FreeDOS 1.0 Released
Noksagt writes, "FreeDOS 1.0 has been released only a little bit later than planned. The 1.0 milestone is considered to be 'a stable and viable MS-DOS replacement' and features long filename support, HIMEM and EMM386 management, and CD-ROM support."
I liked DOS as much as anybody, but FreeDOS is perhaps 5 years too late for anyone to care.
Most people have now (FINALLY) moved entirely off DOS (even Microsoft!), which had a solid niche until a few years ago.
FreeDOS has really poor compatibility with everything I try. Try to run some MS-DOS program, and it aborts before showing anything, or perhaps acts in very weird ways, sometimes doing real damage.
The main thing I tried it for, quite recently, was partitioning/formatting, as Windows has a few limitations in that regard. After finishing the job, Windows couldn't even read the partion. FreeDOS is a LONG way from 100% compatible.
What's more, DR-DOS has been freely available, for a very long time now. You can even get the source code to it, if needed, although it's under a restrictive license. It really is 99% compatible with MS-DOS, both applications and filesystems.
What is anyone using FreeDOS for, today, other than bragging rights?
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
For examples of unsigned applications that doesn't break Aero: GAIM. Miranda. Firefox. VLC. We could go on and on.