Slashdot Mirror


Some Bands Still Refuse Music Downloads

Zelbinian writes "Wired News reports there are a number of artists, ranging from The Beatles to Radiohead, that are still holding out on iTunes. Some feel that per-track downloads hurt the artistic integrity of albums as a whole; for others it's simply a matter of negotiation troubles. From the article: 'Since record companies have realized the popularity of iTunes and other sites, many reworked contracts to give artists less money per download. Andrews said while record companies once offered artists about 30 cents for each song sold, now musicians are earning less than a dime.'"

3 of 545 comments (clear)

  1. Of Course! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny
    'Since record companies have realized the popularity of iTunes and other sites, many reworked contracts to give artists less money per download. Andrews said while record companies once offered artists about 30 cents for each song sold, now musicians are earning less than a dime.'
    Well, obviously when the record companies underestimated demand they also underestimated the rates of breakage and returns, so of course they would have to modify the artists' cut in order to better compensate the record companies for those costs.
    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  2. You should get it by XanC · · Score: 5, Funny
    BTW Taco, I want a raise.

    You deserve one; you post here all the time!

  3. Re:Ohh the irony by Draconix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple won.

    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.