Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

2.5Gb/s Internet For French Homes

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the gentlemen-start-your-envy dept.

Erick Lionheart at www.gamersloot.net writes "Presence-pc at reports that France Telecom just announced they are offering 2.5 Gb/s Internet connections to select cities in the Paris region. For ... $85(70 Euros) a month you also get free phone and TV. From the article (in French): 'The historical operator opted for a GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Network) FTTH architecture (Fiber To The Home). This technology allows up to 2.5 Gbits/s download and 1.2 Gigabits/s upload.'"

7 of 536 comments (clear)

  1. offering 2.5 Gb/s... by kzharv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But I notice they are using GPON. I have 1Gb/s GPON in Japan (free, comes with the body corp fees) and 1Gig aint "1Gig". Yeah looks good but I would prefer dedicated 100Meg than 2.5Gig GPON.

  2. FT by lovebyte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    France Telecom/Orange better improve their current offers. They are eaten alive by other ADSL providers. FT/Orange gives you 18Mb/s ADSL for 40 euros a month (includes TV channels AND NO telephone) when other providers gives you 24Mb/s for 25 to 30 euros which includes TV AND free phone calls to Europe, USA, and other countries. They lose thousands of customers per month.
    Let's hope that they'll compete by innovating, but I doubt it.

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  3. Sigh.... by Nonillion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And here in America, we STILL fall further and further behind in broadband. Where is this 45+ M/bit sync fiber connection the telcos promised 80%+ of Americans were supposed to have by now?

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:Sigh.... by blurryrunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They spent it all here in Utah :)

      http://www.utopianet.org/

      Seriously, we have FTTH here and its great. It probably covers 50 to 75% of the population center for the state. At home its 5Mb up/down with no restrictions on use. We also have it at the office which gives us 30 Mb up/down and its only $130 per month. Yesterday at work, I checked something out from sourceforge and was downloading at peak 5 MBytes per second and averaged about 2.2 MBytes per second. So its starting to come, but you have to live in Utah. :)

      Ok, so I'm gloating a little bit.

      -br

  4. Are webservers allowed? by SeanMon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    because I don't see any other way of saturating a 1.2 Gb/s connection upload, even if your entire street shares it...

    well, I guess Bittorrent might.

    I ask because I setup a Gentoo-based webserver in my house but can't open it to the world because it's against my ISP's Terms of Service.

    --
    "Scud Storm!" -- Jeremy of PurePwnage.com
  5. Re:Define "free"? by kabocox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think some sort of boost is needed, but I'm not sure what. Obviously, the market is providing enough incentive to innovate and expand services.

    Um, no. The phone companies are happy soaking us for what we little bandwidth they'll sell you. I want a $15-20 a month bill that pays for Gigabit speeds up and down. I want to be able to watch IP TV and use IP telephones instead of the piece of crap system that we currently have. We should have not just full video conferencing now, but we should have hi-def video conferencing anywhere in the US by now. Our entire communications infrastructure is a disgrace.

  6. Re:Sweet Mother of Potatoes! by andrewman327 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just don't see most residential homes needing to play online games while working from the corporate server through a VPN while talking on the VOIP phone while streaming YouTube and Google Video at the same time while running your personal website while backing up all of your data. I do agree that businesses would benefit tremendously from cheapening the "tubes."

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.