Slashdot Mirror


Valley Firms Push California Oil Tax

isabotage3 writes, "Still smarting from California's recent enactment of emissions caps, the oil industry is confronting another assault in the Golden State — this one bankrolled in part by Silicon Valley tycoons pushing to fund conservation and alternative-energy initiatives with a tax on oil output. Slightly more than half the money raised by the Prop 87 tax would be earmarked to help cut gasoline and diesel use. Another 27 percent would be put toward alternative-energy research at California universities. The remainder would be used to help start-ups, retrain energy workers in new fields, and for administration." Oil companies claim the backers of Prop 87, some of them venture capitalists, would profit from state money flowing into the alternative-energy projects they are funding.

3 of 543 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Taxes on oil companies end up being paid by peo by Quaoar · · Score: 1, Troll
    "Makes it illegal for oil companies to raise gas prices to pass the cost along to consumers."
    So, unless the oil companies plan on breaking the law, there will be no price increase on our end of it.
    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  2. Re:Money flowing by Gospodin · · Score: 0, Troll
    On a sidenote: do conservatives really think the US has a "free market" when all this govt. money is being pumped into damn near every industry?

    As a aside to your sidenote: Not all conservatives are laissez-faire economists.

    That being said, most conservatives that I know would gladly accept less pork in exchange for lower taxes. I don't know any conservatives who are big fans of industrial subsidies. I'm not talking about politicians here, few of whom can be considered conservative.

    --
    ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
  3. Re:No on Prop 87? by evilviper · · Score: 0, Troll
    So it is the oil companies fault that people have built their lives around gasoline and refuse to change?

    What? Who said anything of the sort?

    I said a straight tax on oil won't push people to alternatives, because there really aren't any right now.

    The alternatives I am talking about? Smaller cars and shorter commutes.

    Those aren't alternatives in ANY sense of the word, that is straight conservation.

    That's good, of course, but higher taxes on oil are just as big of a disincentive to the person driving a 40MPG car, as it is for those driving a 2MPG car.

    Soccer moms don't need small trucks.

    Go rant somewhere else...
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant