Slashdot Mirror
PC-BSD: The Most Beginner Friendly OS
soniyea writes "OSWeekly.com reviews PC-BSD and considers it the most beginner friendly OS in the market. 'From PC-BSD's roadmap to their default installation, I honestly feel good about where these guys are headed with their take on FreeBSD. This operating system has it all: support both from the professional level as well as that of the community, the ability to install Linux software, thanks to the binary compatibility layer, and of course — speed. Understand for most people, the speed factor is more or less a matter of opinion. But I have found that in some areas, it felt faster at the core level. Maybe I just had too much coffee that day? Either way, I totally recommend PC-BSD for anyone wanting to take a step into the wild side. FreeBSD, it's not just for geeks anymore.'"
Ok, stop with the "next" bullshit. This is only the easiest way to install a program because people are trained this way. The easiest way to install a program is to use a package manager -- and no, it doesn't have to be a commandline. It also does help with installing the 3 or 4 different apps, and finding the one that actually works, if you end up having to go through that -- for whatever reason, I don't often have this problem.
Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
How in the world is that flamebait?!
It's the truth.
OSWEEKLY blows a fierce Microsoft wind up readers asses.
They are a mewling new eyeball lamprey.
Their assumed impartiality is that they review operating systems, hopefully without bias.
The article I pointed out is a clarion call to their true charter, and it's worthy of mentioning to others who, like me, browse technical sites and have started seeing OSWEEKLY showing up.
So just to be clear here, any website which outright dismisses the attention and the work and the excellence of so many people that's gone into Linux in favor of Windows IS A WINDOWS FLUFFER/TURFING SITE.
Are we supposed to forgive them for wanting to accept the bread and wine of Microsoft?
HELL NO. And I wouldn't be browsing slashdot if I had to look at it dripping with Microsoft ads.
Can we empathise with them for wanting to kick the Strawman Penguin and make fierce in order to impress Microsoft?
NO. Because they're clearly not interested in being a technical site for the long-term, I think they're in it for the money.
They're punking their own creditbility. Sucks to the turfmasters and sucks to Microsoft for enabling them.
Once upon a time I would have been forgiving...back in 1997 or something, however, this far along in the game synergistic hand-job crap is contemptible.
Kids should try having a real job before they act like they're authorities and save their bullshitting for when they're walking around in parking lots asking people if they know Jesus loves them.
Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento