Slashdot Mirror
Cyberwar on NASA Websites
Vexorian writes "Two NASA websites were hacked today by a group of Chilean activist hackers. The reason was to protest against the war on Lebanon. The mirror of the defaced site contains an image of an injured child and claims that the sites were running MacOSX."
You want to protest the war, fine -- but don't exepct me to care what you have to say when you can't make your voice heard in a public and legal forum.
just curious, what public and legal forums do anti-war activists in chile have at their disposal to have their message heard (in america)?
for that matter, what forum does *anyone* have in america to have their voices heard -- we're an ADD society...
mr c
"Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it." - R. Feynman
Hezbullah kidnaps and kills Israelis on their own territory. Israelis try to get them back. Hezbullah fires 100's of rockets into Israel to terrorise the civilian population. Israel wages war to exterminate Hezbullah. Chilean hacker defaces NASA website. Am I missing something?
an ill wind that blows no good
See, the first website you should be hacking is Hizbullah. They are the terrorist fuckers whose little cross-border kidnapping raid led to the deaths of hundreds of their fellow Lebanese.
Second, you should be hacking Ehud Olmert's site -- the first non-military Israeli prime minister in ages, who decides to prove his miltary virility by bombing Lebanese children.
Then, the IDF, the Knesset, the Mossad.
Then, the Arab League, for being pussies and not helping Lebanon.
Then, the White House and US Congress, for not pressuring Israel to stop. Maybe the Pentagon if you are so inclined
Then, don't forget to hack your own government's site, for not sending humanitarian aid to Lebanese refugees.
And you do NOT hack NASA, not unless a space shuttle fuel tank falls on Beirut.
Troll !
Typical....
Can anyone who actually reads my comment explain to me how my comment possibly gets categorised like this ? Is it just because I'm not toeing the slashdot pro USA, pro republican line?
I think Slashdot is rapidly becoming a redundant as a source of real objective information. Most of the articles on it are just regurgitations of things previously published on Digg, the moderation and karma system is just a huge wank.