Slashdot Mirror


Paypal Agrees to Consumer Protections

davidwr writes "Paypal settled a suit with Maryland and 27 states. Among other things, they'll conspicuously advertise a contact phone number and staff it 14 hours a day and be much more forthcoming about when they will debit your bank account. For those of you who think Paypal Sucks, well, starting soon it sucks just a little less."

30 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. finally by petermgreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The US is clamping down on thier branch of paypal, those who provide bank like services should be treated like banks.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    1. Re:finally by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But that's still not the case. If they were "being treated as a bank" the regulators would have said "thou shalt follow Reg E and all of it's consumer protections" instead of reaching an agreement.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:finally by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell no! PayPal has gotten worse and worse since it's been trying to be more like a bank. I'm constantly being annoyed with calls 'Did you make this purchase - it doesn't fit your profile.' and constantly having to dig up information to prove my account is being accessed by myself and not someone else. This is freaking annoying. I move $120,000+/yr through my account and I'm not stupid enough to lose my card or use a weak password. Leave me the hell alone with your stupid consumer protection schemes. I don't want to spend a couple hours a week (sometimes a lot more) jumping through hoops. Now and then I have to spend a couple days filling out faxes and calling PayPal to get things worked out. On top of that things like cash back bonus have gotten worse since PayPal has been moving to being more bank-like. All downhill since eBay bought it.

      If you want a bank then use a bank. Leave PayPal alone for those of us who liked it the way it was.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  2. Suckage by internewt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "For those of you who think Paypal Sucks, well, starting soon it sucks just a little less."

    Do people really think that when a corporation gets ordered by a court to behave in a different way, that the organisation will really change? At best, the screwing over and offensive behaviour will become more subtle, or "accepted" (by their customers) screwings from other finance houses will be done by PP but "enhanced". Shit like them taking x days to transfer money about, for example.

    But they still suck, I am still not prepared to do business with them. If I need to use the 'bay, then I buy from sellers who take direct bank transfers. Friends can PP for me, but I'd rather not encourage the use of PP in anyway.

    --
    Car analogies break down.
    1. Re:Suckage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you trust some unknown person with your banking information, but not a company. Do you realized that everytime you give out that information you are risking being taken for all that you have in the bank. One of the Nigerian scams involves getting you banking information and then poof you account is dry. Getting the money back is next to impossible.

      If you would like you can give me your banking information and for the small fee of $1 I will send you detailed information on why what you are doing is dangerous.

    2. Re:Suckage by internewt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I pay someone on ebay by a bank transfer, they give me their details, not the other way round (so my privacy is actually maintained, of course they get an address to post the goods to). I don't use ebay much, but from my recent use it appears that a reasonable amount of (power?) sellers openly publish their bank details for payers' convienience. To transfer money I need the accounts name, sort code and account number, and with that info I can only put money into the account, not remove any. The ebay seller would get my bank details on their statement probably.

      Do you realized that everytime you give out that information you are risking being taken for all that you have in the bank. One of the Nigerian scams involves getting you banking information and then poof you account is dry

      Of course I'm aware of the 419'ers, but no (British) bank should let funds be removed from an account with just the a/c name, number and sort code, AFAIK! I have heard the senario you have described above before, and always taken it with a pinch of salt, but that doesn't mean I'm blazé with my bank info. Also, that bank info is nothing more than can be shoulder surfed from my card anyway, or from the bottom edge of a cheque - i.e. the info is essentially in the open anyway. If I am a fraud victim and I haven't disclosed anything stupid (like my PIN), then my bank should be receptive to giving me a refund (they should refund fraud victims no matter what, but I digress). If I have allowed a corporate entity to drain my account because I didn't read terms and conditions correctly, then I'm a bit fucked.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    3. Re:Suckage by jfengel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The 419 scam is usually more work for them than that. The scam usually runs like "Hey, I have all this money, and I'll give you some if you front me the money to get it out of the country". All they steal is the money you send, though frequently they get even more when they ask for money for "additional unexpected circumstances". Once they've found somebody sufficiently greedy or gullible, they milk them, not the account.

      Occasionally it's been known to turn to kidnaping and ransom when people visit Nigeria to try to get their money back or even follow an invitation to "help".

      It's also called "Advance Fee Fraud". I still don't know why it's the Nigerians who make it so famous, since the scam has been played for centuries, even without bank transfers. They just seem to have turned it into a national industry.

    4. Re:Suckage by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From TFA:
      "Under terms of the settlement agreement, PayPal said it is not admitting any liability for the allegations in the dispute."

      From the actual court transcript: "Your Honor, my client PayPal is sorry, but not sorry for what the plaintiffs thought we should be sorry for. I mean sorry in a general yet noble way. My client will keep doing what they were doing but with a much more cautious unscrupulousness.

      At the same time, Your Honor, PayPal recognizes that people were genuinely angry and my client is sincere in their wish for the plaintiff to shut the hell up before more people can smell the stink.

      Oops! Gotta run... Would Your Honor please give the plaintiff this bag of cash? Thanks!"

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  3. Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by duguk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope, they'll still suck if they continue to:

    - locking out accounts for 'attempted signing in from another country' - yeah, without even getting a correct password
    - only use a password to secure accounts
    - only provide a national rate number in the UK, although you can get them on 0800 358 7929 for free
    - expect you to send absolutely everything by fax yet they won't talk to you except by email
    - not allow you to speak to anyone in the dispute or resolution centre, leaving you arguing with sales staff who don't have a clue
    - make it impossible to close your account if it is locked, even after providing all the information you can and no money left in there

    I'm disgusting with Paypal and going through the process of deleting my account. It's not easy, but I'll keep trying. Paypal will always suck in the UK it seems... :(

    Dug

    1. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You forgot blaming eBay for problems and vice versa when they are both the same company.

      If there's a payment problem on eBay, eBay will say "No, it's Payal's problem."

      You go and contact Paypal, they say "No, it's eBay's problem."

      See here

    2. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      My favourite - sending you an email, dated "day 1". Saying that for whatever reason, they'll action a direct debit on your account in "5 working days, so please ensure sufficient funds". The very next day, you get a call from your bank manager. "A direct debit from PayPal has been dishonoured and you've been charged a fee". Wow, that 5 working days went fast. And of course PayPal bills you for the dishonour fee. And when you ask why, when you eventually get an answer, "Well, we could bill it at any time. We send that email as a courtesy. We chose to do so before then, as is our right."

      Bleh. Asshats.

    3. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "This is a notice to inform you we will process a direct debit from your account five days from now, so please ensure there are sufficient funds..."

    4. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by shawngarringer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except they still keep the bank account info. I deleted an account from my PayPal account, then for some reason (stupid me) tried to use it on a different account I set up later. So I registered the account and then wham I couldn't use that debt-card because it was tied to the old account.

      I went into the old account and apparently someone had complained that the printer I sold on ebay and advertised as "broken, parts only, as-is" didn't work upon recipt. So they charged me back the $20. So now, 4 years later, I have a PayPal account with a -120 balance, an "open collections" account on my credit history, and will never ever EVER use PayPal again.

      The worst part is, even after I deleted that checking account, they tried to withdraw the 20 dollars for the charge-back from it. They tried four times! I was broke at the time, didn't even have 20 dollars in the account, so I got charged 25 dollar "insufficent funds" from them also. They can rot for all I care I will not pay that. I would have paid the $20 originally because it was my mistake for using eBay... but I will not pay the additonal fees. I filed a complaint against PayPal at my bank, and they told me that "they hear that a lot about them" and that they've blocked PayPal from ever touching my account...

    5. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by asuffield · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm disgusting with Paypal and going through the process of deleting my account. It's not easy, but I'll keep trying. Paypal will always suck in the UK it seems...


      They will continue to suck, but you don't have to let them get away with it over here. Unlike in the US, the UK holds Paypal responsible for nonsense like this. Screw their "customer support" lines, go directly to the Financial Ombudsman - Paypal is permitted 8 weeks from the time you initially state your complaint, and then the Ombudsman can take over. This is a tax-funded service that is free to you as a consumer; Paypal is obliged to cooperate with them as a condition of doing business in the UK at all. Any decision made by the Ombudsman is binding on Paypal in the same manner as a court judgement would be.

      Having taken care of that, feel free to report the whole affair to the Financial Services Authority. Where the Ombudsman takes care of your case, the FSA shakes the company by the neck until they stop creating more cases. This one in particular:

      not allow you to speak to anyone in the dispute or resolution centre, leaving you arguing with sales staff who don't have a clue


      is an offence that already carries a hefty fine if proven. A company regulated by the FSA is not allowed to create barriers like this; they are required to have a clear and efficient complaints procedure and follow it precisely.

      Lastly, the Office of Fair Trading can also weigh in when any company doing business in the UK fails to handle complaints in a reasonable manner or generally tramples on their customers for profit, in the unlikely event that the FSA is not interested.
  4. Personally, I'm underwhelmed by NickFortune · · Score: 5, Funny
    For those of you who think Paypal Sucks, well, starting soon it sucks just a little less.

    In fact it sucks less by precisely the minimum decrement of suckage allowed under law, and only then when compelled by the court. Way to go, paypal.

    This doesn't make them any more honest, it just stops one of their unfair practices. I'm sure they can think of others.

    --
    Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  5. Consumer Suspicions by infestedsenses · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm more interested in when they will be sued for blocking accounts based on "terrorist" last names.

    Human rights, anyone?

  6. PayPal not sucking? by Life700MB · · Score: 5, Funny


    Does it mean that PayPal will stop blocking accounts (and the money in them) for peregrine reasons like, in my case, your name sounding similar to Al Qaeda's terrorists? And I'm not even in the same continent nor religion as them!

    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, php, mysql, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:PayPal not sucking? by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is modded Funny, but he's absolutely serious. Paypal can and will block your account and SEIZE all of the money in it for any reason whatsoever. Not liking your name is a new one for me, but I've seen plenty of hardship on the web. Newzbin.com, a usenet indexing site, regularly lost thousands of dollars at a time to this practice. They would petition and be re-instated, but lose all their money. It was their main payment method, and most of their customers preferred it, so they kept dealing with it... Until it happened like 3 times in 3 months. They finally called it quits and use other payment methods now.

      Paypal DOES suck. And they SHOULD be regulated like a bank. I suspect their business model might have issues if they do, though.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:PayPal not sucking? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm wondering why some bank doesn't step in and offer a viable PayPal competitor? They have the knowledge and the resources to create one, and they have the funds to provide the safety nets and bank-required measures that an only PayPal-type service should be force to have. What barriers are in the way of this?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  7. Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by deviceb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I sold some information (nothing exotic). It was only $125 and i delivered my end. -a clean deal. A few months go by and i log into my account and see -125 So i say, "WTF why do i have a chargeback & why was i not contacted seeing how you have all my personal info" (acurate info)

    They say i did not suppy tracking information when asked. I had 3 days to send this info before my account was jacked by some little twerp. (zabasearch gave me his home address) I did not check this email because it is only used for paypal, & with no business going on.. why check it?

    So not only did i loose the data i sold,.. but i ended up paying somebody to take it for me.
    So if you sell something as a "service" how are you to provide a tracking number? Any graphic or website payment can be charged back
    -another loophole & it seems that paypal does not give a shat about the person who has been using the service from the beginning.

    now i have to deal with the twerp & waste more time.

    /end rant

    --
    Kill your TV
  8. Happy Days! by giafly · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "We hope this agreement with an industry leader will set standard best practices for Internet businesses across the country to follow," said Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott ... PayPal must also establish a conspicuous "Contact Us" link on its Web pages and provide a toll-free customer support number that operates at least 14 hours daily, according to the attorney general's office. - Star-Telegram Austin
    Standard best practices??? 14x7 and a toll-free number that probably only works within the continental USA? Welcome to 1950.
    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  9. SCUMMVM by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2

    well, starting soon it sucks just a little less.

    It'd suck even less if they'd allow donations for SCUMMVM again...

  10. Re:You know how this goes... by fracai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Almost...

    In Soviet Russia, YOU take money from PayPal!

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  11. I hate when websites advertise paypalsucks.com by adzoox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is run and sponsored by the competition. The webmaster tries to deny that saying he's just advertising alternatives, but the alternatives advertised on paypalsucks.com are FAR WORSE and just fronts for laundering and identity theft.

    StormPay
    iKobo
    YowCow

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:I hate when websites advertise paypalsucks.com by AceJohnny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just an innocent bystander here, but do you have proof for your claims? Or at least a little more development?

      --
      Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  12. Re:i've had no trouble with paypal by ShannaraFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Up until 2 weeks ago, I would have said the same thing. I've used Paypal for about 4 years, bought/sold hundreds of items on eBay, paying exclusively through Paypal. I even had the debit card, which I used to take advantage of their cash-back for Visa purchases.

    In July, I sold an item on eBay, got paid for it, life went on. Second week of September, I get an email from Paypal saying that they had reason to believe this item was paid for with fraudulent funds, and asked me to provide tracking info, etc., for the item sold. I did, gave them everything they asked for.

    Two weeks later, I get another email from them, stating:
    "We have conducted a review of a payment that you received. In this case, returning the funds to the sender was determined to be the appropriate action, and we have completed a reversal of the payment. Good selling practices, like trackable shipping, prompt shipment, and communication between buyer and seller help prevent disputes."

    Huh? I provided them with a tracking number, delivery was confirmed, item was shipped the same day payment was received. I contacted the buyer (this person has purchased multiple items from me, I have no reason to not trust them), asked them if they knew anything more than I did. They have not received any refund from Paypal, and in fact didn't even know there was a problem.

    So, who was my money "returned" to? Repeated emails to Paypal have been ignored, so I've closed my account, I'll never use Paypal again.

  13. Re:o (British) bank should let.... by Kijori · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Direct debit - here in Britain - is subject to vigorous protection. It requires you to give permission to your bank, and if you contest any of the charges then your branch is obliged to immediately refund them. To use it to steal money you would have to find someone absolutely acalculic.

  14. Re: What do I expect from PayPal? by whoisearth · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not disagreeing that PayPal is far different from a bank as it doesn't allow Loans, Savings Accounts, etc. The thing is, that it still does provide the basics. It charges interest. It withholds money. It can hold money just like a chequing account. They can also transfer to and from PayPal accounts.

    The problem I'm saying is that it's very much a "wild west" situation with PayPal right now. Although one can risk them not taking advantage of you and your money one can't guarantee that it's not going to happen. Just like banks, Paypal is bound to be operating on a "profit before people" mode of business. Banks, luckily, are monitored by government agencies to make sure everything is on the "up and up". PayPal, however, is not.

  15. Re:o (British) bank should let.... by internewt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, so it follows that the fewer places my bank details are, the less likely a direct debit could be set up to hoover my account. So by not using Paypal, by not even having an account (anymore), I cannot be phished, nor can PP be cracked (tech or social) and my details getting out.

    Though my bank details may be visible to other ebay users I buy from, and by extension their accounts could be hacked and my details obtained by a crook, but this is pretty unlikely. But by the sounds of it the DD scheme is very protected and thats the only real "attack vector" if you have my sort code, name and a/c number.

    But I found a file on my laptop earlier that I used as a notebook whilst I was constructing my rant to put in the box when closing the Paypal account I had (in error...). I feel I need to share this with the world, and you can give Paypal this amount of abuse and they don't do anything! :) This chunk is over 2000 chars, but the 1000 character limit was enforced with javascript IIRC (can I get a shout out to NoScript?).

    1000 characters is not enough. Why place a limit? Can't Paypal take criticism? Or more likely those beloved shareholders are more important than your customers?

    Paypal are greedy cunts, security is BS, you react in knee-jerk ways to sec issues (as long as paypal isn't ripped off, fraud isn't a problem from your point of view. So what if the customer get ripped off, what are they going to do, find another escrow service they can use on ebay?).

    But fat-cat execs can't ever see what is wrong with their greed (and that attitude filters throughout an organisation. Do you have wanker middle-mgmt types that will fuck over the peons for personal gain (like bonuses or cars)?). I bet the person who reads this (first, but I doubt even if this gets escalated no-one will give a shit) is paid an insulting salary and hates their job, or at least the office politics etc..

    At least in the UK you are regulated by the FSA, but elsewhere I understand you can do what you like, because your not a bank and are so able to avoid any regulation.

    PS It's trivial to by pass restrictions on a website, and only a retard would think that a JS limiter would be worth deploying into the production environment. But let me guess, the accountant types make the decisions, not the people who actually understand tech.

    (though if there is half a clue anywhere in your organisation, you'll have post submit checks to force the-limits) (Wow, you do on the 3 tick box rule. I also want to tick:

    No longer need / one time use
    Bank account verification
    PayPal's customer service was unprofessional
    Fees are too high
    Credit card verification
    PayPal's products do not meet my needs)

    I have entered the following into the "other" box, but it's over a number of characters so your shitty web site is choking:

    Spam. I signed up for policy notifs & transaction emails, but I started getting shit about paypal by text, or someother system that is screaming out as a fraud vector, and you added me to a fucking mailing list without my consent.

    And what the fuck? I have said to close this account multiple times, and I am repeatedly asked if I want to do something else. No, fucktards, I don't.

    Yeah, it turned into a foaming rant :)

    --
    Car analogies break down.
  16. I am won of the winners of this lawsuit by RaigetheFury · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like many of you we all had issues with Paypal. My story is a bit different in the fact that I was part of every bit of this lawsuit. When i was in college I sold things through ebay and I made a good bit of money doing it. One time I had a particularly large order ($3500) and like each of my orders I require that the mailto address AND phone number matched the paypal information. I would call the number, speak with that person and then begin the order. I would also get confirmation on shipping, tracking and insurance. So not only did they have to sign for it but I knew when and who! What more could paypal need right? I billed them for $3500 and shortly after recieved it via paypal. As usually I immediately move the money to my bank account. Two days later I get an email from paypal stating that this was a disputed order and that the money would be held until it was resolved. I immediately call my bank and put a block on my account for any agency called Paypal or with Paypal in the name to withdraw any money. I even specified the amount it would try to withdraw I email back paypal every possible bit of information they could need, address, phone number, tracking number, when it was signed for, the number to contact UPS about who signed for it etc. They responded "the credit card was illegally charged. You have 7 days to remit the funds". "So let me get this straight" I responded. Not only did the credit card address match the paypal address, that matched the billing address, that matched the mailto address, but the phone number is registered to the card holder AND the package was sighed for by the card holder? Insert canned reply and "remit payment or else". So I consulted a student legal at NCSU (love those guys), and they explained that since Paypal was not technically a bank I was not "technically liable for their fuckups". So I didn't pay. My account was locked of course and it had .14 cents in it! Paypal continued to email me about owed money until I sent them a formal letter explaining in no uncertain terms that it would be a "cold day in hell before they got a penny from me". The emails stopped. However, I'm a very careful person when it comes to money and my credit history. You guessed it, Paypal tried to put an unpaid debt of $4000 on my credit history. I contested it and included all of my information. It took 3 months but it was removed and paypal was fined (undisclosed amount). Then I saw this class action lawsuit happening. I really wanted to make sure I had covered all my bases legally and so I joined. I was contacted directly by the lawyers involved and I was added to the "long form" group. There were 2, a quick settlement group and a "take your chances at getting any money back" group. I heard we won and recieved a package in the mail that included a legal statement I do not owe them a single penny and a check for $395. Paypal is STILL just as bad. It's NOT a bank, it is not subject to the laws of a bank, they can hold your money for ANY reason they want to and screw you out of it. It took me 3 YEARS to get this settlement. THREE YEARS. And you know what happened to paypal? Record profits... Good job legal system.