Slashdot Mirror


Apple and Windows Will Force Linux Underground

eastbayted writes "Tom Yager at InfoWorld predicts: 'At the end of the decade, we'll find that Apple UNIX has overtaken commercial Linux as the second most popular general client and server computing platform behind Windows.' That's not a gloom-and-doom omen for the ever-popular Linux kernel, though, he stresses. While Apple and Microsoft will grapple for dominance of client and server spaces, Linux will be 'the de facto choice for embedded solutions.' And by 'embedded,' Yager means 'specialized.' With a push of a button and a flip of switch, he predicts, you'll be able to create a configured database and a mated J2EE server — all thanks to Linux."

7 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. O RLY? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From TFA:
    ...there is exactly one Linux. It's a standard....
    ...I believe ... IBM and Oracle will use Linux to ... Push a button, you've got an enterprise database...

    Have you ever tried to get Oracle running on anything but Red Hat? When are we going to face the fact that Linux distros are different from each other? When I say "I run Linux" I've really said something as vague as (here comes the car analogy) "I drive a car" (as opposed to "I drive an Oldsmobile"). When people pick on "Linux" what are they really picking on?
    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  2. Re:Except for the fact by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Vendor lock-in is something I'm willing to live with as long as the alternatives are insufficient - and there is an alternative. I'd like the choice to be between OSX and Linux. I quite like my MacBook. It's easy to use, it looks good, it performs well for its price. While I do Linux development at work, I like to have an enjoyable experience at home.

    Slower than Linux or Windows? I'd like to see those numbers, please!

    As for serious, by what standard? I'd readily admit I would not recommend running OSX on servers unless OSX adds geniune value (as it might in a Mac-based business).

    In my world, Linux is best for backend. OSX is best for front-end. (while Windows is probably best at the standard business desktop)

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  3. Re:Embedded. by GundamFan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bank of America ATMs didn't lock up... they ran out of money or had hardware falures but they never used to lock up.

    Now they run on Windows and they do... the touch screen is (seemingly) required for operation and they stop working all the time.

    IF my life depended on Windows... really depended on it... I'd be long dead by now.

    --
    I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
    Mark Twain
  4. Re:Except for the fact by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I really just wanted to respond to this article with a gigantic Simpson-esque "HA HA".

    Indeed - it's ridiculous. You notice the weasel way they have to qualify things as well:

    By mid-2008, Apple's sales of systems with factory-installed Apple UNIX will exceed the total combined sales of x86 systems factory-shipped with commercial Linux.

    That could mean that 90% of x86 systems will be bare bones by 2008, as OEMs will choose their own version of linux to install ;-)
    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  5. Article's author scared of free software by spun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It sounds as if the author is trying to invent a reason why free software won't be free. If Linux is relegated to the embedded market, it's not really free anymore. Oh sure, you can download the open source part, but if you don't have the hardware or the bundled commercial app, it won't do much for you. He doesbn't like the idea of free software, probably feels too damn commie to him, so he invents a fantasy in which it is relegated to a role where it isn't free, and the fat happy capitalists get to make money off of it, as God intended the fat happy capitalists make money off of everything.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  6. Re:Not really by devjj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're far more likely to be taken seriously when you don't write off an entire operating system as "for people unwilling or unable to understand the guts of a microcomputer." Mac OS X is a powerful, stable platform, and you'll find that quite a few people who know and understand the guts of a computer (myself included) are using it to do far more than just surf for porn. It may not be the server operating system you're looking for, but it is far more than a "20 year old desktop-for-nubes."

  7. Re:Embedded. by Zephyr14z · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Embedded windows is ugly. I used to work a cashier job, and when I started, all of the registers had some variation of embedded linux. Eventually the touch screens started to die, so the registers were replaced with new, "better" ones. These ran XP embedded, and were nothing but trouble. Wouldn't print reciepts right, wouldn't take credit cards half the time, and just froze at least a few times a day.