Slashdot Mirror
New Hope for Stem Cell Research
ExE122 writes "A new scientific breakthrough allows scientists to harvest stem cells without harming the embryo. From the article: ''We have shown that we can not only generate stem cells without destroying the embryo, but that the remaining embryo also has the potential to go to on create a healthy blastocyst' said Dr Lanza, whose team's research is published in Nature. Asked if he expected the advance to satisfy President Bush, Dr Lanza said: 'Well, as you know, the President objects to the fact that you would be sacrificing one life to save another, and in this instance there is no harm to the embryo.''"
[When an individual kills a person, he is called a murderer. When an individual kills, maims or tortures over one hundred thousand people, he is called George W. Bush.]
where's the Left Wing Say-anything-to-get-me-elected-zealot?
Up there on the stage... Right next to the New-Aged-Right Wing Say-anything-to-get-me-elected-zealot.
> This is similar enough to cloning to trigger the same hostility. I don't really see the difference
> it will make.
Pro-life people are driven by dogma rather than science and logic. It's a close enough call that it's possibly possible to choose which position they'll take by phoning radio shows, posting to net forums, writing to church leaders etc and putting your side of the argument. Once it's been decided upon it'll probably have enough enertia behind it to become hard to change back without a humiliating u-turn. So probably a good idea to push a pro-cloning (with regard to "soul copying/duplicating") argument now!
So, given that some people will succumb to their natural desires at some point, what is the better choice, that people have knowledge and easy access to the tools to help mitigate or avoid the negative consequences or that people have none of those tools?
What good does the re-examination of the guidelines do if no substantive action is taken? Is this one of those "I feel your pain" moments?
Your point is -1 Irrelevant and the original point remains valid.
When you harvest stem cells from an embryo, you are not destroying a “life” in the same way you do not destroy a life when you trim your fingernails. An embryo, at the stage stem cells are collected, is just a small cluster of cells. No nervous system, no heart; the thing is far from human. Can we stop letting religious fundamentalists who do not have an ounce of scientific understanding (or deliberately practice ignorance) on the matter frame the debate? There is nothing magical or spiritual about fertilization and the cells which result. The transfer of genetic material does not mean the ovum is suddenly imbued with a “soul.” You might as well get upset over the deaths of the millions of sperm and monthly wasted ovum that do not result in a zygote.
Join Tor today!
You have to have available birth control because a percentage of young people will gleefully start having sex as soon as their hormones kick into gear...No amount of education will stop this.
Not true at all. If you bother to tell kids the TRUTH about sex (that it has a specific purpose, procreation of the species, and that when done sucessfully it takes about 20 years, give or take 5 or ten for maturity levels of parent and child) then there's no problem with self control of hormones. For those who choose it, you simply marry them to their significant other, and no divorce allowed until the children are adults.
And when I say education, I mean education. I don't mean "teach abstinence". I mean "this is sex, this is what goes on, this is what you can catch, and this is how you can do it safely." I'm talking a significant course here, not just a day out of gym class.
Implying that it can be done "safely" is a lie at best. But the rest I most certainly DO agree with- just be sure to tell the WHOLE truth, not just the recreational half-truth that sex is just intercourse and only takes sleeping together and one night stands.
The only way to help people make the right descision, is to make sure they have access to all the information. They may go through the whole class and not learn a damn thing, but they have a much better chance than if you'd tried to keep them in ignorance all along.
Completely agreed. And when you have laws that back that up; requiring people take parental responsibility, then there's no need for birth control at all.
SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
This story shows that /. readers are too stupid to deserve to live.
The issue with embryonic (totempotent) stem cells is that they cause cancer in the patient receiving the injection...EVERY TIME.
If you can point to one patient who has survived 18 months after receiving an injection of embryonic stem cells, and does not have terminal cancer, I will pay you $100 (US.)
The only reason embryonic stem cells are being pushed is to make abortion look like the cure for cancer or diabetes. (I'm a Type I diabetic.) I have giveun up home of a cure for diabetes in my lifetime, after knowing that one was only 3-5 years away. The reason I've given up is that the stem cell fundamentalists (pro-abortion NAZIs) have stolen all funding to cure diabetes, and misdirected it towards embryonic stemm cell "research." (Think Dr. Frankenstein, or a doctor at Treblinka in 1944.)
Andy Out!
I don't understand the point in this. Bush will still hate it because he's afraid of science, and the embryos that are "saved" will just be thrown away.
You sir could quite possibly be the biggest ass here. Because _YOU_ have let your life go to crap does not mean that all should be as bitter as you. Try getting out of your celler, off the liberal blogs, get a job and take control of your life and for God's sake, please stop being a victim to your laziness.