Slashdot Mirror


HD Should Be Wired, For Now

AcidAUS writes "Current wireless networking standards aren't fit for streaming high-definition (HD) content between a media centre PC and multiple extender devices, according to Intel and Microsoft." From the article: "'You've also got to remember though that wired connectivity is a lot more efficient than when you start putting it [HD content] over wireless,' said O'Shea, adding that the real-world bandwidth of 802.11g would 'probably top out around 22Mbps'. Intel's Gurgen added that in addition to efficiency differences, one must also consider other network traffic when weighing up a move to wireless. 'Remember that at that one time when you're streaming content it's probably not the only thing that's happening. You could be sending e-mails, you could be downloading some sort of update,' said Gurgen. Both O'Shea and Gurgen declined to comment on whether or not the upcoming 802.11n Wi-Fi standard would make wireless streaming of HD content throughout the home viable."

3 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What a load of crap... by alexhs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your parent post lacked that detail, but Freebox uses MiMo technology, an implementation of draft 802.11n. So it has more bandwith that regular 802.11g.
    AFAIK they're also using MPEG4, which is more space efficient than MPEG2 (and I get a little less than 4Mb/s for non HDTV streams - currently no idea for HDTV streams, I lack an HDMI wire)

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  2. Re:What a load of crap... by Gobelet · · Score: 4, Informative

    In France, but in Europe globally, transmission of HDTV is made in H.264. And it's mandatory. So Free is streaming MPEG-4 HDTV content over Wi-Fi, at something like 5 or 6 Mbps. And the quality is just... wow.

  3. Re:welcome to... by megaditto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, 100 baseT is inadequate for streaming good video.

    Assume no compression (i.e. good video) 800x600 pixels, 32 bits/pxl, 30 fps

    Moving that data alone requires 500 Mbps, not counting protocol overhead. Of course, with compression you can easily cut that down by a factor of 10, but that will be lossy.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.