Slashdot Mirror


House Passes Ban on Social Site Access

Krishna Dagli writes to mention a C|Net story covering a House of Representatives vote on restricting access to social sites on public terminals. The bill, which passed the House in a 410-15 vote, would bar users from accessing sites like Amazon, MySpace, or Slashdot from terminals in libraries and schools. Adults would be able to 'ask permission' to access such sites. From the article: "'Social networking sites, best known by the popular examples of MySpace, Friendster and Facebook, have literally exploded in popularity in just a few short years,' said Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican and one of DOPA's original sponsors. Now, he added, those Web sites 'have become a haven for online sexual predators who have made these corners of the Web their own virtual hunting ground.'"

11 of 681 comments (clear)

  1. Literally exploded? by dido · · Score: 5, Funny

    Strange I didn't hear a thing...

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    1. Re:Literally exploded? by escher · · Score: 4, Funny

      You see, the internet is a series of tubes. When you have enough fragments of social sites moving around, they clog up those tubes, preventing the porn images from coming through.

      They're only trying to save the internet for porn!

    2. Re:Literally exploded? by BalanceOfJudgement · · Score: 4, Funny

      My name is Inyego Montoya. You killed my language. Prepare to die!

      --

      We are the fire that lights our world.. and we are the fire that consumes it.
  2. Slashdot?? by HugePedlar · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...would bar users from accessing sites like Amazon, MySpace, or Slashdot.....[which] ....have become a haven for online sexual predators who have made these corners of the Web their own virtual hunting ground."

    Of course, because preteen girls are well known for associating themselves with this particular social network.

    --
    Argh.
    1. Re:Slashdot?? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny
      preteen girls are well known for associating themselves with this particular social network.

      It must be all the ponies.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Just for a second my heart sang by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny
    From TFA
    the popular examples of MySpace, Friendster and Facebook, have literally exploded
    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. Re:What a nice group to be in... by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    If slashdot is grouped with MySpace does that mean we are also a haven for online sexual predators?

    As many times as goatse has been posted around here, I'd say yes.

  5. Re:Evil by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously this law just screams out to be abused. Who defines when a site is social? Does the Democratic party have a forum? I bet that makes them social enough to be blocked. On the other hand though they are blocking MySpace, so this law does have some redeeming qualities.

    Forgive me Congress, for I have sinned. I have had impure thoughts that you lot are trying to control the minds of the people. I was greatly disturbed to see the margin of passage as 410-15. But I see I was wrong now. Clearly the people cannot be allowed to think for themselves and anything they wish to do may be construed as a possible connection to the sinister. I beseech thee to absolve me of my moment of falling from grace.

    does the offering basket take PayPal?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  6. Help? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

    My own sites tend to have text boxes for reader comments and guestbooks and things, does this make them havens for sexual predators? Because it'd be terribly unfair if underage kids could somehow get a date through my web presence while I still can't.

  7. This Story... by eno2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is an outright lie. Because it claims that the bill was primarily backed and created by Republicans. And Republicans are for LESS government, not more dammit!!!

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  8. David Cross said it best ... by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Dude, it was so funny I literally shit my pants!"

    "Well, what did you do?"

    "What do you mean, dude? I was laughing..."

    "I mean, what did you do with your shitty pants?"

    "No, dude, I didn't REALLY shit my pants, I LITERALLY shit my pants!"

    Cheers,
    Ari

    --

    Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.