Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

German TOR Servers Seized

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the sometimes-being-an-AC-is-abad dept.

mrogers writes "Servers participating in the TOR anonymizing network have been seized by public prosecutors during a child porn crackdown in Germany. TOR provides anonymity for clients and servers by redirecting traffic through a network of volunteer-operated relays; the German prosecutors may have been trying to locate an anonymous server by examining the logs of the captured relays."

9 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. legal basis by IAR80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On what legal basis?

    ---
    http://world4.monstersgame.co.uk/?ac=vid&vid=47010 693

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    1. Re:legal basis by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      let me answer for the police for you.

      this is a very accurate answer....

      NO.

      well maybe, a friend got their PC back after 4 years and the drives were wiped. If the police take it, do not ever expect it back.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:legal basis by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The truth is there is not guarantee to anonymity in the US constitution out side of voting. I doubt that Germany or the rest of EU is any different. What people don't seem to get is that Child pornography isn't a victimless crime and it is a bigger problem that most people want to admit. Child pornography looks like it will be the down fall of the all anonymous Internet access.
      I was going to rant about how TOR and Freenet should do some self policing and frankly I wish that they would. However I can also see how that could remove any type of common carrier status protection they may have.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  2. Why Logs Are Bad by RealBothersome · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just another fine example of why logging your customer activity can be a bad thing.

  3. Is the polica incompetent or harassing? by johanw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As far as I know and read the Tor documentation, Tor doesn't keep logs. So either the police is incompetent, doesn't know it and seizes the servers anyway (not unsurprising), or either they are irritated by an anonymous network they can't control and try to harrass as many people using it as they can, to try to break it down (also wouldn't surprise me). Or both options apply at the same time (most probable option IMO).

  4. Tor logs by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From Tor man page

    Log minSeverity[-maxSeverity] stderr|stdout|syslog
    Send all messages between minSeverity and maxSeverity to the standard output stream, the standard error stream, or to the system log. (The "syslog" value is only supported on Unix.) Recognized severity levels are debug, info, notice, warn, and err. We advise using "notice" in most cases, since anything more verbose may provide sensitive information to an attacker who obtains the logs. If only one severity level is given, all messages of that level or higher will be sent to the listed destination.

    SafeLogging 0|1
    If 1, Tor replaces potentially sensitive strings in the logs (e.g. addresses) with the string [scrubbed]. This way logs can still be useful, but they don't leave behind personally identifying information about what sites a user might have visited. (Default: 1)


    So one would have to deliberately change several defaults to get logs with any data the cops might be interested in. From their point of view, worth a try, but unlikely to be fruitful.
  5. to break the rules by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm not saying that the rules are 'good' rules, but you, exactly like the child pornographers, are using tor to avoid the rules.

    The point here is that certain 'freedoms' have costs and limits. Your demand to avoid the petty rules of your school about IRC is merely a matter of degree away from a child pornographers demand to view kiddie porn unmolested.

    And meanwhile, with the current international paranoia, the powers that be will always be very interested in who doesn't want to be listened to.

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  6. give it up for authoritarianism by moxley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These governments want total control and will do whatever is necessary to get it - including subverting their own laws, false flag attacks, manipulation of the public via mainstream corporate media distortions etc.

    BY the time their goals are achieved the internet will probably be like an interactive version of MSNBC crossed with the home shopping network.

    Anonymity and privacy online will be a thing of the past. All dissenting viewpoints will be monitored; no, wait, ALL viewpoints will be monitored.

    Things like TOR which promote freedom and privacy will not be tolerated by these fasicsts, and they will find a way to subvert or desrtoy them - if the child porn argument doesn't work then they'll use the oldest trick in the book: There are terra-ists out there, they're gonna get us! We must take away your freedom to keep you safe. Give it up for safety, trust us, we know what's best and we have your best interest in mind.

  7. Not for the unwashed masses, anyway. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Remember Bronfman's declaration about anonymity?
    "Anonymity, on the other hand, means being able to get away with stealing, or hacking, or disseminating illegal material on the Internet - and presuming the right that nobody should know who you are. There is no such right. This is nothing more than the digital equivalent of putting on a ski mask when you rob a bank."
    Edgar Bronfman, Jr., CEO Seagram
    Only the rich and powerful can enjoy true anonymity.

    The rest of the unwashed masses are to be tagged and followed "for their own good" (according to the police).

    If you listened to the police, they would jail everyone for their own good.