Slashdot Mirror


Browser Comparison - Firefox 2 b1, IE7 b3, Opera 9

mikemuch writes "The browser wars have heated up again, with Microsoft putting Beta 3 of Internet Explorer 7 out for all to download (not just developers anymore), Firefox coming out with the first beta of its version 2, and Opera releasing version 9. ExtremeTech has a shoot-out of the three browsers, with feature comparisons and tests of resource usage, startup time, and Acid2 standards compliance. Standout features are Opera's built-in BitTorrent support, Firefox's spellchecker for forms, and IE's Quick Tabs view. Firefox is still ahead in extensions, while Opera has some slick UI conveniences."

5 of 528 comments (clear)

  1. my views by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am a firefox user but have all three installed. I like the firefox spellcheck since I am a lousy speller and the Opera torrent downloading since there are times legal downloads are only available in torrent and I do not want the full install. For some reason, msie just seems cleaner. Forget netscape.

    The only problem I am having with any of the three is with the firefox beta 2.0 crashing with Vista. The last alpha version did not.

    Its going to be an interesting battle.

  2. "Favorites button" by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 5, Interesting

    MSIE: Yes
    Firefox: No
    Opera: No

    wtf is a "Favorites button" button? Is it like a bookmark button?

  3. Memory usage charts wrong by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Their memory usage charts cannot possibly be right:

    Memory Usage Loading Six Tabs
    Firefox 2 Beta 1: 73K
    Internet Explorer 7 Beta 3: 70K
    Opera 9.0: 52K
    IE 6.0: 155K
    Firefox 1.5.0.4: 56K

    A single image on one of those pages could require more RAM than what the entire program is consuming. That's way, way off. What's even more amazing is, going by their charts, Opera actually consumes LESS ram with 6 pages loaded than when it first starts up! 53k -> 52k

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  4. Re:Searching from the address bar by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What do you possibly gain by having a separate search box? I just don't get it.

    Indeed, you don't.

    If I have a host named "porn" on my network, and I type "porn" into the address bar, I better damn well get the host I want and not some search.

    We have a host named "pegasus" and I can't tell you how many times I've been to the pegasus mail web site and didn't want to be.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  5. Opera gets no respect by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I like Opera. I use Opera. I read the comparison, and Opera looks to come out favorably. Then I read the comments. Firefox compared to IE, again and again. Reasons why Firefox is better. Reasons why IE is better. Reasons why more people use IE. But there are fewer comments on Opera. I can't understand why. It has lots of things that Firefox needs extenstions for built right in (and without significant differences in resources), and some things, like bittorrent support, that aren't available in any extension. It has better standards compliance than the other two. It has Widgets (like extensions) if you want to expand it more. But yet, a 3-way comparison is treated as a 2-way comparison. I thought this would be more of an eye opener, "Wow, I didn't know Opera did all that and did it better than the other browsers!" But instead, the comments read like the posters glanced at the IE and Firefox pages of the article (if they read it at all) and hopped right back on the IE vs Firefox war. I find it sad that a competitive browser receives to little consideration, especially from a group that is supposedly early adopters.