Slashdot Mirror
Inside The Game Copy Protection Racket
simoniker writes "German game company and Accordion Hero creator Schadenfreude Interactive have been carefully considering what copy protection to use for their next game, and have documented their process in detail in a new Gamasutra article. After rejecting scratch and sniff cards, dongles, and musclebound Russian copy protection outfit NovaHammer ('You would not want any of your computer games to get hurt, would you?'), they come to the (fictional but agreeable!) conclusion: 'We decided against using any sort of copy protection on our games. After all, you shouldn't feel you are being forced to buy our games. You should want to. And if you do not want to, that is really our failure — not yours.'"
I remember losing my Prince of Persia manual and having to guess the first letter of the last word on page 30. That was annoying enough. But it's perhaps frightening commentary on the current state of DRM that I can't tell if the scratch and sniff card is or ever was real. Honestly. Was it? I can actually see a proprietary happy company like Sony coming up with something like that...
ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
Are people still copy protecting games? Why? Has a single game been rendered uncopyable because of some dodgy disk format or some stupid `squint at page 23, col 2, line 4` nonsense? Time to give it up, guys. If unprotected media works for music and films, it's good for games too.
While the gamer in me rejoices when reading this, the practicality of things are such that copy protection is needed. I agree all attempts to thwart the pirating of games never succeed 100%. But what about the vast majority of people that don't know the intricacies of bitsettings and book types and after toasting a few CDs they give up. Sure, they can get a torrent of the packaged release that circumvents these measures.
/some/ piracy will result in more money in their pockets.
But in the end stopping
How many more roubles would they get if just 1% of people intending to pirate the game bought it instead?
----
This writing may not necessarily reflect my thoughts and beliefs -- but it probably does.
a joke going right over your head. How can you take seriously an article supposedly on copy protection when it's about the designer of mockeries of real games? The site is a (good) joke, but no comments should be posted with serious thoughts on the ins and outs of copy protection. Enjoy the funny and propose something more interesting than the scratch-n-sniff dongle. The Fast and the Furriest: Drunken Swerve with a breathalysing dongle could prevent copying and unlock new swerve powers and furries for each increase of 0.01% alcohol by volume. Drink up!
I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
Games companies need to stop being so reasonable, I'm going to go broke!
All my games have been cracked before I even download them.
Heh. Silly me. I was really expecting an account of the state-of-the-art of copyright protection schemes. Y'know, Valve's details, current other mechanisms, etc.
TFA instead gives a belly-laugh of some strange russian software copyright company. Pardon the ignorance here.
I guess if I wanted to get a real summary, we go yet again to the Grouptionary.
To make sure you'll sell your game, just make sure that the official game packaging is so INCREDIBLE AMAZING AND COOL that the gamer will miss having the experience of owning it. Include a fantastic shining printed manual in full color with high-quality paper (a detailed manual, by the way), a CD whose cover has bright 3D effects, a futuristic or medievalistic box, one or more game character miniatures, coupons with codes allowing a gamer to obtain things he would love (such as game magazine subscriptions, calendars, official strategy guide etc.) at noticeable discounts as well as coupons to access ultra cool sections of the official website, such as, let's say, one where the buyer would be able to register his name and have the chance to win a trip to know the game developers with everything paid, and so on and so forth.
In short, add value to your official package by offering things a pirate would never be able to provide and people will simply prefer buying from you.
Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
Funniest damn article I've read in a long time - seriously get to page 3 it gets good.
The guy has a great point - I've bought a lot of games in recent times, sometimes long time after they were released so that the price goes down (Valve episode 1 price down you bastards - its been out long enough) and they are games I'm rather devoted to. Half-life anything, Jedi Knight and Dark Forces, Quake, C&C, AoE, Duke, Legacy of Kain, Mechwarriors, Wing Commander anything (I want more of the last three and I still hold out hope for DNF!)... its a long list. I'll probably cae on Galactic Civilizations 2 in a bit because I've been told its the games Masters 3 ought to have been.
There are games I've pirated and deleted, the latest being Prey. Meh. Make your game worthwhile to me and I will buy a copy. I remember when I was in the midst of LoK each game cost more than the last and I still bought them - fricking Defiance was 50 bucks when it came out. It was worth it and I wanted it. The prices have gone up a fair bit so I'm not surprised that piracy has. Especially when a large chunk of your target audience is under 25s and a lot of that is still in school and college earning 6.25 an hour.
The cd protection is just annoying - fricking cd-keys are such a pain to keep and I hate that I cant legally back up so many of my cds now. I tried reinstalling Diablo last year and was heart broken when the disc had a CRC error all of sudden. I bought the damn game and now I can't play it because some money grubbing bastards at Blizzard were more bothered about their profits than my fair use. Bought it used again but I really ought not to have had to. If they have to have copy protection it'd be nice if game companies just made their games FOSS after a few years because they aren't going to sell it anymore really. Abandonware is a great idea guys!
Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
I remember getting some games from Loki Software, and they were not copy protected. I dutifully purchased
my copies and requested others to purchase also, rather than just burn copies for them (though I made
backup copies for myself.) But Loki went out of business. I was under the impression that it was
because too many linux users were pirating their games, but maybe it was just that the linux market
was too small.
In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
The practicality of things is that most copy protection schemes inconvenience legitimate users.
I hate having to find/switch CDs. I really hate programs which prevent me from even running off of virtual drives so I can image the CDs rather than having to listen to my buzzing CD drive all the time, and I can't stand programs that will not let me legitimately run the game with a legitimate CD in the drive if I have virtual drive software installed on my machine.
And when I find a form of copy-protection annoying enough, I no longer purchase games which use that method, because it's less effort to warez it than it is to fiddle around with my system to get the copy-protection working.
So, game publishers: Get with the program. If you release good games which don't inconvenience the user, I'm a potential buyer. Otherwise, the best you can hope for is that I'll check it out with warez and buy the sequel if you've learned your lesson.
Today's object example:
Battlefield 2: Copy-protected to some degree, but mainly relying on individual CDkeys to encourage players to purchase for online play, doesn't hassle me about running it off an image, and since I've got my CD key stored securely and everyone I know has the game, I don't have to worry about losing my disks. Excellent game. Total sales to me: $50 + $30 expansion pack.
Silent Hunter III: Copy-protected with StarForce, known for being nasty and occasionally *damaging DVD drives*. Since they still haven't released an official no-starforce patch for SH3, the only way of getting rid of the Starforce crap is warezing it, so total sales to me = $0. Great game though,and SH4 won't be using StarForce so I'll definitely pick that up when it comes out.
Galactic Civilizations II: No copy-protection, legitimate purchase provides the option of free access through an online account for new patches/content, no hassle, ongoing support. Total sales to me = $50.
"We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
Right now, NWN 1 has piracy protection done right. After patch 1.66, NWN doesn't need the CD. However if you want to play multiplayer online (and possibly automatic update, not sure), you need to have a valid CD key stored on Bioware/Gamespy's servers. Pirated CD key? It gets disabled in their database. Keygens? Yes, they fool the client, but because Bioware's servers have a list of genuine keys, it won't get far when going online.
This is enough protection to keep 95% of the people from pirating the game. The last 5% will end up finding a crack from somewhere and bypassing it, even if it entails yanking hardware cables to disable physical drives.
Thumbs up, Bioware.
who said Germans have no sense of humour ;-)
By far the most annoying thing I've found about driver-based copy protection is that not one of them works on windows 64-bit. There are many games that I -have- to crack because otherwise they won't run on my pc at all. A friend of mine mentioned that he has a game that is like this (can't remember the name), but the company making the copy-protection HAS released a 64-bit version that works with 32-bit games, but atari (I think) won't release a patch for the game that includes it, forcing him to crack it anyway.
Just don't copy-protect games, ok? Microsoft don't stop people copying their disks, in fact the tools for ripping the image to iso, integrating a new service pack and burning it back to disk still bootable are freely available (Microsoft even make disk images downloadable, especially for the MSDNAA).
Instead make the game either need activating online or only restrict the online play to stop people who are using the same serial key. Don't do anything aggressive either, requiring a reinstall which nukes saves to change to a legally bought key will not encourage people to buy your game.
All in all, the best games for working on 64 bit edition (imo) are UT2004 (doesn't require the cd after a particular patch and there's a 64-bit version now too), any steam game (hl2 or cs:s etc) again, don't need a cd to play and are 64-bit, any number of mmo games (none that I know of need a cd to play, most don't even need a cd to install).
Or, I have a suggestion if you really want copy protection: put it in the installer on the cd. Make the installer validate your key and check the authenticity of the disk, then let the installed game run without it. Combine with the "can't play multiplayer with the same key" protection and you'll have a relatively effective protection system that fewer people will complain about. Sure, people will crack the installer eventually, but it will take them longer to crack than the game exe (at least I think so, you'd have to ask a cracker really).