Slashdot Mirror


Another 150,000 Years of CO2 Data

An anonymous reader writes, "We've known since 2004 that the past 440,000 years have shown atmospheric carbon dioxide levels varying between about 200 and 300 ppmv, the difference in extremes being the difference between advancing ice sheets and our current clime. In 2005 the data were analyzed back to 650,000 years and were found to be much the same — Al Gore was proud to be able to show that then-new analysis in his 2006 movie An Inconvenient Truth. Now all 800,000 years of the ice column have been analyzed, and the data show much the same pattern, according to the researcher: 'When carbon dioxide changed there was always an accompanying climate change. Over the last 200 years human activity has increased carbon dioxide to well outside the natural range' — to 380 ppmv."

2 of 809 comments (clear)

  1. I think what Al is really trying to say by Timesprout · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is that he invented the ice age

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  2. Re:An Inconvenient Agreement: Bill O'Reilly & by glider524 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Yes, I came across this in Wikipedia a while back: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine

    I believe this event helped to usher in a big long-term promotion wave of pro-business, pro-executive branch authoritarianism. The Fairness Doctrine falling was a fairly major contributor of a decades-long sea change in politics that started back in 1987. That's when Republicans got control of the committee overseeing the FCC and shut down the general rules on raw partisanship and personal attacks on political subjects in the media. I can't tell you how many people (like my dad, a few coworkers, etc.) have been directly peppered--and I would say slowly corrupted--with a drumbeat of Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck and Fox News types in the world. It used to be if you broadcast to millions, you sort of had to attempt to actually be "fair and balanced" (totally unlike what Fox News is). You had to let public figures have equal unobstructed time to respond when he was attacked and basically lied about. That was gone after the Fairness Doctrine was done away with. Colbert has is right.. now people who watch/listen to these shows become perpetually perturbed, fierce, angry, and brainwashed that the world has simple solutions. The simple solution being to have a strong leader who can make instant decisions based on convictions without a lot of 'endless' debate or fussy accountability.

    Offtopic I know, but here are some beefs with Fox and other conservatives that make me shake my head at the state of popular media in the country:
    1. They use hyperbolic, inflammatory commentary spoken by the actual news reporters as they read current events.
    2. Telling people what they want to hear. Basically the sentiment is, "If only all the stupid people would just get out of the way...". Feeds on people's daily sense of frustration.
    3. Straw-man argumentative premises. Supports calling domestic spying "Terrorist Surveillance", and tax cuts for the rich "Tax Relief".
    4. Fringe people are found and presented as examples of the Left's core beliefs.
    5. Sound-byte, meaningless stories are found and presented only to irritate and enflame (One headline story: "Men's group demanding right to not to have to support their biological children since women have right to abortions, claim it's not fair").
    6. Salacious news stories on murders, rapes, trials, celebrities, etc. Encourages an extremist-response view to crime ('kill them all, and let God sort them out' attitude).
    7. 'Expert' guests that are given softball questions to provide prepared, propagandistic answers to. Reminds me of a state sponsored speech in Soviet Russia. ("So, how do you think the President should cope with people who don't want to defend the country?")
    8. Over-simplification of most political, cultural, economic, civil liberty realities. Offers simplistic solutions which betray the political and cultural complexities about the subject in this country or the world. Truth is far more complex and consequences would be had by demagogs. (kill them all, nuke'em, let them starve, torture them all, etc.)
    9. Accusatory tone toward all the 'liberal biased media' of mainstream press, drumbeat of 'corrupt and spineless Democrats', etc.
    10. Outright partisan cheerleading for Republican party and Bush. Very excusatory of missteps and lack of wise strategic political judgment. Obviously questionably illegal programs (domestic wiretapping, phone record listings, financial record listings, torture, CIA identify revealing) are given a free pass.
    11. Misleading and missing facts in the story. Example: supports the claim that the President did brief congress on domestic wiretapping.
    12. Alarmist stories on possible terrorism. Example: FBI recently arrested some stooges down in Florida who were recorded taking a fake oath to Al-Qaeda administered by an undercover agent. They have no money, no