Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Spaceballs Animated Series in Production

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the was-this-something-everyone-was-clamoring-for dept.

Keith Russell writes "CNN is reporting that production has started on Spaceballs: The Animated Series, which will start a 13-episode run on G4 next year. Brooks himself will provide the voices of 'two characters', although they don't mention Yogurt or President Skroob by name." From the article: "Like the 1987 movie, which parodied well-known science-fiction movies, 'Spaceballs: The Animated Series' will spoof current blockbusters as well as every genre of entertainment from movies and reality TV to culture and politics. It is set to debut on cable network G4 in fall 2007. Production has already started on an initial batch of 13 episodes."

6 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Development by StumpMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember hearing once that the movie's name was to be Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2. At the time the big movie in theaters was Kevin Costners "Prince of Theives". Brooks dropped the script and wrote "Men in Tights" instead.

  2. Is the sequel dead? by BobSutan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/29/141723 1 I take it this is dead then?

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  3. Re:Poor Mel Brooks The Producers LOST MONEY by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The problem with the producers movie: What works in theatre *DOES NOT* work on film. Repeat it with me, WHAT WORKS IN THEATRE DOES NOT WORK ON FILM!!! The producers movie was a fairly accurate recreation of the producers brodway production. Matthew Broderick's sniveling character just did't work on film.

    You are forgetting that the Broadway Play was simply an accurate recreation of the 1968 ORIGINAL Movie (starring Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder). And, Gene Wilder's sniveling character did work on film.

    For the record, I thought the 2005 version of the movie was pretty good. Mel had to update some of the jokes for 2005, (but he kept the 'blonde bombshell'). Very funny. He also wrote a couple of pretty good new songs.

  4. Merchandising question by cyberfunkr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a little known bit of trivia, but when Mel Brooks went to George Lucas asking permission to make the parody (not required but all the cool guys do it) George said sure, on one condition: You can't make any Spaceballs merchandise. Why? Because as pointed out in the movie, "Merchandising, merchandising, where the real money from the movie is made." George didn't want to lose out on a Star Wars lightsaber sale for a Spaceballs-the lightsaber sale.

    That's why it's so heavily referenced in the movie; Spaceballs-the T-shirt, Spaceballs-the Coloring Book, Spaceballs-the flame thrower, Spaceballs-the towel, Spaceballs-the etc. Because they can't (couldn't) actually make a single item.

    So does that same limitation exist? Could "Spaceballs-the animated series" be considered merchandising? Or did they get a new deal for parodying "Star Wars, the animated series" without limitations?

  5. Re:Finally a sequel... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spaceballs III, the search for Spaceballs II.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  6. Re:Hollywood needs to close for a few years by Myself · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The idiots who patronize Hollywood need to boycott them for a few years, until they come up with some new ideas, and a new profit model.

    Take the amount of money you spent on Hollywood movies during the last year (tickets, DVDs, rentals, merchandise) and divide it by the amount of money you gave to EFF and ACLU in the last year. This is your Hypocrisy Quotient.
    • If it's less than or equal to 1, thank you.
    • If it's between 1 and 3, your heart's in the right place but your wallet is weak.
    • If it's greater than 3, kindly wear a bright "I sponsored the DMCA!" t-shirt when you attend the Defcon Shoot.