Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Facebook Un-Ban, Exploding Laptop, FFXI II

Slashback tonight brings some clarifications, and updates to previous Slashdot stories including, Kent State Facebook ban reversed, exploding laptop old news to Dell, XM moves to dismiss RIAA suit, J2EE death greatly exaggerated, and Square's next MMOG not FFXI II -- Read on for details.

Kent State Facebook ban reversed. Corvaith writes "Just a few days after it was originally noted that Kent State University had banned athletes from posting on Facebook, the Kent Stater announced that the ban was reversed. From the article: 'The athletic department had previously expressed concern about athletes' personal information being available to the public, allowing for possible stalking situations. They were also concerned about athletes displaying inappropriate information on their profiles.' But, in the end, they 'had a change of heart after reviewing the privacy measures available on Facebook.' Athletes must now lock their profiles to friends only."

Exploding laptop old news to Dell? Anonymous writes "CRN is reporting that Dell had about a dozen reports of burned laptops before they announced last year's battery recall. The recall was launched in response to a exploding laptop caught on film at a Japanese conference. Dozens more cases popped up with apparently severe overheating, melted cases, etc., according to the report."

XM moves to dismiss RIAA suit. mikesd81 writes "Apparently, XM is asking a judge to dismiss a a copy right law suit brought by the recording industry. The law suit is over the ipod-like device that can store up to 50 hours of music. XM Satellite said the 1992 Home Recording Audio act protects it from being sued over its $400 handheld device. From the article: 'In a court filing, XM Satellite said the 1992 protections represent Congress' efforts to insure that the powerful recording industry would not be able to restrict the right of consumers to record songs that are broadcast over the radio or stifle innovation by chilling the development and use of the latest recording technologies.'"

J2EE death greatly exaggerated. Peter writes "A recent Burton Group report has stated that the Java Enterprise Edition platform is 'dying due to its complexity and lack of suitability for SOA.' Major vendors supporting JEE have responded with rebuttals, stating that the complexity has arisen due to customer needs and that it is well positioned for companies to build SOA solutions on."

Square's next MMOG not FFXI II. Despite some of the rumblings around the net, it appears that the next MMOG to come out of Square will not be a sequel to the popular FFXI. While Square may have shot down this rumor, the question still remains, what MMO are they working on?

10 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Square and MMOs by Durrok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Square's next MMOG not FFXI II.

    Thank God. While I did play some of the MMOFF and enjoyed it this is not what Square does best. I hope they return to their roots and release a game with innovative game elements and a great story line. Oh, and for the love of God, NO DANCE SPHERES.

    --
    I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    1. Re:Square and MMOs by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What square did best was a generic RPG line to make money and then make awesome spin off games. Saddly spin offs from the FF line seem rarer and rarer these days when they're the best part.

      Also the next MMORPG should be based on Crystal chronicles, there isn't anyone alive who could tell me CC wouldn't make for an original MMORPG with some intresting elements like having each race focus on different goals. For example you could use people who keep the roads clear and safe for caravans, you'd have to travel the land and fight off any monsters who try to ambush caravans and such.

      PvP could be about robbing caravans if they wanted it too. Would make an intresting way to play if nothing else.

      There is already a set of 10 jobs with different skills linked to them in the CC world. All they have to do is expand on these jobs and make it possible for people to use them and have it be fun.

      Hell it could be the next Star wars galaxy (pre screwing) and it would have cute characters to appeal to the old school fans/teenage girls alike!

      --
      I like muppets.
  2. Facebook Ban by betterthanducttape · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ironically enough, for the last few days Facebook.com would have been a good site to ban. One of their ad banners was loaded with a virus, and it took them quite a while to fix it. It was a trojan with a .wmf extension. Thankfully, my anti-virus caught it as Firefox attempted to auto-download it for some reason (I suspect FlashGot of being that reason).

  3. J2EE by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can tell you this: I don't program in Java, but I do have to install and support it as part of my job, and I can't think of a more odd set of install criteria than the Java installers.

    For one, we use primarialy redhat-based linux installs for desktop and server, including Fedora, RHEL, and Centos. Sun Java, for reasons that I've never fully understood (something to do with the licensing, and it makes my brain hurt to figure it out) cannot be distributed with Linux distros. Or, that's what I thought, but then I heard that Mepis comes with java installed and working. See? Wierd already. But, at any rate, when you install a RH-based Linux install, you get the gnu java. Since I support University professors, most of them have been using Sun's java, and the GNU has (appearantly) enough querks that they don't like using it (same with the g77 fortran, but that's a different story).

    So, at that point, you need to install Java. Which one? Nobody knows. People want to be able to use java plugins in their web browser (more on that in a sec), they want to be able to compile java, and they want to be able to run java apps in some sort of java environment. I think. But which one do you install? Java_jdk, Java_Jre, or Java_j2ee? Some of them include functionality replicated in the others, but there's no like clear-cut FAQ on the java website to tell you which (like, a simple four-column by X row table with the distros across the top and the expected functionality down the left side, and X's or O's, or green and red squares, to indicate which versions include which functionality). If you independantly read the descriptions, it's a LOT of buzzwords, and very short on substance.

    Then, there's the "where does it install" question. They distribute as binaries, so you just kind of chmod u+x file; ./file and cross your fingers. Sometimes it's /usr/java/bin/java, sometimes, it's /usr/bin/java, sometimes it's /usr/local/java, sometimes it's /usr/local/bin/java, sometimes it's /opt/SUNWappserver/java/bin/java. Who knows? Good thing all Unix and Linux distro's use exactly the same order in their $PATH and the same file structure and organization. Not to mention, you kind of have to trust that it installs libraries and whatever else in all the correct spots, and is familiar with every linux distro from RHEL to Bob's Discount Linux to create a bazillion symlinks.

    Then, you've got to figure out which one to run. "which java" can yeild any one of 50 outputs, and that's if you don't let users set their own shells and rc scripts. Not to mention, you may end up chasing symlinks down for an hour to find the exact binary (/usr/java -> /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/bin/java -> /usr/local/java/bin/java etc). Oh, and some of the installers are command line and some are X windows required. And I've had trouble with the J2EE 1.4 installer claiming it was out of diskspace on a partition with 60 GB free, aside from all that.

    Then, you have to get it so the plugins run in the web browser. How do you do this? Well, you .... google. There's a file somewhere called libjavaplugin_oji.so, but it could be anywhere. Then you've got to find your firefox or mozilla installation, which could also be anywhere depending on whether you're using the default install, whether the user has run updates, whether the version is a self-compiled version, and what linux distro you're using. Then you have to symlink the object into the plugins folder. What? Come on. You've got to be kidding. There's not a "Download this 4 meg file and stick it here" option? Nope, it relys on 1500 libraries. Oh, and every time you run a full update that also catches firefox, it's going to break (thanks yum). And when you need to update java? Good luck. Here's hoping there's a binary update that knows what it's doing.

    ON TOP OF THAT, on o

    --
    sig?
    1. Re:J2EE by kevin_conaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll do my best to address your concerns

      So, at that point, you need to install Java. Which one? Nobody knows. People want to be able to use java plugins in their web browser (more on that in a sec), they want to be able to compile java, and they want to be able to run java apps in some sort of java environment. I think. But which one do you install? Java_jdk, Java_Jre, or Java_j2ee?

      • JDK: Java Development Kit. Use this to DEVELOP Java software. This comes with a compiler and other Development tools
      • JRE: Java Runtime Environment. Use this to RUN Java software. This will be installed if you need to run someones jar files or when you download the plugin for your web browser
      • J2EE: Java Enterprise Edition. This is for developing Java Software using Enterprise features. This might be confusing for you but its pretty simple. Just think of J2EE as some heavyweight libraries that most users probably don't need or want. Hence the need for a separate spec and download.

      Since you're you seem like an admin, your users will know what they need. I'm guessing the SDK willl do.

      Then, there's the "where does it install" question. They distribute as binaries, so you just kind of chmod u+x file; ./file and cross your fingers. Sometimes it's /usr/java/bin/java, sometimes, it's /usr/bin/java, sometimes it's /usr/local/java, sometimes it's /usr/local/bin/java, sometimes it's /opt/SUNWappserver/java/bin/java. Who knows? Good thing all Unix and Linux distro's use exactly the same order in their $PATH and the same file structure and organization.

      This is more of a sysadmin configuration issue than a java issue. Once you get it installed and configured, you'll be good to go. The same issue happens with a lot of things if you don't watch where you install them

      Then, you've got to figure out which one to run. "which java" can yeild any one of 50 outputs, and that's if you don't let users set their own shells and rc scripts. Not to mention, you may end up chasing symlinks down for an hour to find the exact binary (/usr/java -> /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/bin/java -> /usr/local/java/bin/java etc). Oh, and some of the installers are command line and some are X windows required. And I've had trouble with the J2EE 1.4 installer claiming it was out of diskspace on a partition with 60 GB free, aside from all that.

      Again, this is really more of a sysadmin issue. So far, your complaints have been limited to downloading and installing Java, not even using it! Regardless, if your users must have a specific version of Java, then you should make it clear to those users where it resides on the system. Once its in their path, they're done.

      Then, you have to get it so the plugins run in the web browser. How do you do this?

      Sorry, I'm not really qualified to speak on plugin installation on Linux. On Windows, its an easy install. You really just need to have a JRE (see above) installed and then configure your browser to use it.

      Good grief. If it's this hard just to install and maintain, why would ANYONE ever code in it? From what I can tell, it's major selling point is that it's 1.) object oriented (welcome to the 90's) and 2.) it's cross platform - the same code will compile and work on Windows, Unix, Linux, and Mac. Except that it's not, cause people complain all the time about having to put in exceptions for operating systems and versions of java that do things differently. Are you all gluttons for punishment?

      Its not really that hard to install and maintain, you're just in a semi-unusual "teaching" situation which requires a little bit of finegling to get right

    2. Re:J2EE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As it turns out, you don't need a full J2EE environment to run JSP pages. You just need a servlet engine and a JSP engine that runs on top of it. Apache offers an implementation of just those parts called Tomcat. (It also implements a bunch of other J2EE features, but not the entire system.)

      How the hell are you supposed to figure this out? Beats me. The best way to do it appears to be to complain on a forum about how complicated J2EE is and how stupid it is to require all this complexity just to run something that could be done in 5 lines of PHP code and then get flamed to death because JSPs don't require the rest of J2EE to work.

      Note that JSPs and servlets are both part of J2EE, but they don't require it. (This fits in with Sun's general plan of bundling way the hell too much crap within individual technologies. This is why your rack-mounted server that serves JSP pages will include Java libraries to play MIDI files, two GUI toolkits (one built around the other), two I/O libraries, and two systems for calling methods on remote Java objects. All those are included with J2SE (Standard Edition), and aren't even part of J2EE (Enterprise Edition).)

      Now, because JSP pages are Java source code with HTML embedded directly in them, you do need to make sure you install a JDK and not a JRE. Unless your servlet environment contains a compiler (newer versions of Tomcat do), then you don't. And, while LAMP and .Net use proven server technologies (Apache and IIS), your JSP engine will likely come with its own HTTP server complete with its own vulnerabilities and security flaws. Plus, with the proven performance of Java, you can expect to have half the throughput with twice the resource usage!

      Avoiding Java like the plague probably is the best choice any enterprise can make.

  4. Re:XM?? by Svet-Am · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a Sirius customer. If the RIAA is "so up in arms" about potential copyright infringment from XM's device, why aren't they suing over the Sirius S50? The S50 also allows you to tote MP3s and record Sirius broadcasts. This seems to me like XM pissed of the RIAA somehow and the RIAA is just trying to extract a pound of flesh as "punishment."

    --
    [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
  5. Re:Adblock by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You could've stopped after the AdBlock comment. Flash animation is actually quite popular in its niche communities, and I'm certainly not uninstalling it, or fully disabling Java or JavaScript. I prevent JavaScript doing specific things (thanks Firefox), but small, useful Javascript widgets are just that: harmless.

    This place is too paranoid...

  6. Re:XM?? by Spinn12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We keep asking the same questions over and over about the RIAA. The facts remain - their adgenda is to make as much money as possible, and to stretch the definition of their areas of jurisdiction to do so. It's obvious to all of us on the outside that the RIAA, MPAA and the like all need a revamp of their business models, but you can akin their behavior to intolerance, racism and the like. Now before I get the flaming trolls being shot from catapults, let me explain - Every generation, we see improvements in how we as people behave toward each other. That's because (hopefully) we're learning more with each passing day. But this is a time process. It takes considerable time for a social weeding of anything to happen. Likewise, it will be a time process with the **AA groups, because they're still being led and influenced by the same groups who thought up these now-antiquated ideals. Young blood and new ideas are still shunned, because enough time has not passed for there to be no other option than change. Given time, things have to change. It is a simple rule that all of us potential consumers understand. The one saving grace (and comforting thought) is this - They are not free-thinking, sentient beings, the **AA groups are businesses. As such, they are subject to failure, bankruptcy and other downfalls that are realities to all businesses. If their models and ideas do not change, they will sue themselves out of existence.

  7. Re:XM?? by Squalish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I seem to remember a bitchfest in enthusiast circles when Sirius put major restrictions on the S50's recording capabilities, as well.

    --
    People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation