Slashdot Mirror


HP Spying More Elaborate Than Reported

theodp writes "The NY Times reports the secret investigation of news leaks at HP was more elaborate than previously reported. In addition to illicitly gathering private phone records almost from the start, detectives reportedly followed and videotaped some directors and journalists, were given photos of reporters to help identify them, and tried to plant surveillance software on a CNET reporter's computer. HP also fessed up to spying on its own spokesman, whose personal phone records were taken."

31 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Who does HP think they are? by mhazen · · Score: 5, Funny

    I certainly didn't vote for them in 2004.

    --
    Rock is dead. Long live scissors and paper!
    1. Re:Who does HP think they are? by mhazen · · Score: 2

      No, I'd have said the same about whoever was in office if the same things happened under a different president.

      Now quit reading from the Fox News scorecard, and start thinking for yourself.

      --
      Rock is dead. Long live scissors and paper!
  2. News Flash... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So did HP take a secret contract from the Bush Administration to become a covert version of the FBI/CIA/NSA without any government oversight? News at 11!

    1. Re:News Flash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      So did HP take a secret contract from the Bush Administration to become a covert version of the FBI/CIA/NSA without any government oversight? News at 11!

      Well, we COULD answer that question, but then we'd have to kill you.

  3. Will anyone care? by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The interesting question is, will anyone care enough about this to stop doing business with HP? Will any major corporate clients reject these practices and refuse to deal with a company that engages in them?

    I'm guessing not.

    There will be a few people punished in a very public fashion, while behind the scenes this sort of behavior becomes commonplace.

    Maybe it's just Monday Morning talking here, but I hope I'm wrong.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Will anyone care? by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, you are correct, I work in a large corp/gov enviroment, the data center has been standardized on HP server products. With all that invested in a product, (not just the product but the support infrastructure), it would take years to change over to new hardware. I dont see that happening, not to mention the fact that HP proliant servers are quality equipment.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    2. Re:Will anyone care? by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I cannot imagine customers will care. And since customers won't care its unlikely investors will care too much. Some investors could be a bit shaken by news and shakeup but I don't see institutional investors (they really drive the market) getting to worked up over this. Longterm its hard to see this having any real effect on the company. Probably the biggest danger would be the SEC finding bigger corporate goverancne issues related to this (not filing 100% accurate documents, etc). I haven't seen anything yet that is too likely to get them in enough trouble with the SEC to cause any real problems, but with the congress getting involved etc there could be some pressure to make an example (don't really see that happening to HP though). The SEC coming down harshly could be enough to get the large investors to pull back a bit. All in all I'd guess your correct. Probably the fallout will mainly be limited to those individuals involved.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    3. Re:Will anyone care? by HatchedEggs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that the reaction to this is in part wrong. Lets note that the it was select individuals who were doing this... and not all of HP. Certainly, in this case the problems came from the top, but in that it has also been handled and said parties are stepping down.

      In something like this, I don't think you should blame the whole company and try to take it out on HP as a whole. The perpetrators in this instance are quite identifiable, and it is they who should be taken to task.

      What should we expect of HP? More oversight in how they handle their internal leak hunts, etc. Also, to do some work cleaning up their image after this and distancing themselves from those involved. Well, and other things. My point is, why would it make sense to try and punish the company as a whole for this?

      And no, I don't work for HP. It just doesn't make sense to me to blame this on the whole company, as there are tons of great people that work there.

      --
      Justin - Don't be afraid of my blog, it won't bite.
    4. Re:Will anyone care? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      With all that invested in a product, (not just the product but the support infrastructure), it would take years to change over to new hardware.

      I am working on this type of migration right now. We are moving all applications to one vendor's hardware platform (and virtualizing it all). Our timeline on this project is 3 years. We could complete the task much more quickly, but we are being hamstrung by customer internal processes.

    5. Re:Will anyone care? by maxd24 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, but these aren't just a few employees, these are board members. They define the direction of the company. In effect, they ARE the company. You're correct that the individuals who work for HP are not to blame, but the corporation as an entity made a decision to conduct business in an illegal fashion. Whatever happens (and I don't expect it to be much) should happen to the corporate entity.

      --
      It happened before. It will happen again. The only questions are when, where, and what are you going to do about it.
    6. Re:Will anyone care? by svunt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      We live in a corporatist society. When a company can lobby governemt, donate to political parties, and so on, it's natural that we should react to their behavior as we would an individual who'd done wrong.


      We don't admonish people's hands when they steal, we do so to the whole person (and we address our comments to the head, or boardroom in this case).


      I agree that the specificly guilty parties should wear this, but corporations cannot have it both ways; either they're an entity, responible for all their actions, or they're a bunch of people in the same building, and they can start asking favours of their congressman individually.

    7. Re:Will anyone care? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sorry, but these aren't just a few employees, these are board members.
      And the guilty members are stepping down and also under investigation by law enforcement officials. What more do you want? Perhaps you'd like to completely ruin HP so that they can lay off more employees? Personally, I'd be satisfied to see the guilty spend some time in prison and pay heavy fines that take a sizeable chunk out of their personal assets. And I doubt any sane company would ever put them in a leadership position again. Although if that were to happen, I'd support boycotting _that_ company.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    8. Re:Will anyone care? by _damnit_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If what you said were true, I'd be inclined to agree. The people involved have NOT been punished. The Chairwoman will keep her position until January at which point she will step down but KEEP HER DIRECTOR SEAT. The CEO Mr. Hurd, a director as well, was an informed and complicit participant in the decision as much as the Chairwoman. HE WILL BECOME CHAIRMAN. Another director resigned in protest of the investigation. His symbolic resignation intended to be an embarassing slight to the board and force them to reconsider their illegal actions was covered up and not reported to the SEC as required by law.

      So, the roundup on punishments:
      Chairwoman moves down one slot, keeps money, perks and most of her power.
      CEO moves up to chairman
      Director (read: good guy) who resigned out of sense of duty: still gone from boardroom
      Number of directors on the board, reduced

      What should happen? I'm not sure as I don't have all the facts and I don't claim to be a lawyer. As a layman, I would expect Chairwoman Dunn to lose her seat on the board and forfeit any unvested compensation. I would hope Mr Hurd would lose his position on the board as well. The board should bring back the resigned member. The fellow who was leaking info should be removed from the board and lose compensation same as Ms Dunn. HP and other companies need strong boards. HP once had a reputation for good governance. Let's hope that returns.

      BTW - I don't work for HP or really care too much about them. No emotions or money invested.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    9. Re:Will anyone care? by theCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not concerned that anyone will or won't buy HP products and services as a result of them hiring spies. I'm REALLY worried that every company listed in the Fortune 500 is going to see this little episode pipe itself to /dev/null and realize that while the minor PR disadvantages of getting caught in domestic spying are certainly real, these in no way outweigh the insanely STUPENDOUS advantages to be had from hiring spys in the first place. After all, these are companies that think nothing of violating securities law, violating environmental regulations, using sweatshop labor, and cheating on their taxes. What does it matter if they toss in domestic spying if that can be shown to boost profits?

      I'll go a step further, and project that investors will eventually EXPECT a company to have a vigorous spy program in place to protect their investment, and will pressure Boards to adopt the practice.

      Yeah, that whole thing sounds nuts, but it follows as a projection from current practices. What the hell kinda world are we living in?

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    10. Re:Will anyone care? by mpoulton · · Score: 2

      "There certainly were more than 2 board members who knew what was going on (if not, there certainly should have been, and the others should be removed for negligence)."

      RTFA! You apparently haven't been paying attention to this story. The board members were the ones being spied on, not the ones doing the spying. They most certainly did NOT know what was going on -- the chairwoman instigated the operation secretly, to determine which board members were leaking to the press.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    11. Re:Will anyone care? by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      doesn't it strike you that the message sent by the courts to tech companies with their Apple decision is "You're on your own when it comes to protecting your trade secrets"?

      Well, yes, that is the message. That's what the law says -- it is the company's job to protect trade secrets. If they want to keep it secret, they get limited legal protection should a leak occur. The courts are not the place to go and complain that it is hard to develop a major new product in secret, and the courts are not in the business of protecting a company's marketing strategy and timeline.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  4. Common by TheAmazingJambi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It occurs to me that this is probably a fairly common practice among companies of a certain size, to get a better handle on the sort of press they're getting. HP's just the one unlucky enough to have gotten caught this time.

  5. How bad does it need to be? by carpeweb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before this "even worse news" about the extent of the spying, HP's board should have forced Dunn to resign immediately from the board. Instead, they allowed her to continue as chairwoman until January and to continue as a director after that. I predict that the board will now force her immediate resignation, but will they also strip her of her directorship? What about severance? They should take it all, retroactively. IANAL, but I'll bet that's legal, somehow.

    1. Re:How bad does it need to be? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I predict that the board will now force her immediate resignation, but will they also strip her of her directorship? What about severance? They should take it all, retroactively.

      That is what they should do, but, in the world of corporate governance, that is not what happens. Remember, after HP fired Carly Fiorina, they gave her a $21 Million severance package (LINK). And, Carly pretty much ran HP in to the ground. While Dunn's actions are arguably worse (both in terms of HP's reputation and legality) than Carly's mis-management, the fact is that Dunn will probably get a nice big check.

      I imagine that even if Dunn ends up in front of a judge and jury because of this, her lawyers will ensure she still gets paid.

  6. When will people admit it's fascism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am from Italy. My parents were young adults during the brief time Mussolini was in power. While many Italians dislike discussing that time period, my parents were always willing to inform people of it, in the hopes that similar situations may be avoided in the future.

    This is the sort of activity that became widespread during that period. Spying was omnipresent, be it on the street, at work, or while at restaurants. Collaboration between the elites of the business world the government allowed for this sort of privacy invasion to take hold, and further promoted it as time went on. Individual freedoms were thrown out "for the sake of the nation".

    The very same appears to be happening in America and other "democratic" countries these days. On one hand, you have the government spying domestically on its own citizens (the whole NSA scandal, for instance). Security cameras are being installed all over the place, from street corners to ATMs. In some countries, the cameras apparently will have loudspeakers to direct the citizenry that are being observed. Now we find that the very same sort of actions are being taken by corporate executives. Soon enough that will translate down to regular workers. In short, it's a case of fascism much like Italy experienced in the mid-20th century.

  7. Irony in the details by carpeweb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, this new story has a hidden gem.

    According to TFA: "People briefed on HP's review of its internal investigation say that it was authorized by Dunn, the chairwoman, and put under the supervision of Kevin Hunsaker, a senior counsel who is the company's director of ethics."

    How could it be otherwise?

  8. Logistical nightmare by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny
    HP also fessed up to spying on its own spokesman, whose personal phone records were taken.
    How exactly did they fess up to that? I can just see the spokesman reading a memo to reporters..

    "...and we at Hewlett Packard also regret using false pretenses to obtain the personal phone reacords of their spokesman, one Mr..... the freaking HELL?!"
  9. Would you work for a company that does this? by chiph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like the subject line says.

    1. Re:Would you work for a company that does this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You probably already do.

    2. Re:Would you work for a company that does this? by Opie812 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cynical, *and* vaguely ominious in a 4 word sentance. Very nice.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
  10. Scandal goes higher than Dunn by motorcrash · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to this newly disclosed recording:

    Simon: Gentlemen, I'd like you to meet your captain, Captain Oveur.
    Clarence Oveur: Gentlemen, welcome aboard.
    Simon: Captain, your navigator, Mr. Unger, and your first officer, Dunn.
    Clarence Oveur: Unger.
    Unger: Oveur.
    Dunn: Oveur.
    Clarence Oveur: Dunn. Gentlemen, let's get to work.
    Simon: Unger, didn't you serve under Oveur in the Air Force?
    Unger: Not directly. Technically, Dunn was under Oveur and I was under Dunn.
    Dunn: Yep.
    Simon: So, Dunn, you were under Oveur and over Unger.
    Unger: Yep.
    Clarence Oveur: That's right. Dunn was over Unger and I was over Dunn.
    Unger: So, you see, both Dunn and I were under Oveur, even though I was under Dunn.
    Clarence Oveur: Dunn was over Unger, and I was over Dunn.
  11. A hidden gem indeed! by iendedi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    According to TFA: "People briefed on HP's review of its internal investigation say that it was authorized by Dunn, the chairwoman, and put under the supervision of Kevin Hunsaker, a senior counsel who is the company's director of ethics."
    Imagine how much worse it would have been to put the program under a senior counsel who was not an expert in ethics!
    --

    It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  12. NY Times Article Link by sweetnjguy29 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/18/technology/18hp. html?ei=5094&en=0af37191eea65e08&hp=&ex=1158638400 &partner=homepage&pagewanted=print

    I'm still new enough here to hate when the /. story says "a NY Times Article" but doesn't reference or link to the article. I wonder if thats supposed to be so that karma whores like me can post a link to the actual story?

    Oh, and enjoy the link to the print version of the article without ads :-) And try http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/18/technology/18hp. html?hp&ex=1158638400&en=0af37191eea65e08&ei=5094& partner=homepage if ya wanna see the scarey pictures of the HP execs.

  13. Re:More News by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe that torture, nay, gruesome inquisition! and Guantanamo is TOO GOOD for these despicable insurgents who tried to make information from HP public. Unless we can control the release of information - by any means possible! - we cannot sustain freedom and democracy! -- What? -- "It's only HP, you stupid bugger!" --- OH. OOOPS. Hey, Dick, don't shoot that reporter in the face! It's only HP! Geeze, clearing brush is so much simpler than this job.

  14. HP's own corporate rules say... by HPness · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/globalcitizenship/csr/sbc brochure.pdf This is a link to the SBC or the standards of business conduct. This was the bible of HP for many many years and it appears that although some question whether these rules are practiced at the lower levels, it appears that they are not at the higher levels either. If this was actions of any HP employee, they would be TERMINATED. This is several magnitudes more extreme of a situation. The idea is not to operate within just the language and the loopholes, but to abide by the intent of the document which is to set the stage for proper conduct with a low threshold in cases where there is any question of being appropriate. This saddens many HP employees who have worked hard to reinforce a positive image of the company which did operate on a much more noble level in the past.

  15. Re:More News by rbunker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nah... her behavior is obnoxious, and probably illegal, but her body count so far is zero. Between Stalin and Hitler you can pretty conservatively come up with 60,000,000 dead. She is a piker compared to them.