Slashdot Mirror


NASA May Shut Down all Space Station's Research

jdoire writes "NASA is considering shutting down all the research programs it conducts aboard the international space station for at least a year to fill a projected budget shortfall of up to $100 million, a top station manager said on Thursday. Why the shortfall, you may ask? Because of $3 billion of Congress's pet projets"

11 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. construction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they're going to finish building the damn thing in less than 4 years, why doesn't it make sense to stop playing with that science experiment and put on their hard hat? They need to focus on construction or else you'll have this half finished barge in orbit. You'll get a lot more science done when the place is big enough for a 6 scientists.

    1. Re:construction by DrLang21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However, this isn't allowing them to focus on construction anymore than they used to. The rerouted funds are simply coming out of the research and adding nothing to the construction project. This seems to be typical of Congressional thought processes. If only there was a feasible way to get the private sector to dumb as much money into space flight as the government used to, we could get so much more done.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  2. China by astralbat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see China overtaking the US in space exploration within the next decade or so because of all the beurocratic nonesense and hoop jumping going on in West

    1. Re:China by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "In fact, they wouldn't have half their navigation tech"

      So where'd the other half come from?

      The same could be said about the early American and Soviet space programs - they really needed the experience the Germans had. Or are you going to argue that the scientists and engineers from Peenemunde were not important?

    2. Re:China by gumpish · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Time to stop wasting money on the space station and put NASA's budget doing what it does best.
      Which is what? (According to you...)
  3. Good, Play Hardball by GreggBz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've not yet deiced if Michel Griffin is doing a better job, or if I just paid less attention when Sean O'Keefe, the previous administrator fought such battles.

    I think Michael Griffin is doing a better job.
    Focus on the missions, and the supplementary benefits will follow. NASA did not need to buy computers for students, build planetariums or make a special website so that I could learn about the Voyager missions. Instead, they supremely engineered those things, and the science that they returned (and are still returning) inspired and taught the world.

    People tend to underestimate the impact of one successful mission. Voyager, Hubble, Apollo and The Mars Rovers have done more for
    science and education around the world than any congressman.

  4. Re:"pet" projects, nice troll by jimktrains · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree. When I read the summary I was expecting some stupid government thing, but these seem like worthwhile efforts. I'm at least not upset that the money is going towards those goals and not other things (i.e.: Iraq). It almost seems as if the government is *gasp* acting responsibly.

    The proof of your last sentence: Pigeon Hole Principle (sorry, I had to).

    --
    "You will do foolish things, but do them with enthusiasm." - S. G. Colette
  5. Re:"pet" projects, nice troll by budgenator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice troll is right;

    Construction or renovation of dozens of museums, planetariums and science labs for colleges. Oh I see NASA is uniquely qualified to provide laser light shows to rock music and the presence of museums and planetariums are instrumental to the exploration of aeronaughtics and space.

    Computers, classrooms and lab space for colleges and schools across the U.S. If you've checked the prices on tutition and contact hours recently you'd know that if a school wants something useful, they'd just cut a check and buy it, if a school wants something that's "well yeaah maybe it'll come in handy, I'm sure we'll figure out something to do with it" than why not get the money direct from congress and cut out the middle-man, doesn't the middle-man have better things to do than run community outreach when their primary mission is basicaly on hold?

    A website and laboratory for the Gulf of Maine Aquarium. Fish in space, KEWL I wanta aquarium on ISS! That'll make one hell of a screen saver!

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  6. Rest Assured by Neuropol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    NASA could have been budgeted free and clear for the next ten years if it were not for this stupid war we keep shovelling out the million$ for each week.

    1. Re:Rest Assured by zeux · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No WMDs, we told you so.

      - The French.

  7. Re:"pet" projects, nice troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are they directly related to space exploration and (related) research? If not, why are they coming out of the NASA budget? Surely the "Computers, classrooms and lab space for colleges and schools across the U.S." should come from a different budget? Similar with the Aquarium.

    Theres "worthy choices", and then there are "worthy choices that are funded by the appropriate budget". These may be the former, but apart from the museums and planetariums I think they are not the latter. They sound to me more like there is no way in h*ll that federal money would otherwise be granted to the project, so they got NASA to spend its limited budget on it instead.