Supercomputer to Hit 1.6 Petaflops With 16,000 Cell Chips

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Supercomputer to Hit 1.6 Petaflops With 16,000 Cell Chips

Posted by ryuzaki0 on Thursday September 7, 2006 @05:50AM from the you-do-the-math dept.

tygerstripes writes, "IBM has announced that they are gearing up to build the world's fastest supercomputer, more than four times faster than the reigning champ, IBM's BlueGene/L. Nicknamed 'Roadrunner,' the new machine will be a hybrid of off-the-shelf CPUs and Cell chips designed for the PS3. Roadrunner is to be installed at Los Alamos National Laboratory, occupying 1,100 square metres of floorspace (that's a square about 110 feet on a side). According to the BBC: 'The computer will contain 16,000 standard processors working alongside 16,000 Cell processors... each Cell is capable of 256 billion calculations per second.'"

7 of 260 comments (clear)

Now... by ronadams · 2006-09-07 05:52 · Score: 5, Funny

OS/2 compiles your homemade C code faster than you've ever seen before!

--
Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
Whew, right under the wire! by BadAnalogyGuy · 2006-09-07 05:52 · Score: 5, Funny

Just in time for the Vista RC1 release!
Also building a slightly slower computer... by AceCaseOR · 2006-09-07 05:53 · Score: 4, Funny

IBM is also building a slightly slower computer, called "Wile E. Coyote", which is slightly slower. They are currently attempting to work out the bugs, as it keeps crashing...

--
Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
1. Re:Also building a slightly slower computer... by steveo777 · 2006-09-07 05:57 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  They're currently thumbing through ACME cataloges for spare rockets and rollerskate. That should speed things up.
  
  --
  This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
However part of the problem by OzPeter · 2006-09-07 06:00 · Score: 5, Funny

has been identifed as sub-standard components delivered by a third party company called "acme".

These components had a tendency to either explode at in-opportune moments, or behave in a manner that while was true to the letter of their description was totally ineffective for the desired purpose.

At the moment each side is gathering its hoards of lawyers and all involved are jumping up and down, waving thigh-bones in the air and screaming incomprehensible abuse at each other.

--
I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
1. Re:However part of the problem by reverseengineer · 2006-09-07 06:57 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  The unique failure modes of these Acme components, however, have caused IBM researchers to stumble upon a remarkable macroscale quantum effect which may be useful in the development ofquantum computers.
  Apparently, when the Acme Rocket Sled, Acme Giant Rubber Band or the Acme Bat-Man suit reach their point of failure, every particle of the unfortunate user is compelled into a quantum superposition (known as the Chuck Jones state) where the particles of the user appear to exist outside of the normal flow of time, during which the user can apparently communicate with the outside using messages written on signs. The wavefunction collapses, however when the user realizes the peril of the current situation; the user returns to normal time and is contacted catastrophically by the approaching train/TNT detonation/boulder/ground/ground followed by a pursuant boulder.
  IBM scientists believe that useful calculations could be made nearly instantaneously from the perspective of outside observers, if only the user inside the Jones state could be induced to work complex math problems and write the answer on a picket sign, rather than simply using such signs for messages like, "Why Me?", "Not Again!", "?!?!?!?!?!" or "Ouch."
  NASA is also working with Acme to determine the physical mechanism by which the Acme Portable Hole functions.
  
  --
  "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
Re:Billion or billion? by morgan_greywolf · 2006-09-07 06:11 · Score: 4, Funny

British 'billions' are American 'trillions'. So this may be running three orders of magnitude faster than you first expec

Yeah, go figure. Stupid Brits can't even speak English. ;)

--
My blog