OSS on Windows the Next Big Thing?
Lam1969 writes "Linux geeks and Microsoft have similar interests, says Computerworld: They both are interested in seeing open-source software succeed. Linux geeks admit that the open source OS isn't necessarily a better platform for important applications, and Microsoft recognizes that many of its customers are using open-source applications, and doesn't want to alienate them." From the article: "Faced with the allure of inexpensive open-source applications among its core customer base of small to midsize businesses, Microsoft has toned down its rhetoric. 'It's a myth that open-source and Windows can't work together. Customers just aren't religious about these things,' said Ryan Gavin, a director of platform strategy for Microsoft."
I actually believe that's one of the tenets of the Open Source Definition.
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
*** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
I agree - I believe 9 and 10 are most relevent. As with the prior posts regarding the projects asking "Please do not port to Windows" - in a sense they are undermining the spirit of OSS.
/. readers would be all over it about how Windows/Microsoft is trying to edge out Linux and OSS as it was not true OSS.
If someone wrote an OSS app for Windows and stated "Please do not port to Linux",
Dear Sir or Madam,
I would humbly like to bring to your attention the fact that in most English dialects of which I am aware, proper nouns such as "English" or "German" are capitalized. I do hope you do not take offense, as I am merely attempting to inform you of something of which you may not be aware.
Sincerely yours,
-DeviantQ-
"May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
It's a bunch of crap anyway. They act like the P-languages are the only options, when all along people have been developing dynamic web content using everything from bourne shell to objective C.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"