Slashdot Mirror


Sweden's Watergate

An anonymous reader writes, "Sweden's ruling Social Democratic Party's internal network has been illegally accessed several hundred times over a period of several months. Party treasurer Tommy Ohlstroem describes the incident as "wide-scale and systematic." Computer security company Sentor's investigation has revealed intrusions originating from computers belonging to Sweden's Liberal Party, and with the upcoming election in only two weeks many commentators are already describing this as Sweden's Watergate (Swedish only). An employee of the Young Liberals has admitted to unauthorized access, but a series of mysterious coincidences in the form of exceptionally well timed public announcements by the Liberal Party suggests the involvement of more than one person."

179 comments

  1. Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    saying 'Liberal' in Sweden is not the same as saying 'liberal' in the USA. Of the two major Swedish political parties, the liberals are the more right leaning. In the US however, both swedish parties however would be generally considered to be left of the Democrats.

    (Generally, I don't find terms like 'left' or 'right' helpful for a serious political discussion, but it will do for slashdot)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of the two major Swedish parties, Socialdemokraterna and Moderaterna, neither are liberal. The liberals would be Folkpartiet (10% or so).

    2. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I guess that's why the ghost of Richard Nixon is being invoked here. Nothing scarier than America's favorite political boogyman.

    3. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      OK, ok. I admit it. You were right and I was wrong. Would you please change your sig?

    4. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by crull · · Score: 1

      I think he meant of the two major blocks of parties, and that the liberals belongs to the right leaning one.

      --
      this is not my signature.
    5. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Saying 'Liberal' in Sweden is not the same as saying 'liberal' in the USA.

      I don't think "Liberal" means what people think it means.

      I once was repeating something I heard on an AM radio program that's usually considered 'right-wing' and the person who heard said "That's a typical Liberal attitude!"

      I snickered a bit. Or once a friend of mine was saying how in her town some Liberals passed an ordinance that prohibits signs on people's yards.

      I don't know what Liberal means anymore.

      Or the one that really gets me is the "right" wing Christians who are so against the ("Liberal") war protesters.

      Um, excuse me, but wasn't there this long-haired-sandle-wearing guy in the Bible who said something like "Blessed are the peace makers...."

      But hey! No self repecting Christian would fall for such "Liberal" shit!

    6. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Folkpartiet liberalerna are not one of the two major parties. My bad, Feel free to mod down my GP post :-)

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    7. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia actually defines them as center-right and has a "strong ideological commitment to a free-market economy combined with support for comprehensive social welfare programs." That sounds pretty much like the Dem's in the US. Plus, they've apparently taken a cue from American neo-cons by imitating their election tactics: "Since 2002 the party has been accused of trying to attract new voters by adopting right-wing populist rhetoric."

    8. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      Except the part about a "strong commitment to a free-market economy." Other than that, yeah, sounds like Democrats in the US.

    9. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only bearded guy the falsely named "anti war movement" (pro-terrorist) like to follow is Usama Bin Laden.

      Why does being anti-war make someone pro-terrorist?

      Why is it if you're against someone you're for the other guy?

      Why is it if it's black then it's not white?

      What's with the attitude of "you're either for us or against us"?

      Adults realize that there are shades of gray in life and you can disagree without being "against" anyone.

    10. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by salimma · · Score: 1
      ... center-right and has a "strong ideological commitment to a free-market economy combined with support for comprehensive social welfare programs." That sounds pretty much like the Dem's in the US ...


      The *centrist* Democrats. The left "liberal" wing of the Democratic party was against NAFTA and FTAA.
      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    11. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by grimJester · · Score: 2, Informative

      To elaborate, in Sweden both 'conservative' and 'liberal' are considered right wing, with liberal = economy liberal = market forces know best and conservative = social conservative = think of the children.

      Right = anti-immigration, being tough on crime, corporate interests etc. Racism to keep the rabble happy while the rich suck them dry.

    12. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swedens news can be heard at radiosweden.org in text and in an audio format .
      They have a very nice daily programs as well as some special topics that you may find interesting.

      I agree , as I listen to the media above, the terms liberal and conservative do not quite seem to apply in the USA context.

    13. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Adults realize that there are shades of gray in life and you can disagree without being "against" anyone.

      Wait, wouldn't that brand all of the GOP-supporter GWBush backers "immature whinny little fuckheads"?

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    14. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or the one that really gets me is the "right" wing Christians who are so against the ("Liberal") war protesters.


      Shouldn't the "Christians" be the word in quotes?
    15. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by aristolochene · · Score: 1

      George Bush(es), Thatcher, Reagan all espouse(d) a classicly liberal economics - belief in unfettered the free market economy. Socially they may be highly conservative...

      Chec out http://www.politicalcompass.org/ for a new way of looking at ideas of left/right/liberal/conservative.
      --
      echo $SIGNATURE
    16. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Opie812 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      saying 'Liberal' in Sweden is not the same as saying 'liberal' in the USA.

      I'm no expert, but I'd suggest that the United States is the only country in the world where 'liberal' is a derogatory term.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    17. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative ?

      You explained the "Normal" Left and the "Extrem" Right.

    18. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1

      To be fair are they any true leftist parties anywhere in western democracy? And I'm talking powerfull parties either in government or opposition. There are many that claim to be but as soon as they get in power the ideals that got them elected seem to dissapear and they follow exactly the same policy as a 'right wing' party.

    19. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, right and left are very poor. The problem is that the republicans used it to say that they were the "right" wing (vs. wrong). To counter the dems turned it into a choice of left/right. Now we are stuck with 2 very corrupt and worthless parties while excluding other parties with new ideas and good values.

    20. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      He didn't explain any Left. Left is socialism.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    21. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by DaveRexel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No need for downmodding, the "Folkpartiet liberalerna are not one of the two major parties" as it's true that they belong very firmly to a grouped entity that forms the right-wing coalition in Swedish politics.

      The largest party in the opposing coalition, that is "Socialdemokraterna" is the hackee and this smaller party in the other block is the hacker, but, living in Sweden, my suspicions run deeper than this:

      *- A focus on hacking so the governors can impose higher surveillance.
            Remember the ruling Swedish coalition, with the Socialdemokraterna in the leadership;
            Taking orders from Hollywood and confiscating the Pirate Bay servers...

      *- A very Swedish joke, i.e. an easily exposed attempt
            - that shows the oppositions lack of IT-skills
                (That's a head-shot in the pre-election posturing IMHO)

      *- This breach is old news, why expose it now?

      *- Profit!! [Sorry, can't ever make a list without Profit! at the end ;-) ]

      --
      # ~: no sigs today
    22. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Engine · · Score: 1

      Calling any of the four major right wing parties in Sweden racists is just bullshit. I can't believe this post is moderated informative. Even though they are proposing that immigrants should be required to take part in swedish education to benefit from the full social service, they are not against immigration. And certainly not racists! It was the left wing in sweden that warned about "social tourism" a few years back.

      I'll actually vote for a left wing party september 17, but I can not stand see such nonsense as in grimmJesters post.

    23. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2, Informative
      Right = anti-immigration, being tough on crime, corporate interests etc. Racism to keep the rabble happy while the rich suck them dry.


      I'm Swedish and I'm pretty leftist, but that is plain FUD.

      Anti-immigration and racism:
      It holds true to the extreme right-wing parties that are not in the Swedish Riksdag, such as Nationaldemokraterna (openly racist, pseudo-nazi party), Sverigedemokraterna (ultra-nationalists) and such, but not the etablished right-wing parties. If you count HBQT-intolerance (homo/bi/queer/trans) and general bigotism you can put Kristdemokraterna (The Christian Democrats, ultra-conservative) in this group though...

      Corporate interests:
      That holds true to both sides. The exceptions are Miljöpartiet (The Greens, centre liberals currently allied with the left-wing parties) and Vänsterpartiet (former communist party). The Social Democrats are very much on the right (non-left) side of the scale in regard to corporate interests.

      Being touch on crime:
      All parties want to be tough on crime, they only differ on what type of crimes to prioritize. The Social Democrats (left, currently the biggest party in Sweden) have (obviously) made filesharing one of their top priorities. As they have shown the last years they also want to abandon our famous open and liberal society by removing our constitutional right to anonymous communication and privacy at home by creating insane surveillance laws allowing the police to bug anyone they like, even if they aren't suspected of a crime. What's even worse is that the right block's minister of justice (if they win the election) is just as bad or worse in this regard... Both sides are sucking Bush's and Blair's asses in the war-against-terrorism-nonsence.

      That's why I voted for Piratpartiet - The Pirate Party, the only party that REALLY care about your freedom of speech, freedom of expression, your right to privacy and will fight against patents and reform the copyright law to make it reasonable for both customers and authors. (no, lifetime + 70 years isn't reasonable. ~20 years after release is reasonable.)
      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    24. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by lordmetroid · · Score: 1

      I have investigated this further... It seems like one can easily login as guest/guest or in this case someones name repeated as both password and username. I think it says more of the actuall negligence of security protocolls from the social democratic party.

    25. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by DaveRexel · · Score: 1

      Sorry for replying to my own post but one could construe from my parent post that I support the right-wing block.

      Th is not applicable as I think they are even more malleable by corporate powers than the Socialdemokraterna who have long abandoned their duties to the workers.

      As a guesture of extreme dissatisfatction with the present political lineup in Sweden my vote would probablt go to the Pirate Party as a big FU to the ptitful array of parties and policies that is apparent just now.

      --
      # ~: no sigs today
    26. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by NickeZ · · Score: 0, Troll

      Try living in Sweden. The social democrats are actually working with two communist parties right now. Vänsterpartiet and Miljöpartiet. None of them believe in private companies. I can't stand it but I'm to young to migrate and I really think the blue parties (right wing) will win this election.

    27. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of leftist parties in western democracy, and some right wing ones. The leftist ones might not enforce personal freedoms as well as they should, but the same is true of the right wing parties and reduced spending/free market. So, they both stick to regulating more in their area (economical/personal), but they begin regulating the other area too.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    28. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      It depends what you mean... for example, G. W. Bush proposed a plan to allow people in the U.S. to invest some of their social security deductions... this was characterized as some sort of Right Wing Plot to Impoverish Our Seniors by the left in the U.S. ... At the same time, Bush's plan was largely based on a plan in Sweden that had support from the Social Democrats (which should supposedly be left of U.S. Democrats).

      So you have the left wing in the United States, accusing the right wing of the United States of being ultra right wing in an economic plan that was invented by the Swedish left wing.

      Which all means that left-wing right-wing classifications are pretty much useless any more... and that either the U.S. isn't as right, or Sweden isn't as left, as some people tend to believe.

    29. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Richard Nixon isn't nearly as scary as Bush. I guess when someone compares some political abuse to Bush you'll claim the same about Bush. Do you complain the same way when people bring up Hoover?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    30. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "Liberal" really means essentially "of/for/from/with freedom", the reason "liberal" and "liberty" sound so similar. It usually is in reference to some existing/previous condition of constraint. "Trade liberalism" means unregulated trade. "Liberal" as in socialism or just America's government mediation of economics or society means freedom from oppression generally. Ironically many people think that kind of freedom is produced by less freedom to oppress, which often translates to just less freedom when the bureaucrats get hold of it.

      American politics is so twisted now that "Conservatives" don't conserve but rather discard, "Liberals" impose restraints, and "neoconservatives" are really "neoliberal" ideologists/rhetoricians. At least we're not Canada, whose "Progressive Conservative Party" really threw out all meaning in favor of marketing buzzwords.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    31. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Physician · · Score: 1

      You don't sound the least bit biased!

      --
      Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
    32. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      That's just plain wrong. Neither the Left party nor the Environmental party have communist ideals, and both of them believe in private companies. Just because they believe in higher taxes and a generous welfare state does not make them communist. It's a complete lie, there is not an ounce of truth in what you are saying.

    33. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      George Bush(es), Thatcher, Reagan all espouse(d) a classicly liberal economics - belief in unfettered the free market economy.

      The current US Government (ie: George Bush) is about as protectionist as they come...

    34. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The reference to Richard Nixon was because of the Watergate reference. Nixon will always hold a special place in the American political psyche as the first president to resign from the office. As for Bush, he'll be another forgotten president just like Hoover.

    35. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by ppanon · · Score: 1

      There hasn't been a Progressive Conservative party in Canada for a few years now.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    36. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Heh, you wish. I saw a really funny bumper sticker on a recent-model Volvo sedan when driving through the Seattle area recently. It said:

      I miss Nixon.

      P.S. Being in Canada, so far, I miss Joe Clarke and Trudeau. The Conservatives should worry about me thinking that I miss Mulroney.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    37. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Bush's social security reform was shot down mearly because it was "Bush's social security reform" It was nothing but good for a broken system. You even see Democrats cheering that they shot it down. Not that they fixed anything just that they were able to make it not pass out of pure spite for GWB. With all the crap that GWB does, he has one decent plan and the Dems shot it down. No I'm not bitter.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    38. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by nr · · Score: 1

      Do you rememeber that VP (Vänster Partiet) was formerly named VPK (Vänster Partiet Kommunisterna) and have always been in support of the Sovjet Union and Castros Cuba. I would not say they are pro-market as they are against privately owned schools, hospitals, healthcare and childcare.

    39. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did know that, because as it happends, I am not an idiot. The left party changed their name for a reason, they stopped advocating communist ideas. The fact thay you think someone is communist because they want public schools, hospitals and healthcare shows that you have no idea whatsoever what communism is. Having a large welfare state is not communism. Making sure that everyone can recieve the most basic needs from the government, an education, healthcare from the best healthcare system in the world and for their children to be placed in a safe environment is not communism. I'm personally for such policies, but even if I weren't, I wouldn't be stupid enough to call it communism. No one with even the slightest knowledge of political science would.

      Stop saying big words you don't understand. You look foolish doing it.

    40. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Sippan · · Score: 0

      Here's an example of how liberal they aren't: two of the posters in their election campaign are "let's make it easier for cops to wiretap people" and "let's force immigrants to learn Swedish before they can become citizens". Oh they're way liberal all right. (Pun!)

      --
      Frog blast the vent core.
    41. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by NickeZ · · Score: 1

      Lars ohly (leader of VP) still said "If I would be in charge I would have more power". And since he was calling himself a communist and hasn't changed ideals I think he still is.

    42. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by NickeZ · · Score: 1

      And the fact that the "miljöpartiet" believes in citizen salary makes them communists..

    43. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Big+Nothing · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep. Just like "intellectual".

      *sigh*

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    44. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same is true in other European countries such as the Netherlands. They all use a version which boils down to "liberal for economy".

      Liberal is an opposite of authoritarian. Anarchists in the early 1900s were called "liberals". I'd say that if you advocate an anarchy even the term "liberal" is an incorrect definition. Originally, the word has nothing to do with "left" or "right" let alone politics. If you look at the original Latin meaning and cut any political crap which might have contamined your view on the word, you'd agree. Heck, I just typed dict liberal in a shell prompt and saw nothing about politics whatsover.

      In the USA "liberal" is often a synonym for "progressive" and often means the opposite of "conservative", but "conservative" is not a synonym for "authoritarian" whereas "progressive" is an opposite of "conservative". Well, conservative in what? Progressive in what? Liberal in what?

      Neither America's not Europe's definition are similar, nor is either correct. They're all marketing terms, meant for purposes such as polarisation or differentiation. What matters is their actual plans and the practical means of them. I personally don't vote at all since to me its all the same: a broken system not addressing problems I find important. Such as a fraudulent, terrorising tax system (IRS) in the case of the USA.

    45. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by lupine_stalker · · Score: 1

      Well you'd be right. I'd like to add that its interesting how conservative most of these "liberal" parties are... maybe because they are all aged 40+, eh?

      --
      Ninjas use italics.
    46. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for getting things immediately off topic, din kolossala idiot.

    47. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be proud of your trolling. Not ashamed.

    48. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "why now" part is actually quite easy: Someone contacted a journalist at DI who then alerted the social democrats. They hadn't known about it until quite recently.

    49. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by codonaill · · Score: 1

      Try Australia...

    50. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      People who forgot Hoover, his Great Depression, his "Hoovervilles" of refugee shanty camps, will forget any president not worshipped like a god (Reagan/Kennedy/FDR) or demonized (Nixon/Carter). We have 2 more years in which anything can happen to brand Bush into the American psyche. But I think he'll be remembered for generations, as his legacy will last for dozens if not hundreds of years.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    51. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      So they neither stayed the same nor moved into the future. Canny Canadians, with your common sense. Balanced by your "open minds", which actually voted the PCs (hah) into power in Ontario.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    52. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by tbannist · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it was a decent plan? The idea seems solid, until you look at the details and realize it was planned to fail. Sometimes an idea gets shot down based on the implementation plan being aweful and unfixable.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    53. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by tbannist · · Score: 1

      In case you didn't know the "Progressive Conservative Party" was formed by the merger of the "The Progressive Party" and "The Conservative Party". Progressive Conservative was actually a decent name for them, they tended to be socially liberal and fiscally conservative. They no longer exist, they merged with "The Alliance Party" which was formerly known as the Reform party and almost known as the Conservative Reform Alliance Party, but someone tried to make a t-shirt with the acronym and realized it would sell too well. The Reform party was actually just the social conservatives who quit the Progressive Conservative party in the mid 90s. So the new Conservative Party of Canada is now a lite version of American Politics, socially conservative and fiscally ambiguous.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    54. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Imsdal · · Score: 1
      The left party changed their name for a reason, they stopped advocating communist ideas.

      Not true. They stopped calling themselves communists because they found that doing that would allow them to gain a large chunk of the leftmost votes from the Social Democrats. They were indeed correct about that. When they called themselves communists, they just barely got 4% of the vote (the level required to stay in parliament). Since the change, they have more or less doubled in size.

      Just last year, the party leader publicly declared that he would stop referring to himself as a communist "because people would misunderstand that" (i.e. think about Stalin, Mao and the other mass murderers.). Please not that he specifically did *not* say that he was no longer a communist. The very clear message was that he still is, but doesn't want to repel some voters.

      In fairness, it should be said that there is a power struggle in the party between the traditionalists and the "renewers". A few years ago, it looked like the renewers would win, in which case it would be unfair to call the a communist party. However, lately, the traditionalists have more or less taken over the party. These are the exact same people who gladly acccepted money from the Soviet Union 30-40 years ago.

    55. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      A useful way to think of the term liberal, is big 'L' Liberal for political parties that believe the state should not interfere in the paid for right of the minority rich to exploit the majority poor, other than of course, legally and violently enforcing that inherited privilege.

      While small 'l' liberal relates to liberal and free thinkers, people who are far more likely to believe in social democracy (again ignore political party labelling abuses), that is, responsible government is about striving to achieve the healthiest and happiest society possible for the majority.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    56. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, after a century of "intellectuals" who treat themselves as demi-gods for earning a PhD and then defining day=night and black=white, the general public tends to get jaded.

    57. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by retrosteve · · Score: 1
      Yep. Just like "intellectual". Don't worry, there's plenty of good precedent for that. "Intellectual" has been a bad word many times, in lots of regimes the US would be proud to emulate, such as:
      • Pol Pot's regime in Cambodia
      • the "Cultural Revolution" in China
      • ...bunch I can't think of here, and
      • of course Orwell's 1984.
      Good start, USA.
    58. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are older than I imagined.

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

    59. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Ick. neither one sound like any party that I would like to have in charge.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    60. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by ksheff · · Score: 1

      so what's the solution for the aweful and unfixable system already in place?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    61. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by ksheff · · Score: 1

      and that's one of the reasons why many conservatives are upset with the current administration. Especially, when it comes to spending.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    62. Re:Explanation of 'swedish liberal' by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      exactly even if Bush's plan was aweful and unfixable it was less so of each than the current system, and it would have given people ownership. Otherwise we are just betting that the next round of polititians will make the right decisions. Doesn't matter which side you root for that is a scary thought.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  2. I've always been suspicious of the Swedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...ever since ABBA won the Eurovision contest.

    1. Re:I've always been suspicious of the Swedes by legoburner · · Score: 1

      Ikea is the source of mistrust of sweden for me.

    2. Re:I've always been suspicious of the Swedes by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      [blockquote]Ikea is the source of mistrust of sweden for me.[/blockquote] And vikings! They don't get nearly as much attention as pirates and ninjas, but they are pretty sneeky!

    3. Re:I've always been suspicious of the Swedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't trust Swedish cuisine, personally. Just what the hell is a lingonberry, anyway? And what kind of meat do they use in those deliciously addictive meatballs of theirs? If you try to get straight answers out of one of their chefs, they get all evasive, and start saying things like, "Bork bork bork!" I don't know what that means, but I think it's an insult. Sweden is not to be trusted.

    4. Re:I've always been suspicious of the Swedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to spoil your joke, but Abba is probably the only halfway decent thing as far as popular appeal goes to ever have been in Eurovision contest. They're the only ones to actually have had a career afterwards AFAIK.

  3. Same U/P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He had the same username as password:)

  4. A Bunch Of Blondes In a Political Scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm... The mind boggles, just mental think of the Watergate scandal being pulled of by a bunch of blondes.

    Might have great potential for a comedy skit.

    1. Re:A Bunch Of Blondes In a Political Scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Mental think"? It sounds like these blondes are a tad smarter than you. Racist fucktard.

      If you think the blonde race has it tough, try being a bald-American.

  5. In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bob Woodward was seen headed for Sweden.

  6. As always, Germany is just a step ahead... by DoktorTomoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... over here, not members of opposing parties are opening the respective other boxes, but email is illegaly read by members of the own conservative party CDU without consent... See http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/77680 for further information (or Googlelated)

  7. Seems like a borrowed idea by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just before 2006's Hungarian Parliamentary Election, the Hungarian Socialist Party accused the Alliance of Young Democrats with accessing the private server of theirs. The "proof" was a screenshot from a Win2003 server log showing the host belonging to the party. The accused party countered by showing proof that their internal site was systematically accessed by the other party, also showing logs.

    The internal server of the Socialist Party turned out to be a password protected http server containing some upcoming promotional campaign pictures, with some trivial password like hsp:redflower. The pass somehow leaked and thousands of other people viewed it, myself included, before it became a "scandal" and "proof of hacking" and "ServerGate".

    I hope the swedish parties are more grown up than to play stupid games like that and I hope the swedish public is more educated than the hungarian, so that they can tell if nothing extraordinarily happened, just some PR hype..

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Seems like a borrowed idea by jonask · · Score: 0

      Well, so far two fairly important members of the Liberal party have admitted to doing it. Whether they were the only ones and what they did with the information I haven't heard anything about. (And why the **** they did it from the party headquarters...)

      The intranet apparently did contain some interesting information (as opposed to the Hungarian situation), but the password *was* trivial. /Jonas

    2. Re:Seems like a borrowed idea by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Addendum: The Hungarian Socialist Party is used to be called the Hungarian Socialist Workers' Party (the state party before the fall of the iron curtain), before it got "unfashionable". They are socialist only in their name, in reality they lean towards serving the interests of corporations and the wealthy.

      The Alliance of Young Democrats is just a name, the party started in 1988 in a college. They have been the main government party before and they are the main opposition party now. They cannot said to be belonging to right or left, they have left-like social policies in education, health, etc. and they also have a stronger sense of patriotism/nationalism than the other parties and a very good relationship with the traditional religions. The stereotype calls them right-wing, but it just doesn't fit given their economic/social policies. Right/left wing is a silly categorization imo.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    3. Re:Seems like a borrowed idea by jiushao · · Score: 1

      I hope the swedish parties are more grown up than to play stupid games like that and I hope the swedish public is more educated than the hungarian, so that they can tell if nothing extraordinarily happened, just some PR hype.

      A little from column A and a little from column B, the username and password used to illegally access the site were much too simple, but the site does contain extremely sensitive information such as classified reports from the security police. Overall I think it is fair to say that it is an extremely serious offense for a party to meddle in that way.

    4. Re:Seems like a borrowed idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's more than promotional brochures. From one of TFA's


      The 24 year old was said to be able to see secret information about Social Democrat strategies, plans for the election campaign and information from the security police.


      I know it's slashdot so it's customary not to read the articles, but it still doesn't make you look any less an idiot for commenting on something you havent' read. All it means is that you are one among many who also like an idiot.
    5. Re:Seems like a borrowed idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overall _I_ think it is fair to say that it is extremely stupid to put classified reports from the security police on a public, unencrypted, webserver, only protected by a clear-text html password.

    6. Re:Seems like a borrowed idea by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      The person from the liberal youth party has already come forward with this so it's known it happened.

      He claims in turn that he got the user credentials (well, just really needed a user name because the password was the same :-p) from this targetted socialist party's youth party, SSU. This was flat out denied by them. So right now it's pretty much impossible who of them is lying, but one of them are anyway. If SSU indeed handed out this info (sounds strange given it's for their own party, but who knows, it could've been a pissed of teenager) this case would quickly turn from a very serious accusation to a quite humorous one.

      But something has happened here, the question at this point is mostly who the liberal youth party member got hold of the information and could connect to their internal network. It sure doesn't sound far fetched it was done with help from the inside.

      Also note that the liberal party said they were unaware of this incident and what this member of their youth party had done, and they'll cooperate in prosecuting this guy. Hard to tell if that's the truth too, of course. Only the liberal party knows for sure at this point. Neither them telling the truth nor lying sounds illogical.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    7. Re:Seems like a borrowed idea by manwal · · Score: 1

      The internal server of the Socialist Party turned out to be a password protected http server containing some upcoming promotional campaign pictures, with some trivial password like hsp:redflower.

      This wasn't a web server, but a FirstClass-system. The hacked account had access to all information, which is something only 26 people outside the central administration of the socialdemocratic party has.

      The information accessed included detailed plans for the last days of the electorial campaign. Also, there were confidential information from the Swedish Secret Service (SäPo) concerning the personal security of several ministers. Some news sources also claimed there might have been access to internal documents from a company owned by the socialdemocratic party. A few leaked campaign posters are nothing compared to this.

      I hope the swedish parties are more grown up than to play stupid games like that and I hope the swedish public is more educated than the hungarian, so that they can tell if nothing extraordinarily happened, just some PR hype..

      There has yet to be a PR hype - the socialdemocrats hasn't said anything after the initial announcement, where they said they would wait until the police investigation finishes before making any political statements on this.

  8. It's probably not close to Watergate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we have here is just regular old fashoned political dirty tricks and oneupmanship. Watergate was about a paranoid president with a list of enemies who he was willing to use the state's power to crush. The corruption started at the top. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal

    Of course people didn't learn. We had the Iran-Contra affair a little later under Regan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Contra_Affair

    I can't believe that Sweden has stooped quite as low.

    1. Re:It's probably not close to Watergate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Believe it or not, European society is no better than that of the U.S. This may come as a shock to many that hold Europe's socialistic tendencies to be the golden model for which we should strive.

    2. Re:It's probably not close to Watergate by megaditto · · Score: 1

      I think the issue here is not the dirty tricks per se, but trying to cover those up. Nixon and Clinton suffered the consequences of their lies, while Reagan was forgiven since he admitted the deed and said he was sorry before the coverup grew big enough to bite him in the arse.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    3. Re:It's probably not close to Watergate by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The enemies list and the dirty tricks were an offense against the spirit of democracy, but as you say that wasn't Watergate.

      The break in at the Watergate was not most of the Watergate story, although it was the germ from which the scandal of Watergate grew. It was, as you say, just dirty tricks.

      What Watergate was about was about the Nixon administration trying to cover up the Watergate break in, and in the course of doing so using the powers of the Presidency to undermine the law. Every American has been taught: the powers of the President are granted to uphold the law and defend the nation. It is obvious to all but the most partisan Americans that when a President uses his powers to undermine the law, it is an abomination that strikes at the foundation of our nation's identity.

      The single act that fatally poisoned the Nixon presidency was when he fired Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor, for getting too close to the truth. When he was fired, he said this: "Whether ours shall be a government of laws and not of men is now for Congress and ultimately the American people." It was a ringing endorsement of the American people, and a throwing down of the guantlet in the court of public opinion. My mother-in-law was a Harvard Law School secretary for many years, and Archibald Cox was one of "her" professors. During the Iran Contra scandal, he remarked to her that it was unlikely that much would come of it, because when a President decides to break the law, there is really no practical way to stop him, unless the American people rise up against him. In Watergate, American public opinion rose up agains the President. In Iran Contra, it may have disagreed with him, but it did not rise up as a whole.

      Over the many years I've been following politics, one thing has become very clear: democracy doesn't ensure that politicians pursue wise or virtuous policies. Vietnam, the Watergate coverup, Iran-Contra, the second Iraw War; no practical democratic system can prevent such misadventures from starting.

      The great virtue of democracy lies not in preventing folly, but in the inevitability of people doing collectively what individuals who have identified themselves with a disasterous plan seldom can: they change their mind.

      I like to remember this when prospects for my country look bleak, so that I can never be totally discouraged. Over time, there are truths that are too large and connected to too many lives to be hidden. Inevitably, the scales fall from the people's eyes, and when that day comes it is a day of reckoning for politicians who pursue the Big Lie. It does not prevent untold harm from befalling; indeed it is only great harm that brings this about. But as long as there is any memory of democracy, any shred of the democratic spirit left in us, we will exercise the greatest democratic right of all: throwing the bums out.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:It's probably not close to Watergate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Huh? Reagan admitted nothing. Rather, he just kept denying having any knowledge of the whole event at all. It was eventually Oliver North and a few others who took the fall.

      I remember the tribunals, and his endless stream of "uh, I don't recall" to most questions and apparently not knowing what his administration was doing did not make him look good.

    5. Re:It's probably not close to Watergate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People believing that Reagan didn't recall was helped by the fact that he gave the impression that he probably couldn't recall what he'd had for breakfast that morning. Nixon and Clinton were both either too smart or too dumb, depending on your point of view.

      (and this isn't attempting to make any moral equivalence between the actions of any of the last seven presidents - that's a different argument)

    6. Re:It's probably not close to Watergate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In March 1987 Reagan said:
      A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me thats true. But the facts and the evidence tell me it is not.
  9. Re:PW = dictionary = ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you're not suggesting that it is legal to enter as long as the password is a simple one?

  10. Many misleading statements by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 5, Informative

    1, 84 times not hundred of times.

    2. If was done by ONE member of the LUF - not the Liberal Party - LUF is the youth organisations associated with the Liberal Party.

    3. He did it by trying to login using the same password as the username and other simple methods - and cracked 3 accounts. Socialist party had not a very secure system.

    4. The journalist claims ha was approached by a member of the liberal party who showed him how to accces the webbsite on a cyber cafe. That member claimed that many within the Liberal party know about it. Even though as far is known only 1(one) person did know about it.

    5. The journalist was/is a active member of the Socialist party youth section.

    6. The socialist party has know about this break-in for some time.

    7. The disclosure was made the same night as the major candidate to take over as prime minister was on TV being questioned - the leader of the Moderate party. (swedish right wing - but more like US democrats)

    9. The Socialistic party has before had an politician send emails pretending to be the Moderate party leader to journalists - trying to make it sound like the party leader was an idiot - and the socialist party member got fired in a scandal.

    There is an election this month in Sweden. The alleged crime was committed last year and until mars this year but not publicly known until now just before the election.

    You take your pick of who has done most to use this to win the election.

    --
    Just saying it like it are.
    1. Re:Many misleading statements by ziggamon2.0 · · Score: 1

      You forgot the best part:

      The "break in" was basically the use of a username and password they had gotten from one of the Socialist Democrat employees... Not the 1337-ass hacking one might expect!

    2. Re:Many misleading statements by portmapper · · Score: 1

      > The "break in" was basically the use of a username and password they had gotten from one of
      > the Socialist Democrat employees... Not the 1337-ass hacking one might expect!

      Social engineering is a very well known way to hack into a system. Of course, this
      type of attack is beyond the average script kiddie that barely is able to download
      a script they don't understand.

    3. Re:Many misleading statements by Ibn+al-Hazardous · · Score: 1

      Try again:

      There are two people who have confessed, so far.

      Both of them belong to the youth organization, one of them is press secretary on the national level. In Sweden the youth organizations play an important role in the election campaign, and "youth" is anyone under 40. This guy works close to the party leader, and even closer to other minister wannabies.

      The logins were made from one IP, which can be tied to this guy, 84 times until March. They continued after that, but not from tracable IPs (so the guy was no genius, but may have smarted up).

      This has been covered by more than one journalist. It's making the rounds in all Swedish media, and the police is making an investigation (using the Pirate Bay method - taking every computer they suspect might has MSNed the ones affected, or something on that order).

      The stuff that he got was campaign planning stuff, so he had a clue what would come up in advance. Does a press secretary benefit from this? Hell yes!

      In general, the public is getting tired of stuff like this. It'll probably affect all parties badly, not just the Liberals.

      PS I sympathize with neither party.

      --
      Yes, I am a biological organism. All rumors to the contrary are just that, rumors.
    4. Re:Many misleading statements by portmapper · · Score: 1

      You sound like a script kiddie trying to rationalize his actions.

      The fact is that an _employee_ of a party (Folkpartiet) hacked into their
      _political opponents_ networks to spy upon them, and that was done many times
      over several months.

      Your comments about "misleading statements" are nothing but a deception to draw
      the attention away from the above fact and start slandering the reporter.

    5. Re:Many misleading statements by Alef · · Score: 1
      3. He did it by trying to login using the same password as the username and other simple methods - and cracked 3 accounts. Socialist party had not a very secure system.

      Indeed. But how is that relevant? Is breaking and entering less of a crime if the key was found under the door mat?

    6. Re:Many misleading statements by Alef · · Score: 1
      9. The Socialistic party has before had an politician send emails pretending to be the Moderate party leader to journalists

      I believe this information is incorrect. The emailer in question did not impersonate the moderate party leader. He emailed anonymous slander to journalists.

      Not that I care too much, but since you titled your post "Many misleading statements" and did get "5 Informative" for it...

    7. Re:Many misleading statements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is breaking and entering less of a crime if the key was found under the door mat?

      According to my insurance company, hell yes!

  11. Election time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of you who don't know this, there's election in two weeks time.
    It took them 7 months to discover this, and it just happened to find evidence two weeks before election :)

  12. Time for some OpenBSD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a perfect time for Social Democratic Party to transition their network to OpenBSD. As we all know, OpenBSD offers by far what is the best security for its cost. A properly updated OpenBSD system will often drop the chance of a network intrusion to basically zero.

    Various other security mechanisms are provided to help ensure secure a secure system. User passwords, for example, are strenuously checked to make sure that they are of a suitable quality. The stack smashing prevention capabilities of their version of GCC provides protection (in addition to that of hardware-based protection) for stack overflows. They have their own fork of Apache, which has been thoroughly audited for security flaws.

    Anybody with sensitive information, especially a political party, needs to be using software that does its best to maximize their system security. Thankfully, OpenBSD makes that perfectly possible, at a very affordable price. It's no doubt that a donation from such a political party, were it to use the software, would lead to further improvements of the already superb quality of the security of OpenBSD.

    1. Re:Time for some OpenBSD. by dasOp · · Score: 1

      Cause we all know OpenBSD will stop people from using their username as a password on a middleware system.

      Oh, wait, just another case of keyboard before brain.

  13. Re:Typical behavior for liberals by masklinn · · Score: 1

    yeah except that in the case "liberals" are the most right-wing, they'd be equivalent to US' GOP, except that Sweden's politics (and all of Europe's politics in fact) have a gravity center much farther "left" than the US'.

    Oh wait, maybe that was your point?

    --
    "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  14. New editor! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Hooray!

  15. Oops, sorry - NOT a dupe by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I saw this thread's title "Sweden's Watergate" right after reading "Debian Kicks Jörg Schilling"; so I naturally assumed it was a dupe.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Oops, sorry - NOT a dupe by Brobock · · Score: 1

      I saw this thread's title "Sweden's Watergate" right after reading "Debian Kicks Jörg Schilling"; so I naturally assumed it was a dupe.

      And you did this when "Jörg Schilling" isn't even a Swedish name. What the hell they are all the same right?

  16. Re:PW = dictionary = ok? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    Of course not. But the order of the offense is even below viewing a porn site with borrowed passwords, on the level of viewing a link to a misconfigured site showing not-to-be-public-but-still-out-there material.

    It is not a hack attack and most certainly not a -gate scandal.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  17. Well, that is not exactly true... by Mindjiver · · Score: 5, Informative

    The largest party in sweden would be the social democrats, the second largest party are Moderaterna, the liberal party would be the third largest. And your placement of the parties on an american left-right-scale is not entirely true either.

    - Social Democrates, pragmatic power party with an emphasis on a large welfare state and a regulated labour market.
    - Moderates, previously somewhat conservative that now have triangulated the social democrates more or less totally.
    - Peoples Party - Liberals, Social-liberal party that now could be placed to the right of the moderates.

    Since there are seven major parties in sweden instead of two large coalitions like in the United States I find it hard to compare them to either the democrats or the republicans. For example it is hard to find any great amount protectionism in any of the parties platforms, but all favour a welfare state with socialized medicine for example. So you are over-simplifying things a bit too much! :)

    --
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
    1. Re:Well, that is not exactly true... by the-intersocialist · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason why you cannot compare the parties in Sweden with the Democrats and the Republicans is that the social democrats is a party of the workers movement (their name is actually "the workers party social democrats"). The basis of the social democratic party is in the peoples movements (tennants associations, tradeunions, cooperative enterprises, temperance movement, student unions, the peoples education movement, etc.), which consists of millions of people and are controlled by the social democrats (the social democrats themselves has 150 000 members, which is much compared to the other parties but small compared to what they used to be). For this reason, the division in Sweden is not between the liberal and the conservative but between the bourgeois and the workers parties. Bourgeios (Swedish "borgerlig") is a strange word in English, but in Swedish it what the right-wing parties call themselves. In the US there are only bourgeios parties, with very limited base in mass movements and very limited activities outside of the parliamentary context.

    2. Re:Well, that is not exactly true... by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      My fellow parent swede is obviously correct, there is no direct correlation to the Rep's and the Dem's of the United States, mostly because the entire swedish political spectrum is shifted very much to the left. However, to clarify for our american friends, there are indeed two political "blocks", the red parties (the lefties) and the blue parties (the righties, that is the colours are reversed compared to in the states). The left consists of the Social Democrats, the Left-party and the Environmental (green) party. The right consists of the Moderates, the Peoples-party (the liberals), the Center party and the Christian Democrats. While there are indeed alot of differences between the parties in the respective blocks, when the it comes down to brass-tax, that's how the parties are going to ally themselves. Either the three-party left coalition wins (in which case the Social Democrats control the executive branch), or the four-party right coalition wins (in which case the Moderats control the executive branch). So while not as clear, there is certainly a two-side dichotomy to swedish politics, just like in american politics.

    3. Re:Well, that is not exactly true... by SirBruce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The association of Red=Republican and Blue=Democrat in the states is actually a rather recent development. In the past, different media organizations used red and blue as they saw fit; quite often, they were swapped. Only with the Bush/Gore race in 2000 and the phrase "Red State America" has the color association become standardized.

      Bruce

    4. Re:Well, that is not exactly true... by siderespector · · Score: 1
      SirBruce said:
      The association of Red=Republican and Blue=Democrat in the states is actually a rather recent development.

      Wow, that's odd! Since Swedes would associate Dark-blue=Republican and Some-kind-of-pinkish=Democrat.

      --
      -- RVRSVS SIDERESPECTOR DIXIT
  18. oblig by nih · · Score: 1

    it was probably a møøse!

    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
  19. Noone cares by Caine · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seriously, this is not that big of a deal. Not that many people in Sweden cares. One of the major newspaper did a survey and over 70% of the people said they either did not care or that it didn't change what they would vote for.

    1. Re:Noone cares by mntdewdan · · Score: 1

      If 30% care or change in any electorate is a huge deal! Since Sweden is proportional voting, and if you look at the wikipedia numbers it appears they have 144 seats of 349. They only need another 31 seats to have the majority, and 31 seats is only 9% of the electorate, it appears that it is possible that a 30% swing has the potential to pick up enough seats to get a majority.

    2. Re:Noone cares by Hast · · Score: 1

      And to be quite frank. I don't consider "Expressen" a newspaper. They represent the "Fox News" of Swedish papers, although without the political bias. (They are not so much biased as fucking stupid.)

      They are more concerned about which wannabe star got drunk in a pub for other sad wannabes than actual news. It's sad really, it used to be a world-class photojournalism paper.

  20. Re:PW = dictionary = ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Re: ..snip.. misconfigured site showing not-to-be-public-but-still-out-there material.


    This sounds more like insider trading . . . Using timely insider knowledge to gain an advantage in the (political) marketplace. Just because the password is dictionary, doesn't make it legal.

  21. Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the news:
    "The password was the same as the username.. and the password was [removed by me]."

    Sometimes one wounders why they broadcast these things.
    The password has probely been changed already, but anyhow.
    Last week they showed how to open a normal door lock, and said what the tool was called and that all information could be found on the net.. took me 5minutes to find a PDF describing how to breakin to maybe 75% of all locks we got here..

    Door lock security might be one thing, but when they broadcast how to break into them on public TV.. And releave passwords on national TV... Then I as an IT Administrator realy wonder, if my lusers will ever learn not to install spywares on thier laptops as work.. Oh my god.

  22. Re:Typical behavior for liberals by portmapper · · Score: 1

    > yeah except that in the case "liberals" are the most right-wing, they'd be equivalent to US'
    > GOP, except that Sweden's politics (and all of Europe's politics in fact) have a gravity
    > center much farther "left" than the US'.

    In USA, anything to the left of Atila the Hun is a raving liberal ;-)

  23. The social democrats have their own black marks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=1042&a=52 4163&previousRenderType=6
    (Swedish)

    Translated loosely:

    In October the unemployed single mother "Alice" sent a tearfilled mail to several journalists at Today's News.
    The sender claims to be an unemployed, ill single mother who is despairing over the Moderates' suggestion to lower the unemployment benefit.
    She also describes a female friend 'whom I got to know at the employment agency was crying the other day and wondered if life was worth living if she receives more kicks like this in the future', and offered to be in a feature interview.

    - How can Reinfeld be so heartless? wondered "Alice".

    According to the newspaper the same IP address has also been used by "the freelance journalist Erik Persson who claims that Swedish journalists are bought out by the moderates, and by "Anna", an 'infuriated Stockholm woman' who accuses the Moderates of dubious polling methods.

    Aftonbladet states that the messages have been traced to an IP address at Sveavegen 68 in Stockholm, the Social Democrats' head office.

    --

    The electronic war has already started. Why play-act surprised that both sides take part?

    I also find the timing of this 'discovery' not surprising.

  24. Bad Joke Thread by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hee bor shteer, bom bor shteer doo,
    A dish-pi-doo.
    Bor bor shteer, lum bor shteer doo,
    Bork! Bork! Bork!

    Shteer!

    Sheeba shleeba goo, dish mooga hacken PC. Ung gish libo hacken PC, mish gee looder bouffer ooverfloo. Gee pish der bouffer ooverfloo mish der leety scripty in der shellcode mik joo inken Intel assoumbler. Fish, ung gish leeber scannen porten mooga funky nmap, bish der open port shif lish der foorwoll. Dish skel loder mish der leety scripty, spur gifor der bouffer ooverfloo, ung desh ooger morgen der stackenschmoosher! Ung gesh, mooga dish spur lorger hacken PC!

    1. Re:Bad Joke Thread by tinkerton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not bad enough I'm afraid :)

    2. Re:Bad Joke Thread by diffuze · · Score: 1

      *LMAO* Oh please mod the parent up!!
      I'm laughing so the tears flood the keyboard here..!

      "Fish, ung gish leeber scannen porten mooga funky nmap, bish der open port shif lish der foorwoll."

      A fresh mix between a drunk dutch, the swedish chef and Jar-Jar.

    3. Re:Bad Joke Thread by ettlz · · Score: 1
      A fresh mix between a drunk dutch, the swedish chef and Jar-Jar.

      That's fightin' talk!

    4. Re:Bad Joke Thread by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Why do I suddenly feel like going shopping at IKEA?

  25. Well-timed coincidences and political overload by piotrr · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sweden is three weeks from a election. It's a time when every newspaper and every TV channel cover the election in some form and where several hundred candidates for various positions make plays for attention every single day. There are currently seven major parties competing for press and at any one time, two of them will most definatly be talking about the same thing. This is normally called a debate or argument or conflicting standpoints or a "talkie" or what-have-you.

    The Swedish Liberal party (Folkpartiet) are focusing a very large part of their political campaign towards integration (of immigrants) and school issues. They bring it up every other day, or more often. The Swedish Social Democratic party (Socialdemokraterna) Party are in a defending position and vie for media attention every single day. They don't always discuss school or integration issues, but often enough. To say, as the Dagens Industri ("Industry Today") article does, that it is some sort of conspiracy if the Liberal Party happen to speak on school or integration issues on the same day that the Socialist party do, is an extremely peculiar accusation. If you look for a pattern, you will see that pattern everywhere in nature.

    As for the timing of this news release. The Socialist party was informed by Dagens Industri this last Tuesday that the incursions were taking place. Yet the Socialist Party chose to hold public release of this news until yesterday evening, the same evening when Fredrik Reinfelt, leader of the largest party in opposition, the Moderates, was the subject of hearing in public television. Yet more election propaganda, of course, but covered by and questions asked by public service TV journalists.

    If you want to talk about coincidences, you might want to look back at the television hearing a few weeks ago when the party Christian Democrat leader was heard in the same show. Before the political analysis of the questions and answers he had given could ever reach the press, the Social Democratic party just happen to "discover" that a (young, again) member of the Christian Democratic party had "spied" on the Social Democratic party. How had she performed this espionage, you ask. Had she hacked the Social Democratic database? Had she broken into the Party headquarters? Or had she perhaps made a single phone call to the Social Democratic election strategy center? Take your pick.

    As far as I can smell, there's something fishy about the way information keeps popping out of the Social Democratic headquarters at extremely opportune times. They don't participate in the resulting ruckus, but they do choose when it should be started. Something smells fishy, and it's not my caviar that's doing it.

    --
    / Per
  26. Translation of story by gkearney · · Score: 1

    February 17 Minister for Schools and Adult Education Ibrahim Baylan released the report "Ten myths about the Swedish school". The same day Jan Björklund, the Swedish Liberal Party's education spokeman counterattacked, with the report "Ten truths about the school".

    According to today's industry willed Baylan placed forward a report about the school during the weekend as gone. Last Saturday the done party leader Lars Leijonborg and Minister for Schools and Adult Education challenging clean Jan Björklund an initiative about order in the school.

    Ministers Jens Orback and Mona Sahlin presented last Friday a report "Sweden will at last a stem time country on the integration area". The Swedish Liberal Party came with a reply that same day, in the form of a statement of integration spokeman Mauricio Rojas and two reports writen by the Member of Parliament.

    But both party press spokeman Johan Jakobsson and party leader Lars Leijonborg rejects all rumours about the use of internal information in order to plan initiatives in the campaign.

    - I have looked the through initiatives and can not find any connections, the is clean chances, says Lars Laijonborg.

    He may medhåll of your partisekreterare
    - we do test initiatives each day so the is a clean coincidence, orders Johan Jakobsson SvD.se.

  27. I don't worship Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Europe, taken at large, is not a place I'd want to live. As you point out, it's just as corrupt as we ever thought of being. Of course there are a lot of countries in Europe and they're all different.

    I have a lot of respect for the Swedes. My experience is a bit out of date maybe but I always found them to be honest and fair (and even more boring than Canadians). I would be saddened to think their politicians had stooped as low as Nixon.

  28. Re:PW = dictionary = ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying "HA HA his password was in the dictionary" doesn't make it ok.

  29. Phone number is 978-449-0444. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Poor fella forgot to remove his contact info, phone and address before posting: http://technologyfront.com/contact.html

    Keith Dawson is the principal of the Technology Front. Here is a little of my background, with links to more.

    I work out of my home office at 118-A Hollis Street in Groton, Massachusetts 01450 (map).

    Phone number is 978-449-0444.

    Maybe that will prevent dupes. ;)

  30. Has to be said... by Cally · · Score: 0

    b0rk! b0rk! b0rk!!

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  31. I can guarantee remote security on any system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have another server that is not connected to the internet. Seriously they aren't that expensive.

  32. Won't happen here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something like this would have serious consequences if it was tried here. The president would resign in disgrace... or at least those responsible would be held accountable. Nope, we got memogate when republicans broke in to democratic computers to read strategy documents.

    1. Re:Won't happen here by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      when republicans broke in to democratic computers to read strategy documents.

      'broke in' == 'accessed unsecured server'

      Also note the files downloaded were embarrassing to the democrates, revealing the depths of their cynicism to the press. Calling it hacking was a distraction which the partisanly liberal elements of the American press were happy to latch onto (and hence ignore the content the democrates had 'chosen to share').

      The whole story makes an excellent litmus test for your media sources. Biased left or right. I've yet to see balanced reporting on that one.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Won't happen here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I presume you nean 'Fair and Balanced'(TM) (AnyAndAllOtherMarksIncludedMark)

  33. Sweden's Watergate? Then we can expect... by gilroy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... in twenty-ish years, the people disgraced and chastened here will -- having nursed the interpretation that they were betrayed by democracy -- worm their way back into power, un-do any reforms that this sparks, and then lead Sweden into a disastrous war of choice under false pretenses lobbed against an isolated tinhorn dictator who was not not complicit in a major terrorist attack on their country. Bonus points if the tinhorn dictator happens to have been immplicated in a bizarre plot to assasinate the Prime Minister's father right after the father himself stepped down from the PM-ship.

  34. A bit OT, but since we're on the Swedish elections by Zarhan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...how is the Pirate Party (www.piratpartiet.se) coming out in the polls recently? Any swedes who could tell us?

  35. Social engineering is the best way to hack... by DaveRexel · · Score: 1

    Think about it, just one bored and lonely office worker of indiscriminate sex to charm, no messy hacking about that can leave indelible digital traces :D

    Warning to the feeble-minded : "Do not attempt this on your bored and lonely office worker of indiscriminate sex"

    Thank you for your kind attention, please complete the following form to confirm your intelligence is above average.

    http://www.click.here.to.assert/your.intelligence

    --
    # ~: no sigs today
  36. Yet another by Ricken · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason to vote for Piratpartiet!
    hands up!

  37. CBS News video report on Watergate by ewg · · Score: 1

    CBS News report on Watergate from 1972-06-19.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=I28mQEVJQso

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  38. Re:Typical behavior for liberals by The_Hun · · Score: 1

    Depends on which side I turn to the USA with.

    Oh BTW (if anyone still reads) who are liberal-conservatives then?

    -------Attila the Late

    --
    Sig. under reconstruction.
  39. What's scary... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    What's scary isn't that someone now identified managed to enter their internal network containing very sensitive information from the Swedish security police about politican protection, but that said network had a user with maximum privilegies with his password the same as his username... :-p And it was not changed at a minimum for a half year period. The socialist party shouldn't just worry about this now -- at least the liberal youth party has come forward with this and the person is now identified -- but they should rather be worried if anyone with more malicious purposes than peeking into their scheduled political events have got hold of this information with that horrible security. Better start checking the audit logs of the past few years, guys. :-p

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  40. America's Watergate 2004 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Republican Senate staff cracked into the Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats' mail server, spying on hundreds of memos focusing on the Democrats' strategy to respond to Bush's nominee judges, including Supreme Court Justices. But somehow that hasn't triggered another Watergate in America's Republican Congress.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      why oh why does that watergrate seem soo incredibly boring when compared to a real live break in...

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    2. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget the Democrat's Watergate in 2005:

      "Two opposition researchers working for Sen. Charles Schumer at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee obtained copies of a confidential credit report on Maryland's Republican lieutenant governor, prompting calls for their prosecution."

      --from Newsday

    3. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Comparing a couple of researchers buying copies of a confidential credit report on a MD Lt Governor to senate staff hacking the Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats mail server for over a year, spying on the strategy to oppose Bush's judge nominee (including the Supreme Court), is like comparing lying about a blowjob to lying us into Iraq. If you insist, we should agree to impeach Bush.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      Nice jab, but I don't buy into your moral relativism. A crime is a crime and we should not put up with any of it. As for Bush lying to get us into war, you are lying to me about that. 12+ U.N. resolutions weren't enough for you week, feeble minded liberals. If he had no WMDs, why was the U.N. even bothering to pass resolution after resolution? Why was the U.N. sending in inspectors? Obviously the world thought he had WMDs. Either way, I'm glad moral relativists like you are not in charge. Our country would be as corrupt as Mexico.

    5. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "Moral relativism"? Even Jesus thought murder was worse than lying, and anyone who doesn't worship Bush would agree that lying us into war is worse than lying about a blowjob.

      There were no WMD. And those inspectors you have the gall to mention also said there were no WMD.

      But "morality" is your virgin priest's business. The legal penalty for lying about a blowjob is... acquittal in the Senate. The legal penalty for lying us into invading Iraq is... nothing, when Republicans run Congress.

      You people are disgusting, and you're all going to hell. And I don't mean just the "war is hell" hell, either.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
            - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

      "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
            - President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

      "We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
            - Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

      "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
            - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

        "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
            - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

      It is one thing to lie about sex in front of your wife, it is quite another to do it in front of a Judge or Grand Jury. But Liberals such as yourself have lied repeatedly about this "Bush Lied" thing, and you seem to not have a problem with it.

    7. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      If I wanted to play your game, I'd cut through your lies by saying that neither Clinton nor Kerry invaded Iraq. And even though I haven't said anything about Kerry, he was one of the people who Bush lied in the most seriously wrong way. Bush lied to Congress, which is an impeachable offense. And invaded Iraq on those lies. Even a Republican Senate didn't find Clinton guilty of lying about a blowjob.

      And don't give me any of that crap about "Bush had bad intelligence" (unless you mean "Bush is stupid"). No one believes that BS. Everyone knows that Bush and Cheney made up the intelligence to get the Iraq War they always wanted. And now we're stuck with it. And we're stuck with losers like you calling people "Liberal" as if it were a bad word, or as if it were true, or even meant anything. Republican loser people like you who respond to talk about Bush's catastrophes with "But Clinton...". You are the sissiest political monsters ever, and only you diehard Bush worshippers even repeat that BS anymore. Save it for your concession speeches.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      If I wanted to play your game, I'd cut through your lies by saying that neither Clinton nor Kerry invaded Iraq.

      Now you change your charge to "but they didn't invade Iraq based on THEIR lies." Nice. So the Clinton admin was lying, John Kerry was lying, German intelligence was lying, the U.N. was passing resolutions and sending in inspectors for no reason, Newspapers and Policy institutions were lying, and of course Bush is the smartest person in the world "in this one instance" because he was able to hide the truth from everyone!

      For the record, the senate *did* find Clinton guilty of lying, they just didn't remove him from office over it. But while we are on the subject of Congress, why did the Democrats vote for the war in Iraq? Were they duped by this "all of the sudden intelligent" Bush? You mean they didn't listen to Clinton and Albright? You mean they didn't see the inspectors being kicked out by Saddam time and time again? They were all duped, right? Keep on lying...

      Here is a snippet from "Washington Institute for Near East Policy" when Bush first took office:

      "
        IRAQ'S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (WMD): AN EMERGING CHALLENGE FOR THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION

      By Michael Eisenstadt
      Washington Institute for Near East Policy
      POLICYWATCH, NO. 515
      29 January 2001

      Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) are emerging as one of the first major foreign policy challenges of the Bush administration. Free of weapons monitors and with sanctions eroding, Iraq has resumed its aggressive policies. After the start of the al-Aqsa Intifada last September, it briefly moved elements of four to five divisions toward its border with Syria in a show of solidarity, and on several occasions since then, Saddam Husayn has threatened to destroy Israel. Then, earlier this month, his older son Uday reasserted Iraq's claim to Kuwait. With its conventional military capabilities hobbled by two bloody wars and more than a decade of sanctions, Iraq's retained WMD capabilities assume renewed salience.
      "

      From: http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/winep-policy wtch515-1-29-01.htm

    9. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I didn't say "but they didn't invade Iraq based on THEIR lies", I said they didn't invade Iraq. And their words said they were busy stopping Saddam from getting WMD, to which effect Clinton ran an air war against Saddam through the decade which stopped him without invading.

      My charge was that Bush lied us into invading Iraq. Spin that however you want, your boy lied us into Iraq.

      Where's the WMD?

      And as long as you're going to fly all over the map with your strawmen and lies, WHERE'S OSAMA?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      And their words said they were busy stopping Saddam from getting WMD, to which effect Clinton ran an air war against Saddam through the decade which stopped him without invading.

      Your theory does not hold water. 1. The Dems voted for the War. 2. Even John Kerry said he would have voted for the war "knowing now what he knew then" during the 2004 campaign. 3. Even after Clinton left office, Democrats (even Hillary) were saying:

        "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
            - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

      "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
            - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

      "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
            - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

      "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
            - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

      "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
            - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

      Keep spreading lies, after all "the ends justifies the means" right? Power at all costs, right? Socialism and humanistic secularism at any cost right?

    11. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yap yap yap.

      I'm secular all right.

      And YOU ARE GOING STRAIGHT TO HELL. You can argue about it with Saddam forever.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about time you admitted defeat, you whiny liberal.

    13. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Why, Anonymous fascist Coward, because you fascist Republicans can't pretend you're anything but failures for much longer?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:America's Watergate 2004 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
          100% Offtopic

      TrollMods think repeating Watergate in DC is offtopic to repeating it in Sweden.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  41. Re:A bit OT, but since we're on the Swedish electi by gkhan1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    While I haven't seen any recent polls on them specifically, they will almost certainly have no impact whatsoever. To get a seat in parliament, you need atleast 4% of the popular vote (this is to weed out small, very fringe parties, such as nazis and pirates ;) and in the last election, around 5.3 million people voted. 4% of 5.3 million is 212000 votes. They have no chance in hell of getting that many.

    Much more interesting are two other tiny parties, FI (feministic initiative) and a party that's called the June-list. The first one was formed as a response to a percieved lack of feministic issues being discussed in the national theatre (I'm a rabid feminist, it's an extremely important issue for me, but unfortunatly, the leaders if FI are, well, insane). The second one, Juni-listan (the June-list), was a party that was formed at the last swedish referendum (whether we should join the European Monatery Union and start using the Euro) as a rabid anti-EU party. Both are now trying to get into the parliament. It will be interesting to see what happens with them, but the Pirate Party has unfortunatly no chance of getting any seats. I mean, even I, a slashdotter who takes the copyright issue seriously, won't vote for them. I'm sorry, but there is too much at stake in this election.

  42. this is all very interesting and fascinating but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... where is Sweden? :-/

  43. It happened in the US, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  44. So you just had to double the amount? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    1, 84 times not hundred of times.

    Wrong. Actually, most news sources says it was 78 times during january, february and march. They also say there were more logins than those 78. Anyway, how would you know the exact amount?

    2. If was done by ONE member of the LUF - not the Liberal Party - LUF is the youth organisations associated with the Liberal Party.

    Wrong. As of now, two people in LUF has already confessed involvement, and the newspaper Dagens Industri says they'll name another person involved tomorrow, and that she's in the innermost circle of the Liberal Party. And there's more! Several members of the liberal party actually tried to log on with their own names(!)

    3. He did it by trying to login using the same password as the username and other simple methods - and cracked 3 accounts. Socialist party had not a very secure system.

    Wrong. No claim has been made to an attack like the one describe.

    Instead, the local social-democratic department in question uses a wireless network, and a representative said someone probably sniffed it. The Liberal Party claims a member of the social-democratic youth organization gave them the passwords.

    Either way, it's true that using passwords like that is insecure. But it's even more true that taking advantage of it like these liberals did is unethical. I'd prefer someone technically-impaired before someone ethically-impaired any day.

    4. The journalist claims ha was approached by a member of the liberal party who showed him how to accces the webbsite on a cyber cafe. That member claimed that many within the Liberal party know about it. Even though as far is known only 1(one) person did know about it.

    Wrong. See 2. And it isn't a website, it's a FirstClass system.

    5. The journalist was/is a active member of the Socialist party youth section.

    I admit this is worth mentioning if it is true. I've followed this thing quite closely though and you're the first to claim it. This wouldn't surprise me, but considering the rest of your post consisting mostly of unique claims and biased nonsense, I wouldn't trust you for anything.

    6. The socialist party has know about this break-in for some time.

    Partly true. They say they've suspected it for some time. They hired an investigator (Sentor) wednesday last week, the investigation was finished sunday afternoon, and they held the press conference a few hours later, at midnight.

    7. The disclosure was made the same night as the major candidate to take over as prime minister was on TV being questioned - the leader of the Moderate party. (swedish right wing - but more like US democrats)

    True, but pointless. The election is the 17th, not the 7th. If they wanted it to have the biggest possible impact, one would think they'd keep it a secret for more than just a few hours. That way they could've dropped the bomb much closer to the election. Now, it might just as well hurt the social-democratic party, because of exactly the point you're trying to make -- people will think that they're just taking advantage of this to win the election. This is probably why they chose not to "come to any political conclusions from this, but wait for the police investigation to finish". And at least this first day, the only parties to speak out on the matter has been the Liberals and the Conservatives ("Moderates"). The social democrats seem wise enough to shut up and let people think for themselves, for once.

    (btw, what happened to 8? you got that one before me?)

    9. The Socialistic party has before had an politician send emails pretending to be the Moderate party leader to journalists - trying to make it sound like the party leader was an idiot - and the socialist party member got fired in a scandal.

    -1 Off-topic. So what? If you're going to try to change the outcome of the Swedish election

  45. Re:You are absolutely wrong!!!! by LOADLETTER · · Score: 0

    Liberals in Sweden are exactly liberals in US. The difference is that the "left wing" would be left wing extremists and non existing in US.

  46. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  47. Re:A bit OT, but since we're on the Swedish electi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, even I, a slashdotter who takes the copyright issue seriously, won't vote for them. I'm sorry, but there is too much at stake in this election.

    You may not, but I will, so if you think you represent the majority then you might be dreaming in technicolor my friend. I'm not very political, and really don't give a shit about politics unless it concerns me directly in some way. Many of my friends are also not political (hey, they barely even vote) and they all know about the Pirate Party. I've never heard of FI and Juni-listan until now so I doubt they'll make an impact, but just about everyone who owns a computer in Sweden knows about the Pirate Party - thanks to the recent Pirate Bay scandal. Hell, I think many are going to vote on the Pirate Party in protest or just for the fun of it.

    I know I would.

    Now, I don't have a vote in the national election and can only vote in local elections (i.e. "kommun valet"), but if I had a vote, then Pirate Party would get it because we really need a patent/copyright reform before things get out of hand like in the U.S. In addition to patent/copyright reform, the Pirate Party represents the CowboyNeal option of a Slashdot poll.

    I'm not saying I'm right and you're wrong, I'm just saying you might be surprised.

  48. Well, from what the article suggests... by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...a Swedish Liberal is more like a Canadian Liberal, which is to say that a Liberal doesn't really have any concrete principles except to say and do whatever might help them achieve and maintain power ;-)

    As others have observerd here, politics outside the US is far more complicated than "left and right" (hell, even US politics has more dimension than that, though the fact that only two parties have power simplifies things). Even the Canadian landscape is far different politically and in some ways mirrors the Swedish situation. For those non-Canadian readers:

    Canada's federal parliament has 4 official parties, which dont exactly fall evenly on a political left-right spectrum...cynically, they are:

    1. The Conservative party currently leads a minority government (largest portion of the commons but still less than 50%). It is also the youngest federal party in Canada (it has only ran in two elections--2004 and 2006). It came into being largely because of a coalition of some disaffected MPs from two now-defunct right-of-centre parties (The Alliance and Progressive-Conservatives/PCs). This un-official coalition ended when the Alliance chose a new leader (the current Prime Minister), and a formal merger was achieved not long after the PCs chose their new leader (now deputy leader of the Conservatives and current Foreign Affairs minister). Because of this heritage, the Conservative party is a fairly mixed-bag of vaguely right-wing principles. The Alliance generally represented the "far right" (equivalent to moderate US Republicans) though in acutality it was an almost evenly-split coalition of populitsts, social conservatives and libertarians. The Progressive-Conservatives (which sounds like an oxymoron to many people) were nominally right-of-centre in that they were socially "progressive" (protect socialised medicine, support gay marriage, strong central government) but economically conservative (scrap costly gun control, support free trade, outlaw deficits...).

    Despite PM Harper being described by his critics on the left as "shrub" or "George's puppet" or other such nasty ways, suggesting that he and his party are nothing more than far-right republicans, Harper himself is acually from the libertarian faction of this large "right wing" coalition. Though he is a regular church-goer he is loathe to legislate morality and evasive on subject such as gay marriage (he'd generally prefer to defer such moral decisions to free votes in Parliament). This lets him get out of having to put the coalition in jeopardy by angering the social conservative support base and appeals to the populist demand for more direct democracy.

    Disappointingly to most Conservative supporters the party is viewed as the "least bad" of all the parties. Populists want more action on democratic reform and more openness in goverment than we've been getting recently. Social conservatives would like more vocal defence of thier values by their learder and MPs (which would probably scare off most Conservative support realistically). Libertarians are frustrated at pledging support for large government programmes like mandatory universal healthcare. The one thing that truly unites this party is economic conservatism, and it support is not realy solid--it retains its support basically because it has acutally kept most of its election promises. A study was recently done and quite literally it is the first government that has kept more than half its election promises since, like world war II.

    2. The Liberal Party is the official opposition though it has held power for most of Canada's history as a nation. It, well, stands for nothing in particular. Ironically the Liberal's are probably best described as "classiclally conservative" as they support (or at least pay lip service to) "traditional Canadian values". These values are not "bic C" Conservative (what we'd call right wing), but it does fall under the definition of a "classic conservative" (which is to day, they advocate the preservation of

    1. Re:Well, from what the article suggests... by makomk · · Score: 1

      ...a Swedish Liberal is more like a Canadian Liberal, which is to say that a Liberal doesn't really have any concrete principles except to say and do whatever might help them achieve and maintain power ;-)

      So, in other words you reckon they're like the British "New Labour"...

    2. Re:Well, from what the article suggests... by Pope · · Score: 1
      emoving the word "God" from our anthem

      I see nothing wrong with that, considering it wasn't even there until 1979 or so. We had a perfectly decent secular national anthem, and some idiots had to ruin it.
      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Well, from what the article suggests... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are blessed by having at least the illusion of a clear-cut choice between A and B

      The problem is that the vast majority of Americans really want a little from column A and a little from column B. Who wouldn't want a government that spends less and taxes less? Of course, the question really is "what programs to cut".

      For me, the problem is that as a fiscally conservative and socially liberal person, neither A nor B really has my vote. In America, the Libertarian Party almost gets it, but they seriously need to shake off the nutjobs that have latched on to the party and have been leeching it of its sanity before I can take them seriously.

    4. Re:Well, from what the article suggests... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      I see nothing wrong with that, considering it wasn't even there until 1979 or so.

      You obviously are ignorant of Canadian history. "O Canada", our current official national anthem, was originally written in French, and no less tha FOUR different English versions were in common use (dubbed the Richardson, McCulloh, Buchan and the Weir versions--named after the author of the lyrics for each). ALL but one--the popular Weir version--mentioned "God" at least once in the first verse, and even the Weir version mentioned God in the final verse.

      Furthermore, "O Canada" has only been the official national anthem since 1980, and the addition of the word "God" in the first verse coincided with its official adoption (this change in lyrics was strongly pushed by Trudeau and his newly re-elected Liberal government). The adoption of "O Canada" as our sole, official national anthem in 1980 was to signify the 100th anniversary of the original French version of the song. Prior to that Canada's official "Royal Anthem" was..."GOD save the Queen". "O Canada" was only a "national symbol" until 1966, when it became "the nation's anthem" (this mostly had to do with if the government held copyright and which lyrics were the official ones--God Save the Queen remained the "Royal" anthem and the only one required at official functions until 1980).

      We had a perfectly decent secular national anthem, and some idiots had to ruin it.

      Firstly, it is quite offensive to label those who defend the expression of faith in our anthem as "idiots". In making your statement, you have asserted that the biggest "idiot" of them all was none other than former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, as he was one of the chief proponents of the lyric changes (IIRC the now-official lyric changes are very closely based on Trudeau's personal suggestion).

      Second, Canada has NEVER in its history had a secular national anthem, decent or otherwise, official or otherwise. Our first national anthem has "God" right in the title and features God repeatedly in the lyrics. As for O Canada being secular, there has ALWAYS been reference to faith in BOTH the French and english versions of the song:

      Original French: ...Il sait porter la croix... (...it can bear the cross...) and also Et ta valeur, de foi trempée (with valour, full of faith)

      Richardson version: Almighty God! On thee we call / Defend our rights, forfend this nation's thrall

      McCulloch version: Lord God of Hosts! We now implore / Bless our dear land this day and evermore

      Buchan version: With hearts we sing, "God save the King"

      Weir version (fourth verse of the version on which our official anthem is based, which remains unchanged to this day): Help us to find, O God, in thee / A lasting, rich reward

      Careful about what names you throw around...they might bounce back and stick to you... ...idiot...

  49. Trivial Password by Pingo · · Score: 1

    From Swedish media it is evident that the Social democrats server was
    protected by username/password. In this case one of the persons with
    access to sensitive information had choosen password exactly equal to
    his username.

    In the corporate world this kind of passwords is a big no no and would
    be considerd reckless. The Swedish Social Democrats is now making a big
    deal out of an allmost criminal negligance by their own people.

    Could this be due to their unfavourable opinion polls close to the
    election on the 17th this month? //Pingo

    --
    --- Linux or FreeBSD, it's like blondes or brunettes. I like both. ---
  50. password = username = name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The password was the same as the username...

    Not only that. The username was his real name!

    Security?

  51. Re:A bit OT, but since we're on the Swedish electi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't agree with the Pirate Party that much, but I will vote for them in this election anyway. A copyright reform is badly needed, and only the Pirates can make that happend. I am not afraid that they will get too much influence in the national parliament.

  52. brass tacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also note that the expression is "brass tacks". Picture an upholstered couch, stripped down to to just the brass tacks.

  53. you forgot to finish the last sentence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at the expense of the people who actually work and do things on their own w/o waiting for the govt to spoonfeed them.

  54. Korea -- The Vanishing of Chinatown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Korea -- The Vanishing of Chinatown ("The Economist", 1996 August 3)

    FROM Manila to Saigon, Chinatowns are thriving in most East Asian cities. They are the creation of the waves of emigrants from mainland China who have moved all over the region, and shaped it with their energy and entrepeneurial zeal. But Seoul is an East Asian exception - its Chinatown vanished long ago. The reasons tell you something about the peculiar nature of South Korea.

    Until the early 1980s, a Chinatown could still be found in and around a district called Myong-dong. All that remains today is the Chinese embassy, a Chinese bookshop and a handful of Chinese restaurants - all but one of them run by Koreans. Even the Chinese bakeries that once thrived in the streets a little farther away at the back of the Seoul Plaza hotel have vanished. Instead Myong-dong now bustles with fashion shops, trendy bars and many other sorts of restaurants. The land the bakeries once stood on now sprouts corporate tower blocks.

    What happened? The answer seems to be that, like many a western businessman, the overseas Chinese found South Korea too tough a market to crack. That is a fairly remarkable, if dubious, tribute to South Korea, given the enormous difficulties the overseas Chinese have overcome elsewhere in the region.

    Many Chinese claim they were forced out by the Seoul authorities. The metropolitan government announced redevelopment plans in 1973 for part of Chinatown. In some areas, landowners were required to build high-rise buildings, but many Chinese were unable to finance such projects. Some sold out at below market rates and either went to Taiwan, emigrated to America (a large number settled in Los Angeles) or moved to other parts of Seoul.

    The Chinese-Koreans, however, were having a tough time long before then. Most arrived in the Korean peninsula from China in the 1940s as farmers, searching for fertile land. When the Communists took over in China, many stayed and acquired Taiwanese passports. By 1950, when the Korean war broke out, some 40,000 Chinese were living in Korea. Many were landowners and had established thriving businesses. By the 1960s, the number in South Korea had risen to about 50,000. Now there are barely 10,000.