Slashdot Mirror


US Government Restricting Research Libraries

An anonymous reader writes: "In a move that has been termed 'positively Orwellian' by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility Executive Director Jeff Ruch, George W. Bush is ending public access to research materials at EPA regional libraries without Congressional consent. This all-out effort to impede research and public access is a [loosely] covert operation to close down 26 technical libraries under the guise of budgetary constraint. Scientists are protesting, but at least 15 of the libraries will be closed by Sept. 30, 2006."

11 of 753 comments (clear)

  1. no surprise by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the u.s. government over the last several months has been a massive binge of re-classifying previously declassified historical documents. i think they've done maybe 50,000 of them. this administration has a culture of secrecy and limit of access to information and this move is nicely in keeping with that ideology. my source on the document reclassification is here.

  2. Book recommendation... by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Republican War on Science

    Despite the inflammatory name, the book doesn't assert that Republicans are inherently anti-science, but it is a chronicle the past few decades of politicization of science, and how even though Liberals do their own part to misrepresent science, the overwhelming lions share of open distortion percieved by the overwhelming majority of scientists has been unfortunately solidly Republican. It's a rather impressive, well-documented book that I highly recommend showing a trend of scientific limitations and games like today's story.

    Ryan Fenton

  3. Let's even narrow the scope: by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has any other US president ever done as much damage to the institution of science in the US as Bush has?

  4. Re:Mark story -1 Troll and -5 Just Plain Wrong by belmolis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Uh, according to the article you cite, Bush is taking action BEFORE Congress has had a chance to act on his budget proposal. He isn't waiting to get approval. Furthermore, they say that they will digitize the 80,000 documents beyond boxed and stored, but I'll be very interested to see how quickly that will happen and how well they will be indexed. And the point that institutional memory will be lost when librarians are laid off is not addressed at all. The article is a lot more accurate than you make out.

  5. History repeating itself? by shadowmas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What came into my mind as i read this was a documentry i once saw on Discovery channel which talked about china.

    China used to be one of the most advanced civilisations in the world. They developed so many stuff before any other country. Then suddenly some idiot in there decided to cut off china from the rest of the world and not only stop building technically advanced ships but actually destroy its unmatched fleet of ships. Shortly afterwards Britan was able to conquer the country using the technology that chinese themselves invented.

    The fact that US seems to be closing libraries makes me wonder if its another version of the same events.

  6. Re:Can you read? by belmolis · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The EPA is its own entity. It makes decisions on its own based on a plan that it generates. Do you really think Bush walked in to the EPA headquarters and said "shut it all down now!"? Try and read the story completely next time.

    If you think that because an article attributes a decision to "the EPA" that means that the decision was not made by political appointees implementing administration policy, you're incredibly naive. Bush may well not have been personally involved in this decision, but it sure looks like a political decision, not something that EPA scientists and lawyers have come up with.

    As for the scanning, did you also miss the fact that you can order whatever material you want via library loan?

    Yep, I missed it because it isn't in the article. What the article says is that "all EPA-generated materials will continue to be available by inter-library loan. That excludes material not generated by the EPA. You need to be more careful about accusing people of not reading the article. I've obviously read it more carefully than you have. Furthermore, even if this does mean that the boxed materials will be available by interlibrary loan, how easy do you think it will be to find what you need, and how long a delay will there be in getting the boxed materials out of storage? I know from personal experience that it can be a real impediment to research to have to wait several weeks or even days to get something out of storage, and that often it is difficult to identify what you need if you can't go look at it on the shelf online.

  7. Re:Wow... Now that's editorializing... by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's my question - is access to any information actually going to be lost? What resources do/did the EPA libraries provide? If it was just access to public data, I would think the Internet really would reduce the need for much more expensive libraries - so long as all the information is still available. In fact, if fraction of the budget cut were re-routed to beefing up the online archvives, access might even be improved, while still cutting cost.

  8. Re:Calling Bullshit by Malakusen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The levee system was in disrepair because the federal funding for upkeep had been slashed to pay for the war in Iraq.

    The Louisiana National Guard were all deployed to Iraq, stationed at Camp Liberty in Baghdad, while Katrina was ravaging the area.

    Bush is the commander in chief and the Army Corps of Engineer fall under him.

    Responsibility is his.

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  9. Re:Bush by masklinn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And perhaps Clinton could be accused of being distracted from foreign affairs, having become preoccupied with his own?

    Yeah that's probably why he'd been working with other nations on counter-terrorism issues since 1995, and why dozens of (potential) attentats against american lands and allies were busted under his presidencies.

    As far as Iraq goes, he stricly kept with the trade restrictions, and if you're bothered with Saddam's disregard for international laws, why ain't you disgusted by Bush&co's disregard for both national and international laws?

    Hell, even on Saddam, he was a freaking bastard, but at least he was our bastard.

    --
    "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  10. Re:Bush by HuguesT · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Free speech

    A 1-minute search on Google reveals this.

  11. Re:Bush by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The willingness of people to indiscriminately kill innocent people cannot be separated from the influence of fundamentalist religious belief.
    Don't pin it on the fundamentalist religion. The same result has been observed in Africa (Rwanda? the Congo? Algeria? Liberia? I could go on...), without an organized fundamentalist religion providing the moral justification. In the fundamentalist Moslem case, what we are seeing is religion used as a tool by those in power to both secure their hold on it and to increase it. This drama has played out all over the world throughout history, whether it's been political, tribal, national, or religious idealogy that's abused in this manner.
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai