Slashdot Mirror


Content Owners to Charge Royalties for Searching?

dwarfking writes in with a story that follows up on the impact of recent Google events: "Ok, maybe I'm a little dense here, but isn't this plan more of an impact to the content provider than to the search engines. From the article: 'In one example of how ACAP would work, a newspaper publisher could grant search engines permission to index its site, but specify that only select ones display articles for a limited time after paying a royalty.' So, ok, a search engine company decides it doesn't want to pay royalties and therefore doesn't index the provider's site. Now won't the provider actually lose readers since their articles won't be locatable by search anymore?"

2 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. Sad news ... Bin Laden, dead at 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was found dead in his Pakistan home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his jihad, there's no denying his contributions to popular terror. Truly an anti-American icon.

  2. Content owners are the losers in the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    n/t