Microsoft's 12-Step Program
NevarMore writes to tell us eWeek is reporting that Microsoft, after almost 30 years of Windows, now has 12 philosophical tenets outlining Windows development. From the article: "Smith said the principles largely come from things Microsoft picked up in the consent decree the software giant signed in settling its landmark antitrust battle with the federal government, but that more recent developments led to the crafting of some of the other principles. The 12 principles are based on three main areas: choice for computer manufacturers and customers, opportunities for developers, and interoperability for users, Smith said."
So does that make 36 tenets in total?0 7/20/2047250 7 218&tid=109
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/19/21
"I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
I believe it is Microsoft that is nearing 30 years
Their 30th anniversary was last year. Microsoft was founded in April 1975.
Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
Smith said the principles largely come from things Microsoft picked up in the consent decree the software giant signed in settling its landmark antitrust battle with the federal government, but that more recent developments led to the crafting of some of the other principles.
Am I the only person who saw this?
Translation: We had to make some changes to keep from getting hit by more massive lawsuits, and then thanks to the EU ruling we had to make yet more changes. But we're going to act like it was voluntary because it looks better.
Where in there is "we've figured out some things that customers want and we're going to provide them"? No, this is all "let's keep from being sued again".
Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
And we can get past all that antitrust litigation.
Oh, we forgot to mention the entire open source movement and anything they happen to create. Them and Google. Oh, and Apple. Um... how about if we just limit this to companies we can buy or crush?
Again with the antitrust thing. Of course there's nothing saying you won't buy or destroy the other company, retaliation is completely different.
#$%$^ EU.
Wait, didn't we just say no retaliation? Oh, you meant retaliation against them? Ok, them too.
We had this cool system all ready to go, but the marketing dept said they couldn't find a good way to sell it without pissing off the anti-trust folks.
Ok, so just this one time, we are going to do what we were order to do by the courts. But don't push your luck.
We think there's a lot of money to be made here.
Except to those damn open source folks, we'll make sure the license is way to restrictive for them.
We always have. Just ignore the fact that we then extend them to our own liking. And that process usually means we have to break a few parts of the standard.
So, yeah, nothing to see here folks. Move along.
You have a good point. We've seen exactly this sort of attempt with the XML aspects of WinFS, with their modifications of Kerberos, and in their attempt to extend SPF with their SenderID system.
Fortunately, WinFS has finally been cancelled, Kerberos has been extended by MIT's authors to work around Microsoft's mistaken "extension", and fortunately or unfortunately SPF has basically been rejected due to the licensing problems Microsoft's "exteionsion" created.