidia drivers seldom entails more than consulting a package repository for your Linux distribution of choice, and instructing local package management facilities to fetch, build, and install all required files and dependencies."

    Well, support for Nvidia isn't supported on FC5 because it is non-free, so you won't find it in the standard repositories using yum... if you add livna you can do "yum install kmod-nvidia -y" which will handle it all... but it is important not to use the Nvidia ones because they overwrite sections of your X and can cause problems, especially if you change you card later. More info can be found here; http://stanton-finley.net/fedora_core_5_installati on_notes.html#nVidia... just wanted to get the message out there to protect the penguins

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
  12. Re:Linux on desktops? by MrCopilot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In 2006 a Linux machine with a vidocard is a geek's hobby, a curiosity, nothing more.

    Excellent troll my friend. Explain http://www.desktoplinux.com/index.html

    Out of the 4 Desktops and 1 laptop in my home, 2 dual-boot, 3 are full time Linux.(All Debian) All of them gamers.

    With an NVidia Graphics card Linux is a viable desktop. For work, web and Leisure.

    Free Software is not a hobby, it is a way of life.

    I look forward to the money I will save and you will spend on Vista. I look forward to the knowledge I will gain and you will be ignorant of. I look forward to modifying my system and my code to my liking, while you look forward to being locked out, broken apps and slashed features, and unsolvable crashes. (lest I forget the required reboots and reinstalls)

    To each his own.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  13. But other sites have been doing this for a while by loftwyr · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can always get good info on hardware under linux on Phoronix. They've got lots of experience with linux builds and games and wine to give good information.

  14. NVidia owners - Please help out Nouveaux project! by Hobart · · Score: 3, Informative


    This seems like a good on-topic thread in which to mention the freedesktop.org (X.org folks) effort to write a 100% open source 3D driver for the NVidia cards -- nouveau

    http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/

    If you're an owner of an nVidia card, please do all you can to help contribute! They appear to be suprisingly far along.

    --
    Slashcode bug # 497457 - unfixed since December 2001 - Go look it up!

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  15. Re:let them do a Notebook comparison and see ATI f by laffer1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are other reasons to buy nVidia. They actually support OTHER open source operating systems. (FreeBSD, Solaris) I can play some games under FreeBSD 6 like Enemy Territory quite nicely using the nvidia binary drivers. The binary drivers got me to buy my first nVidia card ever. I'm rather impressed with it considering its not even one of their more recent cards (only fx5200). xorg support sucks above 9200 chipsets as their is no 3d acceleration. I only wish nvidia made their own video cards like ati does. I've had bad luck with some oem cards. (one nvidia and several ati)