Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Lasers Blind US Satelites

SniperClops writes, "China has fired high-power lasers at U.S. spy satellites flying over its territory in what experts see as a test of Chinese ability to blind the spacecraft, according to sources." The article mentions the reluctance of the U.S. administration to talk about this "asymmetric" effort by the Chinese military.

11 of 739 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What I really want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Because it's DIFFERENT when we do it! Right?

    Why, yes, it is totally different.

    Here's a simple test. Who is legitimately afraid the US will be launching nukes anytime soon? Outside of some anti-US lefty nutjobs, probably nobody. Now, who have reasonable fears of North Korea and Iran launching nukes? Israel and South Korea come to mind.

    Now that I've totally destroyed you, mods, please mod parent down as idiotic. I love obliterating you moonbats.

  2. Re:Why Iran and Korea can't have nukes by radja · · Score: 0, Troll

    the fact that israel is just around the corner ofcourse helps too. unlike iran, israel has a history of aggression against political opponents, both inside and outside of its disputed borders.

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  3. Re:Seeing Red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Hey dufus; not every country has chosen to dumb down their spelling to match their crappy educational system. "Colour" is the correct spelling of the word everywhere except the states.

  4. Re:What I really want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    very true (not that China might do it) but you always need privacy to plan the next 9/11 attack.

  5. Re:Why Iran and Korea can't have nukes by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 0, Troll

    but this is a dangerous world with people who *literally* want to send us to hell or to see our redeemer

    Yeah, we call it "the Bible belt."

    Remember, these people sincerely beleive that 2/3 of the world's population is going to burn in hell for all eternity.

  6. Re:Why Iran and Korea can't have nukes by operagost · · Score: 1, Troll

    Iraq definitely had WMDs in 1991 and used them on the Kurds. Iraq ignored all attempts at diplomacy. The USA helped kick its ass.

    Iraq may have had WMDs in 2002. Iraq ignored all attempts at diplomacy. The USA helped kick its ass.

    Seems like the only constant is: negotiate with the USA, or they'll kick your ass. And having WMDs, ever, is probably a bad idea.
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  7. Re:Yup, it sure is an attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    It's a fascinating war to watch, especially considering that the US doesn't even realise it's at war and has been for decades.

    Oh, but wise Colin Smith, sitting there in Bumfuck City, Nowhereland knows all, right?

    Please... The Pentagon was probably running simulations of this situation back in the 1950s.

  8. Re:Why Iran and Korea can't have nukes by operagost · · Score: 1, Troll
    Having had the misfortune of growing up in the old Confederacy
    You are definitely the oldest dude on Slashdot. Did you know Jefferson Davis?
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  9. This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    ..I have left Slashdot for Digg. The article content is declining, and the comments are typically sophomoric in content.

    Sorry, to see such a good site die a slow death.

  10. Re:What I really want to know... by lindquist · · Score: 0, Troll

    And you consider the US a stable regime?

  11. Re:What I really want to know... by WhiplashII · · Score: 0, Troll

    Those are all lies and you know it.

    The truth is that there never has been international law. There are just big countries beating up on little countries, and people complaining about that. Any law that an international body passes will not be enforced by anyone that doesn't want to enforce it. Any illegal action that becomes desireable for a nation will be done. We can alter what is desireable or not, but we can't do that as long as everyone is talking about "international law".

    --
    while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;