Slashdot Mirror


Linus Speaks Out On GPLv3

Slagged writes to mention the word that Linus Torvalds isn't a fan of the new GPL draft. News.com has the story, and someone purporting to be Linus is causing a ruckus in the Groklaw thread on the subject. From the News.com article: "Say I'm a hardware manufacturer. I decide I love some particular piece of open-source software, but when I sell my hardware, I want to make sure it runs only one particular version of that software, because that's what I've validated. So I make my hardware check the cryptographic signature of the binary before I run it ... The GPLv3 doesn't seem to allow that, and in fact, most of the GPLv3 changes seem to be explicitly designed exactly to not allow the above kind of use, which I don't think it has any business doing."

1 of 615 comments (clear)

  1. Re:not surprising by phantomfive · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I don't know what you mean by 'software ideology.' Linus says he likes to have the source code to his software. RMS also likes to have the source code to his software. All the stuff RMS has done is for one purpose only, to ensure that we will have source code to modify in the future. It is a very practical goal. The GPL is a good licence because it was made to be practical, not out of some mythical ideology.

    --
    Qxe4