Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

eDonkey Pays the Recording Industry $30M

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the sound-of-falling-dominos dept.

ColinPL writes, "MetaMachine Inc., the firm behind online file-sharing software eDonkey, has agreed to pay $30 million to avoid potential copyright infringement lawsuits from the recording industry. The company also agreed to take measures to prevent file sharing by people using previously downloaded versions of the eDonkey software. The eDonkey application now displays the message, 'The eDonkey2000 Network is no longer available. Please see eDonkey.com for more details.' After that message is displayed the uninstaller is launched automatically." If you visit edonkey.com, it logs your IP address. How much will the demise of eDonkey matter, given that most who access that P2P network do so using the open-source eMule?

5 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. Morte d' Robertson by Stanistani · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Slowly the vise closes in on all P2P... yet filesharing grows year by year...
    The media congloms win lots of battles while losing the war.

    --
    You can't talk about Wikipedia's flaws on Wikipedia
  2. Re:Good thing by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Good thing they paid up. Uncle RIAA thought it would be a shame if "something should happen to their nice office building".

    For some reason you got modded down, but really, I have to wonder about the legality of this...

    "eDonkey, has agreed to pay $30 million to avoid potential copyright infringement lawsuits from the recording industry". Not damages awarded by a court, not even to settle a pending suit - To avoid a potential lawsuit!

    If that doesn't meet the textbook definition of extortion, I don't know what would.

  3. I have a question.... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Where did eDonkey GET $30M to pay RIAA? Or is this a hyped-up announcement of a "settlement" that is never really collected?

    1. Re:I have a question.... by shark72 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Where did eDonkey GET $30M to pay RIAA? Or is this a hyped-up announcement of a "settlement" that is never really collected?"

      From advertising.

      Many people mistakenly see the big players in the P2P game as "white knights" because they make it so easy to get so much music for free. But, make no mistake: they are not in it because "information wants to be free." They are not in it to "stick it to the man." They do it to make money. They are in the business of helping people pirate music, and business is goooood.

      It's funny that many of us justify our P2P usage by imagining some record executive in a $3,000 suit. The reality is usually different. The only record company owner I've met ran a ten-person label and paid himself $25K a year. Sam and Jed, the folks who brought you eDonkey so countless teens can "stick it to the man," likely made about $25K every week. The executives at Sharman are also multi-millionaires.

      So why are Sam and Jed rich, while my friend the indie record label owner could only afford to pay himself $25K a year? Because my friend paid artists, paid employees, and paid for the production of the music.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  4. Re:Good thing by BGraves · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The vast majority of disputes are solved this way, which is a good thing. It reduces the costs created by taking a case to court, and frees up the courts to deal with other, more important disputes.