Wayback Machine Safe, Settlement Disappointing
Jibbanx writes "Healthcare Advocates and the Internet Archive have finally resolved their differences, reaching an undisclosed out-of-court settlement. The suit stemmed from HA's anger over the Wayback Machine showing pages archived from their site even after they added a robots.txt file to their webserver. While the settlement is good for the Internet Archive, it's also disappointing because it would have tested HA's claims in court. As the article notes, you can't really un-ring the bell of publishing something online, which is exactly what HA wanted to do. Obeying robots.txt files is voluntary, after all, and if the company didn't want the information online, they shouldn't have put it there in the first place."
http://www.archive.org/
so if my content is behind a protected "members area" then it is still public domain and should be freely available? If I am a photographer, and my site clearly states that all images are copyright of a certain date and that use of them without my permission is forbidden, that means nothing? If someone uses images of me without my permission, that they got from a website or protected members area, how is it that I can get them removed by complaining? If they are public domain, then it should be my tough luck, right?
If I post your credit card and bank information on a forum site, does that mean it is now public domain and you have no protection?
If I post on a forum site that I am selling stolen credit card info and bank info, my post should not be touched, because it is public domain and it should be freely available?
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
Wrong, wrong, wrong. archive.org explicitly tells you that if you want your content removed from their index, that you should modify your robots.txt and re-submit your site, and when their bot reads your robots.txt and sees the appropriate directives, your content will be dropped from the index. See:
http://www.archive.org/about/faqs.php#2
http://web.archive.org/web/20050305142910/http://
Let's review the text here, just in case someone from archive.org scurries to change it:
Addendum: An Example Implementation of Robots.txt-based Removal Policy at the Internet Archive
By not honoring those directives, are they not engaging in both copyright infringement and fraud?
The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50