Slashdot Mirror
Pluto Making a Comeback
anthemaniac writes "Space.com reports that the American Astronomical Unions Division of Planetary Scientists recognizes the IAU's authority to make a new planet defintion but expects it to be altered. Separately, 300 astronomers have signed a petition saying they won't use the definition. All this stems from the discontent over how only 424 astronomers voted on the proposal that demoted Pluto. Looks like this little dog is on the comeback trail."
Nope, that's Venus and Earth. Mars is about one-third the mass of earth, IIRC.
Quoth the wikipedia, "Mars has half the radius of the Earth and only one-tenth the mass, being less dense, but its surface area is only slightly less than the total area of Earth's dry land".
Your post intrigued me, and after some quick research with the help of Google, I agree. You can fire up Celestia and actually see some of them, just make asteroid orbits and names visible. Pluto fits right in with them; it seems to be the largest of them.
For you unbelievers, here's a list. These objects are all out of the "normal" plane of orbits, just like Pluto.
Name, Radius
Pluto, 1,151km
Ixion, 600km
Quaoar, 625km
Orcus, 800km
Varuna, 450km
And these are just some "nicely named" ones. See "2003 EL61", "2005 FY9", etc for more examples. And you can add more as well. For those with computers that aren't slow, this page contains a Celestia ssc of 1007(!) TNOs. Doughnut shaped indeed.
Also, there is a class (like 20%-30%) of them called Plutinos which share Pluto's stable 3:2 orbital resonance with Neptune. How did this come to be? There are theories, but nothing definitive yet.
The debate will continue, but if you look at that Celestia ssc of 1007 TNOs, it is pretty clear that Pluto is not a "major planet". If it is, then we've got dozens, possibly hundreds of them.
(Apologies if this has been covered before.)
Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
You do realize that Ceres was classified as a planet before the discovery of more asteroids, right?
What makes the Kuiper belt so different that its inhabitants get to be planets, and the asteroids don't?
Pluto should have never been classified as a planet, and was only done so for political reasons, not scientific. It's not in a standard orbit like a planet, it highly eccentric, crossing Neptune's orbit as well as being tilted significantly in the plane of the solar system as compared to the other planets. It's moon is over half its own diameter.
It's probably a rock/ice blob from the Oort cloud that came too close to one of the gas giants and ended up in a roughly stable orbit. It's more like a failed comet than a planet.
Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.