Slashdot Mirror
Zero-Day Team Launches with Emergency IE Patch
Holy Mother of Thor writes to mention an eWeek article about a third-party patch for Internet Explorer. A dark horse security group formed after the WMF attacks in late 2005, the ZERT (Zero Day Emergency Response Team) has released a patch to attempt to slow the malware attacks on Windows. From the article: "'It is clear that we are dealing with an underground group of people who are writing exploits for profits. They are waiting for Patch Tuesday to pass, then it becomes Exploit Wednesday. We're seeing these zero-days in the wild, timed precisely to guarantee at least an entire month to spread,' Stewart said in an interview with eWEEK. Stewart, who is volunteering his reverse-engineering skills and time to ZERT in his private capacity, wrote an early version of the VML (Vector Markup Language) patch the group released Sept. 22 and worked closely with others to fine-tune the update to minimize potential glitches."
but it didn't have anything to do with DRM
Summation 2
I've also found a "killer feature" to be AdBlock.
Okay, so it's not really a 'feature' of Firefox per se. But it's one of those things that even relatively ignorant users can grasp and realize the value of, and once you start using, there's really no going back. And it's so easy to install on FF, you can kind of sell it as a package deal.
Set your mom/dad/grandmother/coworker up with Firefox+AdBlock+Filterset.G, and between the tabs and the lack of advertising, you'll probably have gotten a convert for life.
The only problem is that in many cases it's not quite practical to throw away IE completely; there are too many online banks and other systems which count on it's braindead idiosyncrasies.
"Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
Comments: 1) Make all outbound port 80 requests be routed via the transparent proxy; there shouldn't be any settings in each workstation's browser. This forces everything through the proxy, no matter what. Add other ports (i.e. 8080, etc.) as appropriate. 2) If Firefox doesn't work with some sites, then install the IE View and IE Tab extensions. You can change the rendering engine for the page in Firefox. Yes, it does use IE, but, that way, your users can view most sites in Firefox without switching applications (99% of the time, anyway). You will still have to keep IE patched.
I don't reply to Anonymous posts; if you have something to say to me, identify yourself or I won't reply.
There is no superior technology or anything that would help to make Firefox inherently more secure.
Uh, not quite.
MSIE was rewritten in the mid 1990s so that core modules became an integral part of the Windows OS. It is generally recognized that maintaining a wall between OS and app is good engineering, partly because it avoids many difficult security issues. This is especially true when the application is an interface to the outside world that by nature cannot be secured, like a browser. MS in its wisdom determined that the immediate courtroom benefits of knocking that wall down outweighed the security and maintenance concerns. This was a central part of their defense strategy against lawsuits brought by Netscape and others.
So yes, Firefox's implementation of the available technology is inherently more secure. Firefox preserves the wall between itself and the OS, and is not a superhighway into the core of the OS, the way today's MSIE is.