Slashdot Mirror


Intel Pledges 80 Core Processor in 5 Years

ZonkerWilliam writes "Intel has developed an 80 core processor with claims 'that can perform a trillion floating point operations per second.'" From the article: "CEO Paul Otellini held up a silicon wafer with the prototype chips before several thousand attendees at the Intel Developer Forum here on Tuesday. The chips are capable of exchanging data at a terabyte a second, Otellini said during a keynote speech. The company hopes to have these chips ready for commercial production within a five-year window."

3 of 439 comments (clear)

  1. Just as they,,,, by klingens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    promised us 8-10Ghz Pentium4 CPUs when they started with the P4 "Willamette"? Or how they promised us 5GHz Prescotts?

    I'll rather wait and see what I can actually buy in 5 years. No need to trust a vendor so far in the future what they can do.

  2. Re:Hey now... by myurr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why oh why won't Intel spend their research dollars on something useful, like a bus architecture that can actually keep up with present performance levels?

  3. History repeats itself by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the last 3 years of Intel, all over again. Only now the megahertz race is replaced with the multi-core race.

    Intel will create the "CoreScale" technology and make 4, then 8, then 16 cores and up while their competitors are increasing operations per clock cycle per watt per core. Consumers won't know any better, so they will buy the Intel 64-core processor that runs hotter and slower than the cheaper clone chip that has only 8 cores. Then when Intel starts runs up against a wall and gets their butt-kicked they will revert to the original Core 2 Duo design and start competing again.

    Oh, and I predict that AMD will release a new rating called the "core plus rating" so their CPUs will be an Athlon Core 50+ meaning it has the equivalent of 50 cores. Queue n00bs who realize they have only 8 cores and complain.

    And to think I didn't like history in school. Maybe I just hadn't seen enough of it to understand.