New Yorker on Perelman and Poincaré Controversy
b4stard writes "The New Yorker has an interesting article on the recent proof of the Poincaré conjecture and the controversy surrounding it. This is a very nice read, which, among other things, sheds some light on what may have motivated Perelman in refusing to accept the Fields medal." From the article: "The Fields Medal, like the Nobel Prize, grew, in part, out of a desire to elevate science above national animosities. German mathematicians were excluded from the first I.M.U. congress, in 1924, and, though the ban was lifted before the next one, the trauma it caused led, in 1936, to the establishment of the Fields, a prize intended to be 'as purely international and impersonal as possible.'"
I have discovered a truely marvelous demonstration of the Poincaré conjecture that this blog is too narrow to contain.
I thought he was a church pastor living in Ravenholm... huh... learn something new everyday.
Give it a rest, Yau.
No kidding. The real losers here are the students who are going to get shafted when all the topology texts release new editions for a footnote :P
...I haven't found it in decades of trying...
I know what you mean, I can never get away from the paparazzi! But at least here on slahdot I can lurk as "RaftPeople" without anyone realizing my incredible talent and world-wide fame.
There's a similar story about Feynman when he got the Nobel Prize for his work in quantum electrodynamics. At a lunchen given in his honor, he was asked by his introducer to explain in simple terms what his work was about. He answered, "Madam, if I were able to explain it in simple terms, they wouldn't have given me the Nobel Prize for it."
I've never heard of you except seeing KFG in some slashdot comments.
.having heard of me.
So you've never heard of me, except for . .
That ain't fame, that is seeing the same guy outside the grocery store shouting every time you go in.
That ain't me. That's RMS. I work Times Square.
KFG