Slashdot Mirror


Judge Bans Thompson from LA Videogame Case

BluePariah writes "The ever-vigilant folks at Game Politics are reporting that Federal District Court Judge James Brady has refused Jack Thompson's request to file an amicus curiae brief in the lawsuit over Louisiana's videogame law." From the article: "Thompson, of course, was heavily involved in the Louisiana statute, helping Rep. Roy Burrell (D) draft the underlying legislation, HB 1381. The anti-game attorney claimed in his request to the court that Louisiana Attorney General Charles Foti, a named defendant in the case, approved of Thompson's amicus motion. As previously reported here on GamePolitics, Thompson's request to file an amicus brief - if granted - would have permitted the long-time video game industry nemesis to provide information to the court even though he is not a party to the lawsuit."

81 comments

  1. lol pwned by adam.dorsey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good to see the rest of the world recognizing his abject insanity.

    --
    You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
    1. Re:lol pwned by JimXugle · · Score: 1, Funny

      More like "BOOM! HEADSHOT!"

      I'm gonna go play my extremely violent tetris now, k?

      --
      -jX

      Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
    2. Re:lol pwned by Fiztaru · · Score: 1

      Or, at the very least, someone in a position of authority recognizing it. This (for once, someone who deserves the title) most honorable judge should be the one hearing all the asinine cases where robbers sue the homeowner who actually defended themselves when their house was broken into, or people who sue fast-food companies because their food is 'addictive'. (To be fair, I'm sure that not all the plaintiffs are the ones who initiate the suit in the first place; the attorneys are most likely the ones hauling some of them into court promising a huge settlement check.) At least, he would be hearing the cases long enough to realize how much of a waste of our courts' time they are, then throwing these bottom-feeders out of the courthouse.

      --
      In good speaking, should not the mind of the speaker know the truth of the matter about which he is to speak? - Plato
  2. Ahem by MrSquirrel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let me be the first to say... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... It's about time judges started giving Jack Thompson the respect he deserves.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    1. Re:Ahem by himurabattousai · · Score: 1

      Now all I can think of is "At least TV respects me...." * click * "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"

      --
      "osake no hou ga, biiru yori ii" to omotteiru.
    2. Re:Ahem by tgd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They dropped pants and gave him a Cleveland Steamer?

      Oh, you just mean they said no to his motion?

      Oh well. One could have hoped...

    3. Re:Ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the Cleveland Steamer (administered by Roy Burrell), Jack and Roy decided to play a game of Monroe Transfer with a hamster.

      One can only hope that they both rupture their colons.

  3. Dear Mr. Thompson by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Funny

    "We already have enough of your 'free bird cage liner and toilet paper' for the rest of the month. Please wait until next month before delivering anymore.' Respectfully, LA district court

  4. One-Page Judgment? by dmatos · · Score: 3, Informative

    More like one-sentence judgment. Wow:

    "IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file an amicus curie brief be and is hereby DENIED."

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
    1. Re:One-Page Judgment? by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

      It's not as powerful as it may seem. Legal briefs/motions/proceedings are often worded that way. Standard legalese, in other words.

  5. Jack gives lawyers a bad name by tbannist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, he tried to list himself as co-defendent and co-counsel on the amicus brief. I can't think of any rational reason to list yourself as either when you're neither. It makes me suspect he was trying to create evidence that he could later use to show that he had been personally sued by the video game industry, and then complain about how they hound him relentlessly for his pursuit of American Justice. Of course, the co-counsel part is obviously there to pad his resume.

    --
    Fanatically anti-fanatical
    1. Re:Jack gives lawyers a bad name by Burlap · · Score: 3, Funny

      i suspect, that if his motion had been granted and they lost that somehow or another, JT would not have ended up being a co-payer of any settlemnt.

    2. Re:Jack gives lawyers a bad name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JT has really bad financial advisors.

      Deep down, I still doubt that story but the guy's weird enough to make it seem legit.
      The scary thing is, you just don't know with this guy.

    3. Re:Jack gives lawyers a bad name by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No, lawyers give lawyers a bad name.

      And yet, even a great many lawyers think Thompson is a dillhole.

      You don't get much worse than that.

  6. Jack Thompson is not our friend by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those of us (like me) who aren't lawyers, an Amicus curae is a "friend of the court". In other words, he testifies to the court about what he knows about an issue. Apparently the courts have decided that he doesn't know Jack.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
    1. Re:Jack Thompson is not our friend by nuzak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Apparently the courts have decided that he doesn't know Jack.

      Doesn't seem to know Jack about law either. He signed the brief as a, get this, Defendant, and Co-Counsel. So either he's too incompetent to practice law, or he fraudulently misrepresents himself on legal briefs. But his practice is in Florida, where it seems it's virtually impossible to get disbarred.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    2. Re:Jack Thompson is not our friend by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Poor Jack. No friends. Maybe that's why he's so grouchy.

  7. Didn't know the Judge was a fragger... by B11 · · Score: 1

    The Judge ganked his ass with a HS! About time someone pwned him. What a lamer, Thompson, T4UTD.

    --
    insert inflammatory anti-microsoft comment here
    1. Re:Didn't know the Judge was a fragger... by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Judge to jack: learn 2 play

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Didn't know the Judge was a fragger... by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      Prosecutor to Jack: lol, j00 pwn3d, n00b!

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
  8. one page? by Elminst · · Score: 1

    Barely even one page... Jack got owned in one sentenced.
    GG judge!

    --
    No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  9. IANAL.. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    To any lawyers on here...what's the appropriate impressive-sounding legal Latin term for "FUCK yeah?"

    1. Re:IANAL.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fuckus yeahus?

    2. Re:IANAL.. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Ita Fornicus sounds about right...;)

    3. Re:IANAL.. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 3, Informative

      But it's not, because fornic- isn't the root to a second-declension(-us, -i nouns), it's fornix, fornicis meaning an arch(which is where the prostitutes hung out). Would be more like Fornicatione Ita!(you can reverse, word order doesn't matter here) pronounced four-nick-aht-ee-own-ay ee-tah.(The important part is that the e isn't silent)

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:IANAL.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Know what the best part of this comment is? There are still teachers who wonder why nobody wants to study Latin now that it's no longer mandatory everywhere.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:IANAL.. by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Good! Now write it out one hundred times. And if it's not done by sunrise, I'll cut your balls off!.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    6. Re:IANAL.. by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      I'd kind of like the past participle, "ita fornicatus", since that would also simultaneously convey the sense of "haha PWNED!!!!11"

    7. Re:IANAL.. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      The adverb, "Ita fornicate", would be better. And actually "fornicanter ita", "fuckingly so" would be closest to the real definition.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    8. Re:IANAL.. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      But it's not, because fornic- isn't the root to a second-declension(-us, -i nouns), it's fornix, fornicis meaning an arch(which is where the prostitutes hung out). Would be more like Fornicatione Ita!(you can reverse, word order doesn't matter here) pronounced four-nick-aht-ee-own-ay ee-tah.(The important part is that the e isn't silent)

      What's Latin for "Christ almighty, it was a f*cking joke" ?

    9. Re:IANAL.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good! Now write it out one hundred times. And if it's not done by sunrise, I'll cut your balls off!.


      GP is a girl.
    10. Re:IANAL.. by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > What's Latin for "Christ almighty, it was a f*cking joke" ?

      Please don't get him started on that.

      But c'mon, I'll be damned if "fornicatione ita" doesn't sound damned cool in an Italian accent. I'll have to go up to North Beach and start shouting that... If I make it back in one piece, I'll let you know how it went.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  10. Why is Jack even wasting LA state resources by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in case he didn't notice, violent video games really aren't Louisiana's #1 priority right now....

    1. Re:Why is Jack even wasting LA state resources by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Since when did the Legislature of the State of Louisiana ever have a sense of priority? Or for that matter, any legislature?

    2. Re:Why is Jack even wasting LA state resources by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Hell, why does the US legislature think the high priorities with 2 wars and the shit in Isreal are flag burning ammendments, gay marriage, and "under god" in the pledge?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  11. "I can't think of any rational reason" by Ahnteis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I can't think of any rational reason"

    And yet, he did it. That pretty much sums up Mr. Thompson.

  12. The Tale of Old Jackie by BluePariah · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have been following the Jack Thompson effect for sometime now and I have tried wrap my head around why exactly he has chosen roam around the country like a snake-oil peddler. It's easy to assume he does it for the money, but in many of these cases he's not the being paid. He tries to files these friend-of-the-court motions and calls himself an expert in a field that doesn't exist (often citing his television appearances as somehow legitimate proof of his expertise).

    Old Jackie is dumb and insane. He is a hateful little wretch of a man doing everything he can to reconcile his crumbling world view. This is not a matter of republican or democrat, liberal or conservative. Jackie is a whore and a junkie of the first order and he'll side with anyone who will get him a taste. He comes up with dubious data from studies conducted by his cronies that supposedly expose the dangerous and seedy underbelly of the vicious peddlers in the video game market. Yet his attacks are vapor all over and he knows it. There is an old saying amongst the legal crowd:

    If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If the facts are not on your side, pound the table

    This is how Old Jackie rolls. It will bite him in the end, though, when people remember more about his woefully disillusioned ramblings then they do about his countless attempts to ban video games state by state. He has only been allowed to get this far because gamers are a notoriously lazy bunch, but that will only last so long. Eventually, as they say in the gamer crowd, Old Jackie will get omgwtfpwned and go crawling back to whatever rat-infested Florida swamp that he came out of.

    1. Re:The Tale of Old Jackie by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If the facts are not on your side, pound the table

      The sooner you realize that this is how the majority of people on this ol' mudball operate, the sooner you can expect life to get a little easier.

      Most people cling to their illusions like they're the only thing keeping them from drowning, because it's easier than thinking, and most people don't seem to want to that. I can only assume that they've had it knocked out of them by the experience of public school.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The Tale of Old Jackie by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      After reading his bio on Wikipedia, I can't understand why those rappers didn't just pop a cap in his ass. Maybe the West needs a version of the "suicide bomber" who risks hard jail time by wasting some piece of shit like Thompson.

    3. Re:The Tale of Old Jackie by Perseid · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered why he does this too. I've come up with a few possibilities:

      His college roommates wouldn't let him play pong with them
      His mother was raped by a madman wielding a thrustmaster
      If he can't pass Super Mario, no one else can either

      Perhaps the world will never know why the man is crazy...

    4. Re:The Tale of Old Jackie by FSWKU · · Score: 1
      Maybe the West needs a version of the "suicide bomber" who risks hard jail time by wasting some piece of shit like Thompson.
      Unfortunately, that would just make him (and I hate to use this term when referencing him) a martyr. He speaks out against things people enjoy, and if someone were to "take care of him", so to speak, then his nonsensical ramblings would end up carrying more weight. More people would hear about him because of it, and they would get the idea in their head that he was right because someone brought violence upon him for what he was saying.

      No, the best course of action is for more judges throw his garbage out of the courtroom, and for the rest of the world to simply ignore him. Jack Thompson is nothing but a troll, and to quote a few wise words, "Trolls are energy creatures. Stop feeding them, and they will die."
      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  13. Did anyone else... by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did anyone else hear the UT 2k4 announcer's voice when they read "DENIED"? I wonder if amicus curiae is latin for Redeemer Missile...

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:Did anyone else... by kalirion · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but I heard the voice of that judge from the Simpsons.

    2. Re:Did anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it was james earl jones!!

    3. Re:Did anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Did anyone else hear the UT 2k4 announcer's voice when they read "DENIED"?

      nope. q3a.

    4. Re:Did anyone else... by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      The one that's Malcom's mom, or the other one from older series' like when Sideshow Bob is being released?

    5. Re:Did anyone else... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Older series, he's a guy (Judge Snyder I believe). This is from the episode "Bart - The Murderer." When during Bart's trial Skinner comes into the court room and tells his story of how he was accidentally trapped in the garage (and that Bart didn't kill him), the D.A. requests that the testimony be struck from record. The judge responds with a vehement "DENIED!!!" I only remember this because at my previous job it was one of my co-worker's favorite Simpsons lines to quote.

  14. Why is he still a lawyer? by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But his practice is in Florida, where it seems it's virtually impossible to get disbarred.

    Agreed. Although IANAL, given what I have seen of his communications which get posted online from time to time I can't believe that there hasn't been enough evidence yet to get him disbarred. Whenever his logic is torn asunder by an opponent he is quick to revert to little more than "OMG STFU or I'll sue you!" He relies on his position as a lawyer to bully or intimidate others into either agreeing with him or keeping quiet. If nothing else don't state bar associations have rules regarding general conduct under which they could remove his right to practice?

    I also wonder about his motivations. His stance against video games verges on psychotic at times. What happened Jack? Were you molested by an Atari as a child? Never got that ColecoVision you so desperately wanted for Christmas and so are taking your vengence out on all the other kids? Or is he planning on running for senator under the "I saved every child in the world from the video game horror" banner? It's like he lives and breathes destroying an entire industry, he won't be happy until we're playing pong with anti-alias blurred paddle graphics because the original versions too closely resemble a phallus. :P

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by FinchWorld · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Why is he still a lawyer"

      Well, considering how many lawyers there are around I can only assume shooting them must be illegal:/

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    2. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by RsG · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, considering how many lawyers there are around I can only assume shooting them must be illegal:/
      Ah crap! Why didn't anyone tell me this earlier?
      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    3. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's okay. I think it's just a $50 fine if you do. You should be able to mail it in.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Well, considering how many lawyers there are around I can only assume shooting them must be illegal :/

      > Ah crap! Why didn't anyone tell me this earlier?

      It's remarkably difficult to get good legal advice from a lawyer after shooting them :-)

    5. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not just that shooting lawyers is illegal, it's that it doesn't work! Damn lawyers must be playing in God mode or something...

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    6. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by LordWill · · Score: 1

      It is illegal, but beyond that its a bad idea, as doing so tends to attract many more lawyers.

    7. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wow... Now that's what I call incentive to quit smoking. I can drill 2 lawyers/month for that price!

    8. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      Actually, I find that I prefer listening to what comes out their mouths AFTER shooting them ;)

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    9. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see if we can think of a reason that nobody around you was familiar enough with the law to tell you that shooting lawyers was illegal.

    10. Re:Why is he still a lawyer? by Garnaralf · · Score: 1

      Read his Wiki entry.

      They tried to disbar him once, and he sued them for megabucks. They setled for 20k.

      He is currently under investigation, but he filed another suit against the Florida Bar, in federal court. Although IIR, he dropped it in order to pursue a state one.

      He's a fucking asshole out to make a buck and become famous off of other people's misery.

  15. Ashamed... by fferret · · Score: 1

    ...that my last name is the same as his. Between him and former senator Fred "Law & Order" Thompson, I may have to change it to something less controversial...like "Hussein" or "Qaddafi".

    --
    We're through being cool! Eliminate the ninnies and the twits! -Devo
    1. Re:Ashamed... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Don't think of Jack, think of Hunter S..

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:Ashamed... by fferret · · Score: 1

      Actually, I managed to see Hunter live once. He was doing commentary on the 1972 presidential election from a club in NYC. He was incoherent, raving...in other words everything you'd expect!

      --
      We're through being cool! Eliminate the ninnies and the twits! -Devo
  16. I Call Shenanigans! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

    Doesn't he have the 1st amendment right to say anything he wants ... including those stupid things that will only make us laugh at him and hate him more?

    1. Re:I Call Shenanigans! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. The court just realizes that anything he's likely to say is going to be largely irrelevant and/or content-free, and doesn't intend to let him shoot his mouth off in thier courtroom.

    2. Re:I Call Shenanigans! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1
      anything he's likely to say is going to be largely irrelevant and/or content-free
      Would that make it a TV commercial, a politician's public apology or any news on the Hollywood Access Extra Inside Entertainment Report?
    3. Re:I Call Shenanigans! by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Doesn't he have the 1st amendment right to say anything he wants

      Neither libel, fraud, nor vexatious litigation are protected by the first amendment. Thompson's existence revolves around all three.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    4. Re:I Call Shenanigans! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      I was being sarcastic. Personally, I think Thompson would wipe his ass with all the amendments if he thought it would get him some free publicity.

    5. Re:I Call Shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, he can say what he wants. But he doesn't get to insert himself into a legal proceedings.

  17. And I betI know what his reaction will be by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I haven't read the article or read any comment from Jack yet, but I'll bet I can guess his spin on this will be something along the lines of "The Games industry his clearly absolutely terrified of me. This is why they went to so much effort to have me barred from this case. This is proof that I'm winning."

    Anyone want to take me up on this bet?

    1. Re:And I betI know what his reaction will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment makes me think of Jack Thompson as Wimp Lo:

      Wimp Lo: Ha! My face to your foot style, how do you like it?
      Chosen One: I'm sure on some planet your style is impressive, but your weak link is: this is Earth.
      Wimp Lo: Oh yeah? Then try my nuts to your fist style!

            (After the fight)

      Wimp Lo: I'm bleeding, making me the victor!

    2. Re:And I betI know what his reaction will be by Binsky · · Score: 0

      Alright, I'm confused now... I've just read the amicus from game politics and there Jack thompson is referred to as John Thompson... Is there something I've missed in English class? http://www.gamepolitics.com/images/JT-amicus-louis iana.doc In any case, I was overjoyed to hear about this ruling, it seems more people are waking up to his sillyness, and refuse to take him seriously.

    3. Re:And I betI know what his reaction will be by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Is there something I've missed in English class?

      Jack is a common nickname for John.

    4. Re:And I betI know what his reaction will be by Binsky · · Score: 0

      Ah, thanks! Like the English sometimes call people named Richard, Dick? Sorry for the offtopicness, I could not google for that ;) (or at least couldn't find the answer)

    5. Re:And I betI know what his reaction will be by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Like the English sometimes call people named Richard, Dick?

      And Charles <---> Chuck.

      You got it. :)

  18. Publicity by phorm · · Score: 1

    It's easy to assume he does it for the money, but in many of these cases he's not the being paid

    And yet most of us know who he is. Assumedly, if somebody wanted to go sue "BloodyExposiveGames.com" they might pick up on his name from the media and pay him to be their lawyer.

  19. More to the point... by patio11 · · Score: 1

    ... why did no one tell Dick Cheney?

  20. Heh. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    If the facts are on your side, pound the facts.
    If the facts are not on your side, pound the table


    And if the table is not on your side, pound sand

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  21. His Brief by FubarDac · · Score: 1

    How can he claim to be an expert on video games when he doesn't even get the medium that the game he is discussing comes on. Someone should tell him, well not tell him because its funnier this way, that GTA:VC comes on DVD's not CD's but that's okay, i'm surprised that he even knows that they come on a medium. Also he clames that he has expertise about video games because he predicted on TV that Colimbine would happen...I thought he was a lawyer. If that was actually ever used as justification in court he'd be laughed out of the court room. I could just see the scenerio now. Laywer:" So tell us your expertise" Thomsons Testifying : "I predicted the future of how in my opinion it was a video game that caused people to kill other people" Lawyer:"Your Honor at this time I'd like to qualify the witness as an expert" Judge: "Get he the heck out of my courtroom, both of you! I have a mind to hold you in contempt for waste mine and the people's time"

  22. Can he be stopped by clvrmonkey · · Score: 1

    Is there a way to launch a general challenge against someone who rampages around claiming expert witness status? In other words, could someone sue him, unrelated to any specific case, to stop him from claiming he is an expert witness?

    --
    All God does is watch us and kill us when we get boring. We must never, ever be boring.
    1. Re:Can he be stopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he has the right to act foolish and abrasive.

      The game industry has the right to produce creative works.

      Free people have the right to buy them and play them just as they do novels and movies.

      Self-regulation via a rating system in the movie and game industry was developed for one purpose; to keep the government from imposing its own regulation on creative works in order to protect the public from itself. The idea being that individuals have the presence of mind to decide what is and is not reasonable for themselves and their family.

      Likewise, a judge has the freedom (and authority) to completely disregard his request for amicus curiae.

  23. Old Man Withers by nastro · · Score: 1

    It's pretty easy for me to imagine Jack as the Old Man Withers to the Scooby-Doo gang of gamers.

    Damned meddling kids.