RIAA Says It Doesn't Have Enough Evidence

Posted by ryuzaki0 on Saturday September 9, 2006 @11:31PM from the need-to-work-on-that-evidence-stuff dept.

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In Elektra v. Wilke, the Chicago RIAA case in which defendant Paul Wilke has moved for summary judgment, the RIAA has responded to the summary judgment motion by filing a motion for 'expedited discovery', alleging that it needs expedited pretrial discovery because it does not have sufficient evidence to withstand Mr. Wilke's motion. The RIAA's lawyer said: 'Plaintiffs cannot at this time, without an opportunity for full discovery present by affidavit facts essential to justify their opposition to Defendant's motion.' The motion and supporting affidavit are available online."

3 of 208 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Re:Since submitter is a lawyer ... by gEvil+(beta) · 2006-09-09 23:56 · Score: 0, Redundant

Ahhh, I see SCO has finally found another revenue stream--consulting for the RIAA...

--
This guy's the limit!
Re:Since submitter is a lawyer ... by CrkHead · 2006-09-10 00:15 · Score: 1, Redundant

Does this mean they have the same lawyers as SCO?
Re:with a bit of luck.. by ColdWetDog · 2006-09-10 00:38 · Score: 0, Redundant

Groklaw will cover ths [sic] in due course
Here, I fix it for you....
Groklaw will translate this in due course
Why can't Google or Bablefish come up with a Legalese to English dictionary?

--
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!