Slashdot Mirror


Former MS Employees Explore OSS

Roberto Andressi writes "A few former Microsoft employees have launched a Web site that evaluates open-source projects. The site is intended as a way for first-time OSS users to 'get their feet wet' before diving into the large community of open source projects out there. The site, Ohloh, will provide background information on a prospective project. The folks behind the site even plan to include a lexicon of terms for very new users. " From the article: "'We collect from the infrastructure the open-source community uses to develop the software,' Ohloh co-founder and CEO Scott Collison told CNET News.com. 'It also serves as an open-source directory. You can find open-source projects and compare them, and gradually find one that's right for you.' The site could appeal to developers who are frustrated by the number of open-source projects that lack clear explanations. Ohloh also seeks to help developers make a build vs. buy decision by offering code analysis, said Collison, who along with co-founder Jason Allen, previously worked at Microsoft."

7 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. A reminder for all companies by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Treat your employees well. They will still be around for a long time after they leave your company (unless, of course, your company is the mafia)

    --
    Your ad could be here!
  2. Re:Why link to ZDNET Asia? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The big problem with a lot of OSS project sites is the lack of basic information about what the software even *IS*. A lot of open source project sites feature build information, lists of patch fixes, etc. on their main page--all without ever explaining the basic info that people (esp. non-technical people) need to know. The are so into explaining the "how" of the software that they negelect to explain the "what" and "for who."

    The lack of documentation on OSS projects is bad enough without having to spend an hour just trying to figure out what the software even DOES.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. SIgn me up! by shmert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm most excited about a central place that does code reveiw of open-source projects. That's really a tedious process when you're wading around in sourceforge trying to find a shared lib for your project. Usually you can tell by the level of polish applied to the project's website how organized the code will be, but I'm certain some well-engineered software gets passed over if this is your only criteria for quality. Someone designing an open-source product shouldn't need to design a flashy website to promote it.

    If there were a comprehensive site I could visit that had evaluated (albeit briefly) some of these packages, that could be a big time-saver.

    --
    You drank my drink, you drunk!
  4. Re:Why link to ZDNET Asia? by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's ironic (considering this new site) that Microsoft has plenty to say about what their software is but lack in useful documentation. It's literally the opposite of OSS. Microsoft provides pleny of marketing to make sure everyone knows what they offer, yet for the technical they offer little help.

  5. Re:ho | Ho by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that tinfoil hat is quite shiny enough.

  6. Re:Why link to ZDNET Asia? by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why should they? What's the incentive? All most developers want to do is develope software and *if* it helps someone else, great, take a copy. It's not like they make more $$ for every customer who runs it. In fact, there's a big *disincentive* to inviting the clueless in - then the devs have to spend more time answering annoying newbie FAQ's over and over, troubleshoot their installation problems, etc. If the FOSS world, the more clueful users the better; the more clueless the worse. Ergo, if you don't know what it is, you probably don't want it. FOSS: you've got to *want* it - there are no marketeers out there trying to hunt down customers, ship them product and debit their account.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  7. Re:As Ackbar would say: by Jimmy+King · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "WTF is that all about? Are these people perhaps trying to suggest that open-source software is valuable, and that its developers should charge for it?" Stage 1: Establish tht open source has a cost in real money. Stage 2: Get Hired as consultants by microsoft to state this in press releases. .... well, you know the tune
    I don't think that's what they're going for. I think it's a more good intentioned "this is a rough estimate of what this software is worth if you were to develop it/this is what it cost the people who are now providing it to you". Of course, I can't imagine how it's accurate... are they figuring a 40 hr work week just on that software for each person involved for however long it's been in development? Are they using some estimate based on software is X lines of code and on average a developer can write Y lines of code per day/week/month/year?