Slashdot Mirror


Google Doubles its Profits

WinEveryGame writes "Google just announced a very strong quarter. The internet search engine said it had net income of $721m, or $2.33 per diluted share, up from $343m a year earlier. Wall Street had expected earnings of $1.94 per share. Earlier this week Yahoo had announced lower than expected earnings."

15 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. The value of engineers by ph1ll · · Score: 4, Insightful
    <irony>Google? Are they still around? I thought The Economist had predicted their demise ages ago</irony>

    Seriously, it's nice to see a company that values its engineers doing so well.

    --
    --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
  2. Google's Bad Business Model by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And all this money comes from adwords? Does it bother anyone besides me that google has only one source of revenue? It's like a company that sells only one product ... if demand for their product decreases the company dies. For example consider this possible situation: Microsoft bundles an adblocker with IE, automatically turned on, that blocks, among other things, google's adwords. Even if google sues MS could keep it in court long enough for google to go under. Scary isn't it?

    1. Re:Google's Bad Business Model by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Currently, Adwords is the MAJOR source of revenue (they sell a few search appliances, but that's pennies compared to Adwords), but Google Checkout will hopefully be a decent income source, especially once Google Base becomes more popular.

    2. Re:Google's Bad Business Model by AIX-Hood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a big difference between something that requires user intervention to get going, and something which blocks all ads when you install the main browser.

    3. Re:Google's Bad Business Model by khendron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't this like say TV networks and radio stations have a bad business model, because all they sell are commercials?

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    4. Re:Google's Bad Business Model by instantkamera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " Does it bother anyone besides me that google has only one source of revenue? It's like a company that sells only one product..."

      1) no. it doesnt because no, thye dont. What about the new google payment system? What about the google-store.com that was mentioned already (not that i think that is a huge revenue turner)? That is not to mention all the free shit they give away that they could charge for. There's gold in them there hills.

      2) Even if it was, tons of companies only sell one product. As long as they keep the buyers of said product buying ...

  3. Is it? by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it the value of the engineers?
    or is the value of a natural monopoly in a truely open market as opposed to a tied monopoly in closed market such as the MS's?
    Do not get me wrong. Google's engineering is what got them to this size. After all, Alta Vista, Yahoo and MS held 95% of the market when Google started. It is Googles superior ideas that enabled them to beat these other companies.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Is it? by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I switched in the early days for a number of reasons:
      1. The search is the most applicabale that that I seen. Yahoo was better when they were young , but did not scale.
      2. AV, Yahoo, and MSN had the entire first page as paid ads (even though it looked like they were real).
      3. Several simple text ads vs. the huge number of ads that AV/Yahoo/MSN ran.
      4. Simple page means it loads fast. Real Fast.
      5. They pushed the distributed tech.

      Call it cool if you like. They were simply one of the most advanced tech firms going and getting better.
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  4. Yahoo = adserver and other problems by sjwest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had a yahoo webmail account, the new webmail beta needs new windows or mac, since i have neither webmail beta is a no go. Explain to me why webmail needs windows or mac binaries - spyware ?

    Geocities trashed my webspace too after a couple of years no explaination about that either

    What can we learn from yahoo ?

    • Im not going to spend much time here 'exploring'
    • I'm not going to use, or buy webmail plus
    • If yahoo think i visit yahoo just for there webadverts (screen coverage is increasing) then think again.
    • 360 - blog platform is um full of privacy issues for me, and too late
    • ? The 'portal' died ?
  5. Re:Value for money by Threni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > $2.33 earnings per share, at a cost of $387 per share. That's a return of 0.6% per year on your
    > investment so at this rate it will take about 166 years to get your investment back in earned
    > value.

    Er..you own the share too, so you'd have $389.33. Then there's dividends - many people own shares in companies that have negligable growth for years, purely because the dividends return more money than they'd get as interest from a bank.

  6. 721 Million dollars? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish I could come up with that kind of "bad business model"

    Seriously though your "possible situation" is 100% laughable. If MS released such a browser it would take a long time to seriously penetrate the market and there would be strong resistance not just from Google. If the browser won't show ads then 99% of sites out there would refuse to serve it content.

    Google will certainly face challenges but to suggest that adwords revenue will simply disappear is absurd.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  7. Another thing by thealsir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is news about google stock on the site? Since search was down, I didn't get to see if slashdot posted news about Yahoo's stock dropping 22% in a day, the largest single drop ever, on Wed. Either make a customized finance.slashdot.org (which I'm sure a lot of slashdotters would be quite happy about, focusing on the financial aspects of certain tech companies and F/OSS finances) or don't report news at all.

    But please, none of this "Logo Toilet Paper to replace Charmin at the Googleplex" news. I find slashdot diverging from its focus when it reports minutia about google. Either report all minutia, or report none, and especially don't bias toward certain companies (Yahoo, an equally important company, isn't nearly as well followed?)

    --
    Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
  8. Holding breath., by rzekson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm holding my breath waiting until Google, the holy virgin and the axis of all goodness, donates a fraction of their profit comparable to that contributed by the much hated Microsoft.

  9. Re:I wonder... by Elemenope · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to be a Microsoft-Bash party pooper, but MS has made a few things that 'work', and even work well (as you mentioned, BASIC). The two that come most immediately to mind in the present world are MS Word and MS Excel. I personally use Open Office, not because it is better (because it isn't), but because I am poor. For those who can afford it, these programs are worth the investment. Though, I will admit this does not make up for the crap we have had to put up with from their OS department.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  10. Re:Amazing by ibjhb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do keep in mind, especially with financial transactions, there are different laws in different countries and they may not be able to quickly release a certain product in your country.